Originally posted by Shamanator
I'm quite sure whoever was in charge of those systems has already been reprimanded over this however that is irrelevant and doesn't mean anything in relation to Gary's punishment.
Oh I see. So just 'who' is it? You are suggesting that one person is in change or America's Computer Security? Talk about ignorance. It is absolutely relevant by virtue of the fact that they left a wide open door, more like a gaping wall sized hole in our security. Literally thousands of people could be responsible for this. Apparently this fact evaded you.
Are you really naive enough to think people didn't get fired over this in fact that's the human cost of what Gary has done chances are he cost a few people their jobs possibly not even the right people.
There's no proof that anyone got fired over this. Asking for proof is not being naive.
Gary purposely targeted those machines he knew what he was doing and is guilty end of story.
Again, you are incorrect. He was targeting information, not machines. At least get your facts straight here. The damage was done trying to find who broke in.
This argument is tiresome pointing such flaws in your argument. It barely deserves rebuttal.


That really pissed of the prosecutor, hence the "he'll burn in hell" quote. 

