Novavax Says Vaccine Protects Against Deadly Bird Flu [Update: and Swine Flu], page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 26-8-2008 @ 02:02 PM by schrodingers dog
reply to post by Wildbob77



I would imagine that the initial customer would be the governments of the countries where this is a major issue. At least I would hope so.



reply posted on 26-8-2008 @ 02:43 PM by schrodingers dog
reply to post by Amaterasu



Ok, I am new to this forum so I am not aware of all the conspiracy theories.
But isn't it a little soon to be jumping to microchipping theories?
Like you said, perhaps a look at their formula or even their delivery system would be wise before we start screaming "bloody murder."
Wouldn't that be a more prudent course? What if it actually saves lives and is nothing more sinister that that?

[edit on 8/26/2008 by schrodingers dog]


reply posted on 26-8-2008 @ 03:09 PM by Amaterasu
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
reply to
post by Amaterasu



Ok, I am new to this forum so I am not aware of all the conspiracy theories.
But isn't it a little soon to be jumping to microchipping theories?
Like you said, perhaps a look at their formula or even their delivery system would be wise before we start screaming "bloody murder."
Wouldn't that be a more prudent course? What if it actually saves lives and is nothing more sinister that that?


Well... A stated goal of the Elite is to microchip everyone, so I figured that if the vaccine is made in China (20 to 1 it is), there is a good likelihood that a chip could be added.

As for saving lives...

Relative to what you said above... 94% success rate of what? Making the body produce antibodies...?

Also, there is no evidence whatsoever that any vaccine actually helped anyone (but plenty that they have killed or damaged some). All vaccines can be shown to have come out while a downward trend of the disease they were for was taking place, and a number saw the disease they were for INcrease after vaccination.

The downward trend of illness in general corresponds to increased cleanliness (not sanitization, mind you) and, especially, better diets. But the pharmaceutical companies try to take credit.

Given that the pharmaceutical companies have an interest in selling vaccines, and given the fact that they kick back to the doctors that prescribe and/or administer their drugs and vaccines (so all MD's have a conflict of interest), it is not surprising that the medical profession and Big Pharma will tell you that vaccines have any function.

Also, given that the Elite have a stated goal to get rid of the "useless eaters," one must be wary of the ingredients...speaking of which...

Common ingredients:

Formaldehyde

Mercury

Antifreeze

Aluminium

2-Phenoxyethanol

Phenol

Methanol

Borax

Glutaraldehyde

MSG

Sulfate and phosphate compounds

Polymyxin B

Polysorbate 20 / 80

Sorbitol

Polyribosylribitol

Beta-Propiolactone

Amphotericin B

Animal organ tissue and blood

Aborted human fetal tissue and human albumin

Large foreign proteins

Latex

Animal Viruses

Human Viruses

Bacteria and the toxins they produce

Mycoplasma

Genetically modified yeast

Foreign DNA

This is not an exhaustive list. It is, however, a list with disturbing toxic and/or allergenic properties.

From: www.vaccination.inoz.com...

So... Based on all this... I am extremely leery of any vaccine that makes any claims.


reply posted on 26-8-2008 @ 03:23 PM by schrodingers dog
reply to post by Amaterasu



I got the 94% from the Reuters article.

The highest dose of the vaccine stimulated the development of a protective level of antibodies in 94 percent of those vaccinated, the company said.

"Two doses of this novel vaccine -- which is designed to prevent bird flu -- gave strong immune responses. The data are encouraging that this new vaccine approach can help prevent pandemic influenza," Dr. Robert Belshe of the Saint Louis University School of Medicine in Missouri, who served on the Data and Safety Monitoring Board for the study, said in a statement.


I am aware that most vaccines are nothing but poison. A lot of my friends in the UK will not vaccinate their children. I don't know what the law is in the US.

I am not really disagreeing with anything you have said. There is good cause for one to be apprehensive and leery.

My only point is that there is A chance that this could save many many lives if it can stem an epidemic, that's all. We question everything as we should, we try to deny ignorance, and sometimes it turns out that something is simply what it seems to be.

If you want me to, since I live near Rockville MD, I'll go take a gander and see if they have any Chinese lab technicians.


reply posted on 26-8-2008 @ 09:31 PM by Amaterasu
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
reply to
post by Amaterasu



I got the 94% from the Reuters article.


I understand that Reuters reported what the manufacturer provided... But the fact is... It produces antibodies in 94%. But antibodies are NOT protection. All it means is 94% show as being exposed. There is no evidence that this translates to IMMUNITY.

Many people who showed positive for the antibodies for a given disease still got the disease they had the antibodies for.

I am aware that most vaccines are nothing but poison. A lot of my friends in the UK will not vaccinate their children. I don't know what the law is in the US.


Actually... ALL vaccines are poison. They all have formaldehyde, and virtually all have mercury - even the ones that say "mercury-free."

I am not really disagreeing with anything you have said. There is good cause for one to be apprehensive and leery.


From my research, there is good cause to absolutely avoid these poisonous injections. I am leery of the studies, absolutely against the vaccines.

My only point is that there is A chance that this could save many many lives if it can stem an epidemic, that's all. We question everything as we should, we try to deny ignorance, and sometimes it turns out that something is simply what it seems to be.


There is no evidence any vaccine has done anything to save a single life, nor stem an epidemic. In fact, there is plenty evidence that vaccines promote diseases that they are being given for. Like I said... Many show an INCREASE in a disease they were given for after extensive vaccination.

If you want me to, since I live near Rockville MD, I'll go take a gander and see if they have any Chinese lab technicians.


I'm not saying that the vaccine was developed in China. I'm saying any mass production is likely to be done in China. And with very lax regulations and oversight of stuff like that coming in... Who knows what they will actually contain.


reply posted on 26-8-2008 @ 09:38 PM by schrodingers dog
reply to post by Amaterasu



So you're saying that no vaccine, in the history of mankind, has ever prevented a death or a disease?
Not even one?
By the way I'm not saying you're not right, it's just hard to believe.


reply posted on 26-8-2008 @ 11:02 PM by Amaterasu
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
reply to
post by Amaterasu



So you're saying that no vaccine, in the history of mankind, has ever prevented a death or a disease?
Not even one?
By the way I'm not saying you're not right, it's just hard to believe.


I'm saying there is no evidence that any vaccine has done anything beneficial ever. Yes.

I'm also saying there is plenty of evidence of harm being done by vaccines.

I am also saying there is plenty of evidence of an increase in the incidence of some diseases immediately after a large vaccination push for the specific disease.

I am saying that the Pharmaceutical companies make money hand over fist from vaccines.

I'm saying that Pharmaceutical companies are making money hand over fist from treating illnesses caused by vaccines (whether the disease the vaccine was supposed to prevent, or chronic illnesses caused by creppola they put into the vaccines).

I'm saying that Pharmaceutical companies pay doctors to prescribe and/or administer their products, including vaccines, and therefore, all MD's have a conflict of interest on the subject of vaccines.

I'm saying all diseases for which there was a vaccine developed were declining as better diets and cleanliness went up in society, and that further movement downward in the trend was claimed by the pharmaceutical companies as being a result of vaccination, when actually, there is no evidence this is so.

I'm saying there is an agenda to eliminate the "useless eaters" on this planet - and what better way than to take them out slowly and leach them for all they're worth in the process.

I'm saying that, knowing the facts, anyone who then chooses to vaccinate is...heh. "Fool" just is WAY too understated a term.

[edit on 8/26/2008 by Amaterasu]


reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 01:30 AM by schrodingers dog
reply to post by Amaterasu



Some of what you say is indeed correct, especially when you refer to the true nature of pharmaceutical companies. I can tell you are passionate about this issue and I can understand where you're coming from.
However in imho, you paint a pretty broad brush by saying that there is no evidence that ANY vaccine in history has ever helped anyone. I did a little superficial research on the subject, and I know you will probably reject most sources as unreliable or self-serving. Still:


The gasping breath and distinctive sounds of whooping cough; the iron lungs and braces designed for children paralyzed by polio; and the devastating birth defects caused by rubella: To most Americans, these infectious scourges simultaneously inspire dread and represent obscure maladies of years past. Yet a little more than a century ago, the U.S. infant mortality rate was a staggering 20 percent, and the childhood mortality rate before age five was another disconcerting 20 percent.1 Not surprisingly, in an epoch before the existence of preventive methods and effective therapies, infectious diseases such as measles, diphtheria, smallpox, and pertussis topped the list of childhood killers. Fortunately, many of these devastating diseases have been contained, especially in industrialized nations, because of the development and widespread distribution of safe, effective, and affordable vaccines.
source




reply posted on 3-9-2008 @ 11:02 PM by schrodingers dog
reply to post by ProTo Fire Fox



Ok now you got me worried about Tamiflu!
My doctor gives my wife and I a box every year to have in the cabinet just in case.
Are you saying we shouldn't use it in case of an outbreak?
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Another Bug, Worse than the Last Bug - Flesh Eater Spreading
  Posted 10 days ago with 20 member flags
Superbugs spied off the Antarctic coast
  Posted 10 days ago with 14 member flags
Deadly new superbug heading for Britain!
  Posted 0 days ago with 8 member flags
NYC Employers Now REQUIRE Yearly H1N1 Shot - Or you\'re FIRED!
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags
Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Found in 37 U.S. States
  Posted 6 days ago with 6 member flags
Bird flu \'censorship\' decision
  Posted 12 days ago with 5 member flags
No way of stopping leak of deadly new flu, says terror chief
  Posted 5 days ago with 5 member flags
Schmallenberg Virus affects European Livestock
  Posted 5 days ago with 5 member flags