|
reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 09:18 PM by silverhawke
|
Just because it slightly resembles what could be piles of rocks doesn't mean that is what it actually is. Sorry dude but this is not evidence of
anything.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 09:28 PM by beforetime
|
Sorry that is what is called a SEX ROCK
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 09:33 PM by SuperSlovak
|
we are trying to have an intellgent discussion here kiddies
go to below top secret.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 10:22 PM by Parabol
|

Originally posted by SuperSlovak
we are trying to have an intellgent discussion here kiddies
go to below top secret.
So are the rest of us...
Originally posted by SuperSlovak
What else other than a intelligent being could have constructed this?
Are you completely unwilling to acknowledge the fact that it could be a natural phenomenon?
Originally posted by SuperSlovak
there is is folks, the evidence, the proof, someone or something was living on mars.
This is a picture, it is not proof and neither is your interpretation.
Originally posted by SuperSlovak
no its not a big rock,
its lots of small rocks stacked on top of eatchother.
You have no evidence to back this up besides your interpretation of the photo. Can you prove that it is not a big rock or volcanically fused rocks?
Originally posted by SuperSlovak
Why do you let your ignorance take control?
Incase you didn't realize we like to deny ignorance here.
It's not a rock it's a ruin. look at the similarities.
Youll just have to accept that sometimes your wrong.
I wouldn't be so quick to throw around the ignorance label when all you've done is post a picture and vehemently insist that your perception is
correct. You have absolutely no proof. You have rudely called others wrong for using the same power of interpretation you do, as well as providing
no evidence to back up your claim.
I also suggest you look at the similarities to rocks formed from volcanic eruptions and wind erosion.
Originally posted by SuperSlovak
The ruin that I posted is not the only strange object on mars...
there are hundreds more,
Do you completely deny that this could be a natural occurrence, like the many varied rocks which are found on this planet?
Do you have any expertise in geology, archeology, astronomy, or any field related to this object and it's surroundings?
Your unwillingness to accept the possibility of other interpretations or information is not contributing to intelligent discussion on this board.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 10:33 PM by monkeybus
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 10:35 PM by Skipper1975
|
reply to post by SuperSlovak
what about underground bases?
planets are not solid
have a nice day
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 10:36 PM by monkeybus
|
/\/\ .\ \ /\ /\ /\
like noguhts and crosses?, hehe just noticed the big xes an os int he sand, im almost certain this is a joke from nasa
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 10:42 PM by Phage
|
Originally posted by monkeybus
for your eyes only,, new nasa photo
Who, me? My eyes?
It's a beautiful shot. I see several object that appear to be rocks (I'm trying to be a good skeptic). These object appear to be similar to objects
found in the OP.
Is there something in particular I should look at? If so, can you direct me to it?
edit: Oh, the um...things that appear to be markings. Well, there is a small possibility they may be tracks left by the alleged rover while examining
certain objects that appear to be rocks.
[edit on 27-8-2008 by Phage]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 10:43 PM by lizzipwn
|
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 10:43 PM by LEAP STICK
|
reply to post by SuperSlovak
I'm afraid there is probably a simple explanation rather than,
I don't know what it is so it must be Alien-Made.
There seems a lot of smaller rocks surrounded by a whole lotta
nuthin. And therefore is more probable it to be a Meteor.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 10:45 PM by monkeybus
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 10:48 PM by monkeybus
|
reply to post by Phage
how does one, drive in circle, drop a milkcarton? lift up off the sand draw a cross, lift up again, and plop down to take a photo?
try it yourself on a wet beach
this is what i see
o ( ; '>
x
[edit on 27-8-2008 by monkeybus]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 10:50 PM by the13thdeceptionist
|
Ok ,something doesn't smell right here,look at my picture, it's the anomaly enlarged.
The pixels around the anomaly are different from the ones to the side of it.
i think its shooped.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 10:50 PM by ProfEmeritus
|
reply to post by monkeybus
It is not a joke. Here is NASA's explanation of the marks you see.
marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov...
Rover tracks from driving by Spirit are visible on Home plate in the center and right of the image. These were made during Spirit's second
exploration on top of the plateau, which began when Spirit climbed onto the southern edge of Home Plate in September, 2007.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 11:03 PM by monkeybus
|
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 11:06 PM by Parabol
|
Here I've taken a few of the black and white Spirit photos, with the anomaly (rock), and merged them together. You can see that the rock is sitting
on a slope. Looking through the Spirit panorama I found there are other singular large rocks sitting on the slopes of the crater rim. I'm not sure
if any in the panorama are the rock in question, but we can see that this is not an anomaly in the sense that there are other large rocks strewn
about. Which I believe is a completely natural phenomenon.
Link to Large version of the above image
EDIT:
Odd how the person who presents this as proof of alien life doesn't, and doesn't seem to be expected to, provide any evidence which would help prove
his point.
If you really want to deny ignorance, you would be doing the research I'm doing in order to prove to yourself that it couldn't be anything else. No
one found truth sticking their head in the sand.
[edit on 27-8-2008 by Parabol]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 11:08 PM by monkeybus
|
reply to post by Parabol
quick look at mine as well, freind, its pretty amazing, compared.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 11:15 PM by Givenmay
|
reply to post by the13thdeceptionist
That is why I mentioned it looked like heat vapors emitting from it on the first page!
I think it looks more interesting in neon!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 11:38 PM by Parabol
|
reply to post by Givenmay
Looks like some igneous rock with the neon outlining the curvature. I don't see many stacked rocks that look like that.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |