Originally posted by LoneGunMan
reply to post by hikix
I agree. Remember when the Gov. tried to break them up and then suddenly dropped that and ma a bargain? That is hen they made the deal to hand our privacy to the government on a digital platter.![]()
A quick check on the internet will tell you why the order to break Microsoft apart was dropped and it have anything to do with any secret government deals.
The judge in the case, Penfield Jackson, admitted he didn't know anything about technology and was actually caught napping DURING the trial at one point. He also made statements against Microsoft that an appeals court found to be biased, comments not unlike what you see on this thread from other ignorant posters. So yes, his ruling was considered invalid as well it should have been. If you were the one being accused of something wouldn't you want a fair trial?




