Originally posted by tide88
reply to post by LSDeviant
It depends where you live. If a family of 4 makes 200000 a year and lives in NYC it is like making 50000/year in other places. And why should I get
punished because I make a substantial amount more then you do. This is america. Land of opportunity. Since when was it the land if you are
successful you have to give your money to the people who are less so. What about the doctors who have spent 8-10 years of school to and have
hundreds of thousands in school loans. Now they are getting punished for making that much. Also take me for example. I am single and have quite a
bit of diposable income, which I spend quite freely. It is people like me who buy the expensive products, vehicles, homes, etc that keep the economy
moving. Now you want to take away half of my money. What do you think is going to happen. I am going to spend less. By me spending less, companies
are going to have to cut back because profits are down. Look I feel for you. But you have to look at the big picture. Taxing the wealthy is not
good for the overall economy. So you will get a tax credit and your taxes will be lower. Tell me what is better for the overall economy. Me
spending 75000 on items such as the above mentioned or you spending an extra 2000-4000 on gas, groceries, and other everday living expenses. Not sure
who you work for or what you do, but there will be many job cuts if he raises taxes on people making just over 200000.
[edit on 29-8-2008 by tide88]
You are right that you spend more but there are less of you(your income bracket spending). If you make more that $250,000 you are in the top 5% of the
population which is .05 X 300,000,000(I realize that not all 300million are working adults but that number is not important its the
percentages)=1.5million people. Lets say just for argument sake that the top 5% spends $250,000 per year on high end items(obviously you are not
spending 250k but the top 2% probably are but we will just take this as ballpark.) So, 1.5 million X 250K = $375,000,000,000 a lot of money.
Now from your example lets say that with the tax cuts the bottom 95% can spend 2000 extra per year. 95% of 300million is 285 million. 285 million X
$2000=570,000,000,000. That is 200 billion dollars more for the economy.
Now keep in mind that this math is not exact but like i said the percentages are whats important. Also keep in mind that I took the high end of the
top 5% and what they spend and the low number of the bottom 95%.
Trickle down economics DOES NOT WORK! It didnt work in the 80s when Regan tried it and it hasnt worked now when Bush tried it. It only makes the
rich, richer and poor, poorer.
Also keep in mind that trickle down also makes the assumption that all these rich people will be responsibilty putting the money back into the
economy. If you invest it doesnt help the bottom 95%, if you save it, it doesnt help the bottom 95% and if you buy a BMW, it doesnt help the bottom
95%. Unless you are buying enormous amounts of products/services that are produced in this country, it doesnt help the bottom 95%. Are you buying 5
times the number of tshirts sold at walmart because you make more money? Are you buying 10 times the number of hamburgers at McDonalds because you
make more?
This type of economics has been shown over and over to NOT be in the best interest of the largest amount of people.