Discovery channel crew, film a bizzare ufo "yesterday 26/08/08"., page 8

privacy

Pages: << 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 13 times

reply posted on 5-9-2008 @ 03:26 PM by ArMaP

Originally posted by tarifa37(c) Why has this poor footage of balloons taken on a sony handycam been copyrighted? Am I the only person who thinks that is strange?

There is no need of "copyrighting" things that are his work, as far as I know (based on Portuguese law), the moment anyone creates something it becomes his property and he has the copyright. He may release it from copyright, but all creations are "born" copyrighted.

Also, it's the easiest way of controlling this type of thing, wave a copyright notice and everyone will do what you want.

(d) where is the pro footage that could clear this up with factual evidence.

Where the copyright owners want it to be.

reply posted on 5-9-2008 @ 04:03 PM by TeslaandLyne

What ever happened to that thing.
Ever come down.

It looks like a smoking triangle with popping electrostatic balls
of light.

Anti gravity is such a secret mainly because what gravity is is a
national security secret.

Curved space... scalar wave.... not a secret.. its not anything.

reply posted on 6-9-2008 @ 02:19 AM by tarifa37

Originally posted by ArMaP

Originally posted by tarifa37(c) Why has this poor footage of balloons taken on a sony handycam been copyrighted? Am I the only person who thinks that is strange?
There is no need of "copyrighting" things that are his work, as far as I know (based on Portuguese law), the moment anyone creates something it becomes his property and he has the copyright. He may release it from copyright, but all creations are "born" copyrighted.

Also, it's the easiest way of controlling this type of thing, wave a copyright notice and everyone will do what you want.

(d) where is the pro footage that could clear this up with factual evidence.
Where the copyright owners want it to be.

Thanks very interesting,I did not know that(about copyright law),

reply posted on 6-9-2008 @ 02:41 AM by Tiloke

Originally posted by tarifa37

I feel sorry that you like many others will just dismiss this and my sighting as balloons.They aren't balloons this is real, and probally the best footage of a real ufo ever.I can only guess that they are some sort of drone that they disguise as balloons so they can fly in our air space without people twigging what they really are.

I feel sorry that you like many others will just accept a bunch of balloons as proof undeniable of UFO's. This isn't real, they are balloons. It's probably the worst footage of an "actual" ufo ever.

"I can only guess that they are some sort of drone that they disguise as balloons so they can fly in our airspace".......Are you serious?!?!?!?!? Using that logic, every cloud, airplane, the sun and moon, kite, meteor and hot air balloon is really a UFO drone in disguise.

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, not a pizza disguised as a cigar. But I guess for you, if it quacks like a duck, looks like a duck and swims like a duck, its really a mutant cybernetic giraffe in disguise.

reply posted on 6-9-2008 @ 07:08 AM by tarifa37

Originally posted by Tiloke

Originally posted by tarifa37

I feel sorry that you like many others will just accept a bunch of balloons as proof undeniable of UFO's. This isn't real, they are balloons. It's probably the worst footage of an "actual" ufo ever.

"I can only guess that they are some sort of drone that they disguise as balloons so they can fly in our airspace".......Are you serious?!?!?!?!? Using that logic, every cloud, airplane, the sun and moon, kite, meteor and hot air balloon is really a UFO drone in disguise.

I am very serious about my own sighting www.liveleak.com... That may well be some sort of drone,of what origin I have no idea. But the" discovery channel ufo " I am now almost 100% sure(as I said in a previous post,that you obviously did not read before you started going on about ducks and pizzas comming from mars or something, lol) that one is a balloon. Thanks for your post anyway. Cheers, tarifa37.

reply posted on 6-9-2008 @ 07:27 AM by tarifa37

Here is Arturo Robles Gil giving his side of the story on video and what he thinks the object is www.youtube.com... .

Thankyou Arturo for your apology ,it was a good vid and shows how easy it is to be tricked by this sort of sighting. I would also like to apologize if I made things worse,if it had not been for my own sighting www.liveleak.com... then I would have thought they were balloons from the start,please don't give up your research and good luck.I would still love to see the pro footage,I guess we never will. Case closed ?

reply posted on 14-9-2008 @ 08:24 AM by Anonymous ATS

So could someone please explain why the professional camera operator from the Discovery Channel kept filming these "balloons"? Wouldn't he have seen what they were and not wasted any more of his time filming them? He watches them for quite a while.

reply posted on 16-9-2008 @ 04:03 PM by tarifa37

Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
So could someone please explain why the professional camera operator from the Discovery Channel kept filming these "balloons"? Wouldn't he have seen what they were and not wasted any more of his time filming them? He watches them for quite a while.

You are not the only one who thinks there is something fishey going on,its all very strange.I would still love to see the pro footage,and as others have said Mr Gils body language looks very uneasy when he tells us that he now thinks they are just balloons.It maybe because he is embarrassed that he fell for the discovery teams prank,or its because he has been told to say it was balloons, Nuff said

reply posted on 24-9-2008 @ 09:47 AM by tarifa37

A stabilized video of this strange object(balloon or whatever it is) has been made by ReinOwader .www.youtube.com...
I don't know if it makes look more like a balloon or more like something else. Sure does look strange and moves very weirdly.

reply posted on 27-9-2008 @ 11:43 AM by Anonymous ATS

reply to post by tarifa37

Arturo Robles Gil has left this comment on his video www.youtube.com... where he admits that he thinks it is a balloon......

2012451026 (12 hours ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Reply
The personnel who came to my house in representation from Discovery Channel recorded the object with a professional Panasonic camera even using an external monitor where I could state they were making the recording. They must display their recording which must have much more definition.

He had previously said that the pro footage was not as good as his own footage. So we now know that there is pro footage of this object and that it should be alot better. Of course it may just prove that it was a balloon.Or maybe not.

reply posted on 28-9-2008 @ 03:40 AM by tarifa37

Racounteur: Arturo Robles Gil. Has posted this comment on his "WHAT HAPPENED WITH DISCOVERY CHANNEL UFO? CAPTURE."
www.youtube.com...

"The personnel who came to my house in representation from Discovery Channel recorded the object with a professional Panasonic camera even using an external monitor where I could state they were making the recording. They must display their recording which must have much more definition".

He had previosly said in an email to "free_spirit"
"I must say that
the american tv crew did'nt got a clear shot of the object and they could not make
any conclusion about it but I informed them later that it was not a UFO but a buch
of balloons so that was the end of the incident. "

reply posted on 29-9-2008 @ 02:12 AM by The dragon is taking over

EDIT___ Wrong video comment.... sorry!

[edit on 29-9-2008 by The dragon is taking over]

reply posted on 29-9-2008 @ 02:43 AM by The dragon is taking over

Originally posted by tarifa37
A stabilized video of this strange object(balloon or whatever it is) has been made by ReinOwader .www.youtube.com...
I don't know if it makes look more like a balloon or more like something else. Sure does look strange and moves very weirdly.

It looks like an animal to me, though I must it's really amazing!

Is it just me or does it look like 2 sky divers one in a red suit another in a yellow at one point, then almost like a dragon or hydra is what it reminds me of.
Here's a video of reference of flying balloons.

Black balloons

Bear with me as it is toward the end, and the best I could find at 1 AM.

Plus those would have to be huge @$$ balloons!!!

reply posted on 29-9-2008 @ 12:14 PM by tarifa37

reply to post by The dragon is taking over

Thanks for that post and it does help show how balloons act once in the air against each other and as a group. I saw that they were spinning in a group and jostling for position not unlike the discovery footage, but not quite the same probally due to the different shapes of objects(balloons?) in that video.

reply posted on 29-9-2008 @ 01:10 PM by TeslaandLyne

Other than stray lightning balls of static electricity... like what is all
that static doing up in the air.. the Tesla 'bulbs' ( beam anodes to intake
electric momentum for movement ) look completely disorganized
and out of sync... its just too many rookie pilots.

reply posted on 29-9-2008 @ 01:24 PM by TeslaandLyne

Originally posted by tarifa37
Racounteur: Arturo Robles Gil. Has posted this comment on his "WHAT HAPPENED WITH DISCOVERY CHANNEL UFO? CAPTURE."
www.youtube.com...

"The personnel who came to my house in representation from Discovery Channel recorded the object with a professional Panasonic camera even using an external monitor where I could state they were making the recording. They must display their recording which must have much more definition".

He had previosly said in an email to "free_spirit"
"I must say that
the american tv crew did'nt got a clear shot of the object and they could not make
any conclusion about it but I informed them later that it was not a UFO but a buch
of balloons so that was the end of the incident. "

They didn't know enough to stop my post:

teslaandlyne (5 seconds ago)
Under pressure to hide the Tesla flying machine behind balloons again. Hey bud. Take a hike, balloons are used for the cover of Tesla inventions.

He's no aceBrianfox.

reply posted on 29-9-2008 @ 01:43 PM by tarifa37

Er thanks ,I think

reply posted on 11-10-2008 @ 05:50 AM by tarifa37

Arturo Robbles Gilles has left another comment on "UFO over Mexico City August 26, 2008 "Was a prank"? was iT"
www.youtube.com...

2012451026 (1 week ago) Show Hide 0 Marked as spam Reply | Spam In general terms the professional video cameras handle between 10x and 20x of power zoom lens. perhaps I did not know myself to explain, I said that: IT IS NECESSARY TO SEE IF THIS PROFESSIONAL VIDEO CAMERA HAS THE SUFFICIENT POWER TO CAPTURE DE OBEJECT WITH ENOUGH DETAIL.

reply posted on 14-10-2008 @ 04:06 AM by tarifa37

Here is an update on the discovery footage,Arturo has put this message up with his new video of stills he took of the object"I have capture several photos from the video when I was with the people who came to my house in representation from Discovery Channel.
In spite of all, itself thinking that this object is bonch of globes."

www.youtube.com...

Globes in English means "globes "not balloons as I thought it would.So some confusion there.

Still waiting for the pro footage. Also why would he bother posting a video of stills of an object that he believes are just a "bonch of globes".Unless he does think that there maybe more to them than balloons.

reply posted on 14-10-2008 @ 04:14 AM by tarifa37

reply to post by tarifa37

Further to my update above he has now also left a message on his apology video . www.youtube.com...

2012451026 (5 hours ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Reply
"I had the opportunity to see that these people of Discovery really were recording to the object, in fact showed it to me in an external portable monitor and the video camera had the center of recording in red. IN TRUTH I ALSO WOULD WANT TO SEE HIS RECORDING. Thanks for your commentaries."

Threrfore I think we can say now that he has some doubt that it is was a bunch of balloons,otherwise why would he want to see their recording if he knows for sure that they were balloons,why bother?