It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Darkpr0
If the aircraft was invisible it could not have cast a shadow due to the physics of light.
Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
reply to post by asmeone2
Have you ever noticed sometimes when you hear a plane and you look in the direction of the sound the plane is actually far beyond where it sounds like it is?
That doesnt happen because there is an invisible plane where youre hearing the sound. It just takes longer for the sound of the plane to travel to your ears than the image of the plane to travel to yours eyes because light travels faster than sound.
Also think about the angle of the sun compared to the location of the plane. Have you ever noticed how your shadow can change spots depending on where the sun is? mabye thats similar to what happened with this plane. Is it possible that the shadow was in one spot but the plane was further over? Mabye behind a tree out of your line of sight? Id say yes it is possible.
As for the shape of the shadow. They can either be elongated or really short or round etc based on the location of the sun. It is possible that the shadow was not an accurate representation of the shape of the actual craft.
Originally posted by asmeone2
Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
reply to post by asmeone2
Have you ever noticed sometimes when you hear a plane and you look in the direction of the sound the plane is actually far beyond where it sounds like it is?
That doesnt happen because there is an invisible plane where youre hearing the sound. It just takes longer for the sound of the plane to travel to your ears than the image of the plane to travel to yours eyes because light travels faster than sound.
Also think about the angle of the sun compared to the location of the plane. Have you ever noticed how your shadow can change spots depending on where the sun is? mabye thats similar to what happened with this plane. Is it possible that the shadow was in one spot but the plane was further over? Mabye behind a tree out of your line of sight? Id say yes it is possible.
As for the shape of the shadow. They can either be elongated or really short or round etc based on the location of the sun. It is possible that the shadow was not an accurate representation of the shape of the actual craft.
We are still confused on "invisible" here I see.
In ths context, and most others, it doesn't mean phsycially not there, it simply means not seen.
Originally posted by Darkpr0
If the aircraft was invisible it could not have cast a shadow due to the physics of light.
If you saw a shadow, you could have seen the plane. If you didn't see it, then either the shadow was from something else, or you merely weren't looking in the right direction.
It is possible that if the aircraft existed, the second it flew over you it activated its cloaking mechanism, but why would such a valuable technology be used in plain sight?
Originally posted by xman_in_blackx
Originally posted by Darkpr0
If the aircraft was invisible it could not have cast a shadow due to the physics of light.
If you saw a shadow, you could have seen the plane. If you didn't see it, then either the shadow was from something else, or you merely weren't looking in the right direction.
It is possible that if the aircraft existed, the second it flew over you it activated its cloaking mechanism, but why would such a valuable technology be used in plain sight?
It depends on the technology used to camouflage the aircraft. LED's for example if used around the aircraft would only make it appear that it was the exact color of the sky above it, but since LED is limited on brightness, it would be impossible for it to fill in the shadow that was being cast.
I remember seeing a technology show where they used lights to make a tank vanish from a hill. This was technology used in WWII. LCD or other panels could be used. This is not outside of possibility at all. Anyone could replicate this if you had enough money for LED panels or backlit LCDs for varying contrast.
Darkpr0, I am afraid your assumption may be wrong.
Originally posted by asmeone2
Honestly, I think I saw an invisible airplane.
Has anyone else experienced something like this?
Edit to add: My theory is that it was covered with the fiber-optic stuff that makes an object seem invisible, I can't beleive I forgot to say that...
[edit on 25-8-2008 by asmeone2]
I dont think it is wrong. Going by the OP statement wich is that the object was invisble. Its not possible for an invisible object to cast a shadow.
What you just described is a comoflauged object. Not an invisible object.
If its camoflauged to blend in with the sky thats one thing. Invisible is something completly different. I think thats what was meant by "an invisible object cant cast a shadow." because an invisible object cant cast a shadow, but a disguised object can. This is where me and Dark's objection comes from.
Do you see what I mean?
by the way,I do think its suspicious that the OP has chaned his story now from invisible to disguised. awfully convienient if you ask me.
[edit on 25-8-2008 by gimme_some_truth]
You did a brave thing coming forward to ask questions on your sighting. Some people will try to ridicule you. Don't let their ignorance stop your quest for truth.
It has been many years since I saw (or didn't see) something similar. Shadow, but no aircraft. I grew up next to the flightline on an Air Force base. I know all the aircraft and their flight characteristics. I have been to many air shows and still love to watch aircraft any time I can. What I saw was the shadow of a propeller driven plane, with no plane in the sky. The shadow I saw was only the width of a two lane road so it wasn't too far up.
I have pondered what I saw for a long time and have concluded that it must have been lighted all around to remove contrast and the lights would have needed to have been able to change color immediately. LED was my first guess. LCD or plasma panels were my second guess, but plasma panels have issues at high altitude, so they would have to be ruled out. LCD would require VERY bright backlights so for the sake of electricity economy, LED would be the best solution to reproduce it.
Just my experience and opinion.
Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
If its camoflauged to blend in with the sky thats one thing. Invisible is something completly different. I think thats what was meant by "an invisible object cant cast a shadow." because an invisible object cant cast a shadow, but a disguised object can. This is where me and Dark's objection comes from.
Do you see what I mean?
by the way,I do think its suspicious that the OP has chaned his story now from invisible to disguised. awfully convienient if you ask me.
[edit on 25-8-2008 by gimme_some_truth]
Originally posted by asmeone2
I think you have the same question about hearing it, too, because low-flying propeller driven craft can be easily heard most of the time, too.
I don't think it is wrong. Going by the OP statement wich is that the object was invisble. Its not possible for an invisible object to cast a shadow.
I don't remember whether I heard sound or not. I just remember looking up and thinking "that plane was damn close but where the hell is it?"
I can only tell you what I can remember. Since I love to watch planes, it grabbed my attention. Probably most people wouldn't have given a second thought or glance.