And as par for Bout Time
, the diversion to "here and now"? How ironic, indeed. Do you still not
openly admit that Clinton and his
presidential goons, err, administration continually preached that they knowingly, and admittedly, and continually stated that Iraq/Saddam had WMD?
That they were also developing them also?!
Do you, Bout Time, also openly deny
that the president of the previous administration, along
with virtually every Democrat, including JOHN KERRY
expressly stated and believed, up to the day of the Second Iraq War, that Iraq/Saddam had
WMD........along with the defunct United Nation's, France, Germany, Spain, Russia, etc., etc (their intelligence reports/documentations on this is
open and public knowledge, mind you).?!
Admit it, won't hurt ya in the least bit.
(Without digging up my old links on this)
Clinton Believes-January 2004
Further Clinton Belief
Oh, look! Clinton's believed in the Saddam/Iraq and Al-Qaeda
Clinton has no doubts that Saddam will use WMD again
The Democrats' WMD fraud
To many more links on Clinton's
belief of WMD in Iraq
[Edited on 17-3-2004 by Seekerof]
Hey dude, how can I make my avatar's do that funky white out thing? Looks good!
Can Bush, even after his only term is nearly complete, ever stand on his own two feet and be judged on his merits, without a Clinton reference, in
I've argued the facts of why you're wrong on this point on several back & forths, so let me impart a simple perspective to save the link look up
tedium: agreement on an environmental situation is subject to change as more information is uncovered and that environment is further explored. So a
"YES" in 1997 versus a "YES" in 2003 can be completely different.
Different points of history, different levels of inspection. It's not any more difficult than that
and no, I won't go back & say Clinton lied
- he did not manipulate intel....Bush did and launched a multi billion dollar fiasco through that manipulation, as chronicled in this report by this