It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Questions about 911, its just not adding up right

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 18 2004 @ 02:46 AM
link   
Ever since 911 and I've gotten over the shock little things have been nagging me, like why there were no military planes called in earlier, they were called in when Payne Stewarts plane malfunctioned in Oct of 99 to fly along and see what was wrong, to take action if they needed to but on the morning of 911 where were those jets? Why did the WTC come down like it did, you've seen the video, the only buildings I've ever seen come down like that were setting on tons of dynamite, none of it makes sense. I went searching for a timeline and found this website with tons of info.
911timeline.net...
Do you too have questions and whats are they?




posted on Mar, 18 2004 @ 02:55 AM
link   
I have many questions.

Why didn't US officals respond to warnings given to us by multiple countries?

Why was there no escort for these hijacked planes? Isn't that protocol?

How did these buildings come down so quickly and easily? Were they prepped to come down?

How were the identities of the hijackers discovered so quickly after the attacks?

Why was there hardly any plane wreckage at the site of the Pentagon attack?

Why did Bush behave so strangly after learning of the attacks?

And the biggest question of all. Why has the current administration been stone walling efforts to investigate 9/11?

The typical answers would be, "We're doing everything we can..."



posted on Mar, 18 2004 @ 03:12 AM
link   
There is also a problem with the passenger list, the number of names listed are not the same number as there are supposed to be lost on each plane. This is really weird, like one plane there are supposed to be 92 passengers on board but only 86 name listed. This is supposed to include everyone, passengers and crew, and even if they are not printing the names of the hi-jackers it is still incorrect. Also it is supposedly rare if not impossible to use a cell phone if your over 10,000 feet in altitude and there were an astounding 13 calls made apparently to family members, from the 4 hi-jacked planes.

[Edited on 18-3-2004 by goose]



posted on Mar, 18 2004 @ 03:23 AM
link   
Also something else that does not add up and mind you I'm not complaining but the terrorists carried out their biggest hit yet anywheres seemingly with ease and since then no real attempts in the US to amount to anything.



posted on Mar, 18 2004 @ 06:20 AM
link   
Here is my question, why are you creating yet another 911 conspiracy topic? In case you did not bother to check this topic covered just about every way you can.

About the only question that has not been asked about it is "where were the aliens while all of this was going on?"



posted on Mar, 18 2004 @ 06:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by COOL HAND
Here is my question, why are you creating yet another 911 conspiracy topic? In case you did not bother to check this topic covered just about every way you can.

About the only question that has not been asked about it is "where were the aliens while all of this was going on?"


Here is my question, why are you being such an ass? This is discussion forum, so if the guy wants to create a topic then whats the problem? I mean jeez.



posted on Mar, 18 2004 @ 06:30 AM
link   
Here is my question, why are you being such an ass? This is discussion forum, so if the guy wants to create a topic then whats the problem? I mean jeez.

Fine, then he should join one of the numerous ones that are already running. It was not my intention to offend, just to point out this topic has been discussed every day since 9/11.



posted on Mar, 18 2004 @ 04:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by COOL HAND
Here is my question, why are you being such an ass? This is discussion forum, so if the guy wants to create a topic then whats the problem? I mean jeez.


Fine, then he should join one of the numerous ones that are already running. It was not my intention to offend, just to point out this topic has been discussed every day since 9/11.

Because there is still new info coming out more and more and because more people are becoming open to the possibility that there is something amiss in the governments statements about it and the fact that Bush is refusing to tesify which makes me wonder why, also this website I have listed has compiled all the data on it, with the governments explanation of what happened and then a clear and precise answer as to why the governments explanation does not hold up. Its a very good website amd I thought someone who is still interested in it might want to peruse the website.



posted on Mar, 18 2004 @ 06:37 PM
link   
If you look at the hole in the pentagon after the "plane" hit, you can see that the hole is was too contained to be hit by an airplane. Also, the day before september 11, gravel was spread out on the walkway to the pentagon.



posted on Mar, 18 2004 @ 06:38 PM
link   
controled demo theory is #. there were no seconday explosions



posted on Mar, 18 2004 @ 06:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by KrazyIvan
controled demo theory is #. there were no seconday explosions


What happened then?



posted on Mar, 18 2004 @ 06:42 PM
link   
the flames weakined the steel supports cause jet fule burns really hot. it was only a matter of time before sir issac newton (gravity for all you stoners) took its tool on the buildings



posted on Mar, 18 2004 @ 09:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by KrazyIvan
the flames weakined the steel supports cause jet fule burns really hot. it was only a matter of time before sir issac newton (gravity for all you stoners) took its tool on the buildings


I watched the special on the discovery channel about it which gave this same explanation also, but in reading the reports from the firemen who made it inside and reported on what the inside was like there were very few fires inside the building except on the impact floors, don't you think there would have been a collapse of several corners of the buildings in a slower meltdown instead of what looked like a total demolition job and btw seismic activity was detected a few seconds before each building came down but the impact of the buildings hitting the ground barely registered so if the buildings barely registered what was that seismic activity seconds before each building came down.



posted on Mar, 18 2004 @ 10:28 PM
link   
I watched the special on the discovery channel about it which gave this same explanation also, but in reading the reports from the firemen who made it inside and reported on what the inside was like there were very few fires inside the building except on the impact floors, don't you think there would have been a collapse of several corners of the buildings in a slower meltdown instead of what looked like a total demolition job and btw seismic activity was detected a few seconds before each building came down but the impact of the buildings hitting the ground barely registered so if the buildings barely registered what was that seismic activity seconds before each building came down.

The sesmic activity that you mention was the sound of the floors collapsing in on themselves. The outer walls were the last part to collapse.



posted on Mar, 18 2004 @ 10:35 PM
link   
i have a question. how the hell did they know that my friend was video taping the attack in NYC? he said that he was taking the video in his dorm and a few days later, some federal agents knocked on his door and confiscated his camera! WTF IS UP WITH THAT?!?!?!?!?!



posted on Mar, 19 2004 @ 01:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by COOL HAND
I watched the special on the discovery channel about it which gave this same explanation also, but in reading the reports from the firemen who made it inside and reported on what the inside was like there were very few fires inside the building except on the impact floors, don't you think there would have been a collapse of several corners of the buildings in a slower meltdown instead of what looked like a total demolition job and btw seismic activity was detected a few seconds before each building came down but the impact of the buildings hitting the ground barely registered so if the buildings barely registered what was that seismic activity seconds before each building came down.


The sesmic activity that you mention was the sound of the floors collapsing in on themselves. The outer walls were the last part to collapse.

I thought of that also but if the entire building crashing to the ground, all the floors and walls, did not register how would the floors crashing in on one another register? In my mind what would have made sense was the top floors that were hit crashing into the floors immediately below them throwing the upper ones off balance and crashing to the ground and then slowly a bit at a time what remained crashing in on one another, not both of the entire buildings coming down like they were sitting on tons of dynamite.



posted on Mar, 19 2004 @ 01:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by KrazyIvan
controled demo theory is #. there were no seconday explosions


so... then... how did WTC 7 collapse by itself, if it wasn't a controlled demolition? did some invisible plane hit that too? or maybe it was a runaway turbine from impacting WTC 1 or 2...

yeah... how 'bout that WTC 7 building which had little to do with the impact from the two planes? and no, it didn't collapse as a result of the debris rushing from the falling twin towers as the video depicting WTC does not demonstrate such a theory.



posted on Mar, 19 2004 @ 03:39 AM
link   
I've heard that there were explosives planted in the basement of wtc 7 to make it look like an accident while the towers underwent the chaos and nobody would notice it...or under the cover of the thick dust?



posted on Mar, 19 2004 @ 04:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by Jeffrey
I've heard that there were explosives planted in the basement of wtc 7 to make it look like an accident while the towers underwent the chaos and nobody would notice it...or under the cover of the thick dust?


I know they brought some of the building down due to instability, are you saying that one of the other surround buildings came down on its own also like the other two? I remember watching one of them come down later in the day but I thought they intentionally brought it down.



posted on Mar, 19 2004 @ 11:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by goose
Ever since 911 and I've gotten over the shock little things have been nagging me...


Let me help you with the math on why it's not "adding up" in your mind.

8 years of Clinton neglecting foreign policy, failing to catch Osama bin Laden, and hand cuffing the CIA with the Torecelli B.S. equals an attack no one saw coming.

Except for John O'Neal, of course. But the liberals in the New York FBI office weren't hearing him.

Too bad.

Ironic as it is, Mr. O'Neal died in the September 11th attacks.




top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join