Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 to Include 'Porn Mode', page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 10:46 AM by sos37
Originally posted by LoneGunMan
reply to
post by hikix



I agree. Remember when the Gov. tried to break them up and then suddenly dropped that and ma a bargain? That is hen they made the deal to hand our privacy to the government on a digital platter.


A quick check on the internet will tell you why the order to break Microsoft apart was dropped and it have anything to do with any secret government deals.

The judge in the case, Penfield Jackson, admitted he didn't know anything about technology and was actually caught napping DURING the trial at one point. He also made statements against Microsoft that an appeals court found to be biased, comments not unlike what you see on this thread from other ignorant posters. So yes, his ruling was considered invalid as well it should have been. If you were the one being accused of something wouldn't you want a fair trial?


reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 12:09 PM by sn00daard
reply to post by spitefulgod



Yea all the open source OS'es use M$ monolithic structure
Yea all the open source OS'es moved from multi to single user because it was working so well for M$

Untill Windows leaves behind the whole NT structure, they will always be behind any *nix based OS. *nix was built with safety and networking in mind. Windows evolved from a single PC OS to the bloated spaghetticode it is today. Where do you think all the security holes come from? Let me tell you it is not from sound programming.

Your comment about downloading a complete distro and compiling it yourself is just pure and utter BS (ever heard of Gentoo btw?). This is 2008, not 1998 those days are well and gone. Welcome to the future.


[edit on 29-8-2008 by sn00daard]



reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 12:18 PM by Skydancer
reply to post by hikix



Ah at my age I was hoping you where wrong, I'd enjoy a calendar of pool boys.


reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 12:23 PM by sn00daard
reply to post by spitefulgod


What the hell are you on mate?


I will choose the OS and browser that is under the greatest scrutiny by security experts, that being MS products, they aren't allowed to get away with indiscretions of privacy, others are.


Wait, what??
In what world is Windows more secure then ANY other OS? Could you name me some viruses in the wild for Mac or Linux?
Want me to name you some for Windows 1.0 through Vista?

About browsers, you do realise Opera is the single most secure browser out there at the moment, right? No? Here:

Security
More security

Notice how Opera (which had a lot less security issues to begin with) has been 100% patched?

And last point (posted this earlier):
Acid3 results
IE: 18%
Opera: 100%

There.


reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 12:39 PM by sn00daard
reply to post by sos37


Nope. This does:
Microsoft's "battle plan"

Evangelism Is War
Our mission is to establish Microsoft's platforms as the de facto standards throughout the computer industry. Our enemies are the vendors of platforms that compete with ours: Netscape, Sun, IBM, Oracle, Lotus, etc. The field of battle is the software industry. Success is measured in shipping applications. Every line of code that is written to our standards is a small victory; every line of code that is written to any other standard, is a small defeat. Total victory, for DRG, is the universal adoption of our standards by developers, as this is an important step towards total victory for Microsoft itself: "A computer on every desk and in every home, running Microsoft software."

Our weapons are psychological, economic, and political–not military. No one is forced to adopt our standards at the barrel of a gun. We can only convince, not compel. Those who adopt our standards do so as a rational decision to serve their own ends, whatever those may be. It is our job to ensure that those choosing an operating system are presented with an overwhelming abundance of evidence and reasoned argument in favor of our standards–so overwhelming that the choice of our standards seems obvious, or (ideally) that the developer is not even aware that a decision was faced, and a choice made.

We do this by understanding the barriers that might otherwise prevent the developer from adopting our standards, and removing them; by understanding the inducements that might facilitate the developer's adoption of our standards, and providing them; by understanding the arguments of our competition, and countering them.

Our Mission

The Charter of Microsoft's Developer Relations Group is clear:

Drive the success of Microsoft's platforms by creating a critical mass of third-party software applications and business solutions.

This mission statement contains both the goal which we are striving to achieve (the success of Microsoft's platforms) as well as the means by which we are to achieve it (by creating a critical mass of third-party software applications and business solutions). Let us examine it carefully.


Bill is such a sweethearth isn't he?

EDIT: Almost missed the best part!!

We're here to help MICROSOFT®!
MICROSOFT pays our wages
MICROSOFT provides our stock options
MICROSOFT pays our expenses
We're here to help MICROSOFT
By helping those developers ...
...That can best help MICROSOFT ...
...Achieve MICROSOFT's objectives
Did anyone miss the point, here?


[edit on 29-8-2008 by sn00daard]


reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 12:53 PM by Komodo
reply to post by hikix



totally agree! i've hardly ever used IE, and still don't.



reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 01:24 PM by sn00daard
reply to post by Misfit



I never said anything "ruled", I just pointed out some obvious flaws in previous posts.
If using facts to dispute an argument is acting like a 12 year old, I wish more members on here would act like a 12 year old ^^


reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 01:27 PM by Misfit
reply to post by sn00daard



I didn't point you, nor anyone else. Four pages of "which is better" and "what's wrong with the other", is all I was pointing out. As if arguing about it is going to change either sides minds.


reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 01:41 PM by sn00daard
reply to post by Misfit


Well, I used to use windows untill I learned of the other options.

"If you never change your mind, why have one?” Edward de Bono
"A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." Winston Churchill
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 6 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 17 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 16 hours ago, 69 replies
Official Maine Caucus Results Thread!!
  2012 US Elections, Posted 6 hours ago, 59 replies