Originally posted by emergencyresponseteam
1) Chechnya/Kosovo happened.
Yes they did. So what do they have to do with this according to you? Kosovo was given independence by U.S. and NATO - so why can't S Ossetia and
Abkhazia be given independence?
Originally posted by emergencyresponseteam
2) Russians gave passports to Abkhazes and Ossetians.
As well as to some Ukrainian, Belarus, Georgians, Latvians, and Lithuanians in the 90's. So what? It is not illegal to have dual citizenship - this
practice is common in many ethnically - redistributed areas around the globe.
Originally posted by emergencyresponseteam
3) Russia moved a large army to the Russo-Georgian border.
Define "large" and define "move".
The 58th army was always stationed in the North Caucasus military district. And Russia's move was reactionary to Georgia's and U.S.' actions - the
two were holding large military exercises while Saakashvili continued to preach hatered of Russia.
Originally posted by emergencyresponseteam
4) Ossetian separatists attack Georgian peacekeepers/police.
Osssetians attacking Georgian police and Georgian police attacking Ossetians - this has occured for the past 15 years. Each uses some excuse or other
to sneak small attacks against each other. It is not clear who provoked who, or who crossed whose border in that first week of August.
Originally posted by emergencyresponseteam
5) Georgia responds.
Georgia was ready for the invasion of S Ossetia for over a year and has been preparing for it. And if it was a "response" - it was a rather
disproportionate one - and it wasn't aimed at Ossetian armed rebels but at civilians.
Originally posted by emergencyresponseteam
5) Russia decides to not try to broker a ceasefire with their already existing diplomats and peacekeepers that Georgia has already agreed to have in
Georgia, but rather....
Georgia violated a declared ceasefire several times, including on August 7th. After that Russia refused to accept any more Georgian false
ceasefires.
As for the peacekeepers you mention - On August 7th Georgia opened direct fire on Russian peacekeepers, before Russia even intervened.
So explain why Russia should trust Georgia after this?
Originally posted by emergencyresponseteam
6) Russia invades Georgia.
If Russia "invaded" Georgia Tbilisi would be swarming with Russian tanks, and Saakashvili would be deported if not arrested.
Russia went in to restore the ceasefire by kicking Georgian forces far away from the conflict zone. That might be viewed as aggressive - but it is no
invasion.
If you want to see what an actual invasion looks like refer to the U.S. invasion of Iraq.
Originally posted by emergencyresponseteam
7) Russia refuses to pull out of Georgia after they agree to.
Russia has already left Gori and Senaki. And the ceasefire agreement spells certain conditions - including that Russia has the right to maintain a
sizeable buffer zone around S Ossetia. Nor does the agreement state the deadline for Russian complete withdrawal. Russia did not violate the
agreement.
Originally posted by emergencyresponseteam
8) Russia declares parts of another sovereign nation independent.
Pot meet kettle. Didn't U.S. declare a part of another sovereign nation inpendent this year (hint - refer to 1) above).
And Russia didn't "declare" them to be independent, it recognized their independence. A referendum held in the breakaway republics lead the
republics to declare themselves to be independent.
Originally posted by emergencyresponseteam
9) Russia threatens war with any Georgian ally.
False. Where did you dig this out? Georgia has many allies, and as long as they don't stick their nose where they don't belong everything will be
nice and peachy.
Russia stated that it doesn't rule out war in the case that any Georgian allies take direct part in trying to invade the now sovereign states of S
Ossetia or Abkhazia.
Originally posted by emergencyresponseteam
You see who is banging the drums of war here?
You can hear drums? All I hear is the roar and chanting coming from the U.S. military industrial complex and its "projects" in Afghanistan and
Iraq, and the creation of a NATO buffer zone around Russia. That roar might be deafening out everything else.
Originally posted by emergencyresponseteam
All people who "understand Russia" should understand that Russia helped to kick out 230 000 - 250 000 Georgians out of Abkhazia back in early
nineties and killed tens of thousands of them:
Russia did not take part in that conflict - and it played both sides off, much like all geopolitical giants do. I don't think anyone is defending
what Abkhaz did at that time, and Georgia also committed its share of attrocities.
Great source there.
Originally posted by emergencyresponseteam
That is why Georgians are a little bit reluctant to give Abkhazia away.
Yet Georgia started a war knowing that should they lose - they will lose the breakaway regions forever. It is one thing to refuse to grant
independence to the separatists, and Russia had no problem with this. It is another thing to launched a blitzkrieg attack against civilians, which is
what Georgia had done.
Saakashvili was ready to give-up the republics and go out with a bang, because he is more concerned with being granted entry into NATO rather than
territorial integrity of his own country. His action was reckless - and it is he who is to blame for S Ossetia and Abkhazia becoming independent.
Again if you want to draw parallels - look at what U.S. did in Kosovo. That conflict is eerily similar to that in Georgia. Russia is doing now, what
U.S. did in that conflict. So who is U.S. to tell Russia what do this time around?