reply to post by Soulstone
This is a long thread. Can't remember if I've posted in it previously or not.
I can appreciate the OP's logic and understand why the dramatic thread-title (as explained by the OP)
Can offer no explanation concerning those who were murdered on 9/11 and their claimed lack of appearance in ghostly form.
However, do we know for a certainty that the murdered victims were not witnessed by their friends and family ? I don't think there CAN be any
certaintly about that for many reasons:
* shocked and grief stricken family and friends of the deceased may not have believed they were actually being visited by the ghost of their loved-one
.. they may have attributed the visitation to grief, shock and wishful thinking
* they may not have reported the ghost visitation of their loved-one/s because they may have feared that to do so would 'cheapen' the memory of
their loved-one
* they may have feared others would suspect they were trying to 'cash in', exploit or sensationalise the tragedy
* they may have feared hurting the bereaved who had NOT been visited by their deceased loved-one/s
* their religion, personal beliefs may not allow for ghosts
and so on.
So we don't know for a certainty that the ghosts of 9/11 victims were not seen, have not been seen or even if they're still being seen by people who
simply choose not to publicise the fact.
As to 'ghosts are not real'. They are. I'm as sceptical as anyone else. I've seen three ghosts. Not many, during a long life. But they were
ghosts alright. And the last one was able to be identified, later. He'd been dead approx. six months. His organs were still subject to laboratory
testing according to a family member, because the cause of death was still unknown.
The ghost was fully life-like. Only thing that set him apart from a living human was the fact his legs tapered away to nothing below the knees.
Other than that, you would have thought he was a living human.



God bless her. 
