9/11 conspiracy claims debunked

Scientists with the National Institute of Standards and Technology say their three-year investigation of the collapse determined the demise of WTC 7 was actually the first time in the world a "fire" caused the total failure of a modern skyscraper.

“The reason for the collapse of World Trade Center 7 is no longer a mystery,” said Dr. Shyam Sunder, the lead investigator on the NIST team.

9/11 solved

It was not the government,
it was not a ufo,
it was not a missle,
it was not a laser,
it was not a bomb,

it was a FIRE.

can we please end this conspiracy before somebody gets offended by it?


[edit on 22-8-2008 by SuperSlovak]

reply to post by SuperSlovak


Do we need to make the search feature mandatory before we start threads?
There are no less than 3 on this topic.

reply to post by schrodingers dog


That is a great idea.

The search function should be mandatory in most forums other than ones such as "rant" or "chit chat". I second that idea.

Originally posted by SuperSlovak

Scientists with the National Institute of Standards and Technology say their three-year investigation of the collapse determined the demise of WTC 7 was actually the first time in the world a "fire" caused the total failure of a modern skyscraper.

“The reason for the collapse of World Trade Center 7 is no longer a mystery,” said Dr. Shyam Sunder, the lead investigator on the NIST team.

9/11 solved

it was a FIRE.

can we please end this conspiracy before somebody gets offended by it?

Well there is a lie right there - it wasn't the first - it was the THIRD!

WTC2 and WTC1 were the first and second buildings to collapse due to fire, respectively.

* First time is an accident
* Second time is co-incidence
* Third time is deliberate.

Doesn't the implication of these findings scare you at all? If you think that CTs surrounding these collapses are BS and the OS is true, why aren't you screaming "OMG!" and demanding that all buildings be assessed for fire suppression effectiveness?

You're there saying these buildings collapsed so quickly purely due to fire, yet you aren't bothered in the slightest that if true, it means that any high-rise building in existence could collapse catastrophically simply because a single beam failed??????????????

The lack of logic is frightening.

It's BS because plenty of other buildings have raged on fire for days, and were and are still standing now.

The explanation for the collapses are so preposterous that people are oblivious to what it actually means.

NIST have scientifically determined that any high rise building could GLOBALLY collapse due to fire in just a small part of the building, and for merely a matter of minutes (hmm... 8 hours for WTC7?).



It must be BS, because it is the ONLY building to collapse due to fire. NIST even say so. It just so happens that WTC7 is actually the THIRD such building to collapse due to fire, but the problem is that WTC2 and WTC1 were the 1st and 2nd, and they all happened to collapse on the same day - 9/11.

If you can't see the obvious, there is no hope.

Technically speaking, everyone should be scared of high-rise buildings now, but because these explanations are lies and are not based on scientific fact, these reports will be forgotten, some window dressing might go on regarding building codes and standards for fire, but crucially NOTHING WILL BE DONE ABOUT EXISTING BUILDINGS, OR FUNDAMENTAL BUILDING DESIGN (the bit Joe Public don't understand or won't even think twice about).



It's sad that the population at large can be deceived so seriously.

[edit on 23-8-2008 by mirageofdeceit]

Nothing here has not been debunked!
The OP must be dreaming!
NIST fail to tell the truth and show the truth.

Originally posted by SuperSlovak
The reason for the collapse of World Trade Center 7 is no longer a mystery,” said Dr. Shyam Sunder, the lead investigator on the NIST team

Sorry but the latest NIST report has already been debunked by an earlier NIST report that states that they failed to recover any steel from building 7 for testing.

Why does NIST keep comming out with contridicting reports?