Diebold comes clean, admits voting machines are faulty, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 50 times


reply posted on 26-8-2008 @ 07:12 PM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by Skyfloating


In the late1950's, I went to a school in Brooklyn to vote. When the greeter, who wore a Democrat pin, heard my Irish name, she said, "he is one of us". When I entered the voting booth, intending to vote the Conservative line, the lever would not work. The only lever that would work was the Democratic one. I did not vote at all. This means votes could be controlled from outside the booth.


reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 02:16 PM by MemoryShock
reply to post by usetobelieve3



I would think that the more basic a program is, the more likely it is to work. Which would be the point for ATMs.

If there is a major and complex system of commands that is accessed everytime someone wanted to withdraw money, then there would be a higher liklihood of people having issues...which is counterintuitive to the entire concept.

So where are the flaws coming from?

Voting machines should be easier, as they are merely taking input and sending it.

The voting process is a scam and if they are citing programming issues than those issues are stemming from additional programming that is not in the best interest of the people.

[edit on 4-9-2008 by MemoryShock]
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^