Obama Citizenship: Lawsuit Filed To Stop Him From Running, page 9


Pages: <<  6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 16 times


reply posted on 24-10-2008 @ 05:26 PM by redhatty
reply to post by sos37



You can follow the status on this blog

Which for the most part is not overtly biased


reply posted on 25-10-2008 @ 10:08 AM by ZindoDoone
reply to post by sos37



Just so everybody knows what one looks like heres a copy of an original vault Hawaiian birth certificate from 1963:

snarkybytes.com...

They need to check the ink to make sure its the type used when Barry's was signed. Inks have changed greatly since the 60's!! Most where signed with a fountain pen.

Zindo



reply posted on 25-10-2008 @ 12:42 PM by netwarrior
The judge threw out Berg's lawsuit. Read at Berg's lawsuit

Judge rejects Montco lawyer's bid to have Obama removed from ballot

By MICHAEL HINKELMAN
Philadelphia Daily News

hinkelm@phillynews.com 215-854-2656
A federal judge in Philadelphia last night threw out a complaint by a Montgomery County lawyer who claimed that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was not qualified to be president and that his name should be removed from the Nov. 4 ballot.

Philip J. Berg alleged in a complaint filed in federal district court on Aug. 21 against Obama, the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission, that Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya.

Berg claimed that the Democratic presidential standardbearer is not even an American citizen but a citizen of Indonesia and therefore ineligible to be president.

He alleged that if Obama was permitted to run for president and subsequently found to be ineligible, he and other voters would be disenfranchised.

U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick had denied Berg's request for a temporary restraining order on Aug. 22 but had not ruled on the merits of the suit until yesterday.

Obama and the Democratic National Committee had asked Surrick to dismiss Berg's complaint in a court filing on Sept. 24.

They said that Berg's claims were "ridiculous" and "patently false," that Berg had "no standing" to challenge the qualifications of a candidate for president because he had not shown the requisite harm to himself.

Surrick agreed.

In a 34-page memorandum and opinion, the judge said Berg's allegations of harm were "too vague and too attenuated" to confer standing on him or any other voters. *snip*


Oh well. It was a nice dream while it lasted.
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^