It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Engineers what is your take on NIST report on WTC7?

page: 2
7
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 18 2017 @ 06:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958




Are you an engineer?
Yes I am.




posted on May, 18 2017 @ 08:47 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

Ok, I'll alert a mod and see what good it does.

Thanks for the tip.

I was tired of you repeatedly copying & posting lengthy quotes without sourcing any of it anyway.
edit on 18-5-2017 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 08:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

What legal action has engineers taken to have the "white washed" reports and "pseudoscience" corrected and retracted.

Funny you still ignore a court case involving insurance companies and WTC 7. The insurance companies lost the case in their claim the owners and designers of WTC7 were negligent.

I have provided you links to the engineering reports and findings of the case over and over again.

Another item you choose to ignore.



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 09:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: Informer1958




Are you an engineer?
Yes I am.


What kind of engineer?



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 09:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: Informer1958




Are you an engineer?
Yes I am.


What kind of engineer?
I'm an Accredited Engineer with professional accreditations and I belong to an association of professionals, two of them actually, thats all you are getting.



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 09:16 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

LOL. Just as I thought.



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 09:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Informer1958

Are you an engineer?



FYI, he's not an architectural engineer. A bit of googling proves it.



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 09:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: D8Tee

LOL. Just as I thought.
I don't care if you don't believe me, really, it's none of your business and you have no right to be asking me personal questions in the first place.

I know who I am, what do you want me to do post pictures of my certification here?

Not going to happen.

The subject of this thread is not me, I was asked if I was an Engineer, to which I correctly responded, yes.



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 09:22 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

Sure I do. You claimed you were an engineer in a thread asking for opinions from architectural/building engineers.



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 09:27 PM
link   
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Curious to know as to how you found my discipline, I wasn't aware I had disclosed that.

Source?



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 09:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Curious to know as to how you found my discipline...


I didn't. I was bluffing. But this comment confirms your discipline & license is definitely not architectural/building engineering.

It was an easy bluff.

From what I googled...I would guess chemical or environmental...or just mental.



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 09:54 PM
link   
a reply to: MotherMayEye


LOL. Just as I thought.


I was thinking the same. LOL



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 09:57 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee


it's none of your business and you have no right to be asking me personal questions in the first place.


Well, you must be some kind of special something then. Because you had no problems questioning me on why I had an old ATS account, why was that your business in the first place?



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 10:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: D8Tee


it's none of your business and you have no right to be asking me personal questions in the first place.


Well, you must be some kind of special something then. Because you had no problems questioning me on why I had an old ATS account, why was that your business in the first place?


On forums, I always watch out for people with multiple accounts, learned that a long time ago.

Multiple accounts are usually a violation of conditions, not sure how ATS handles that.



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 10:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: D8Tee

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: D8Tee


it's none of your business and you have no right to be asking me personal questions in the first place.


Well, you must be some kind of special something then. Because you had no problems questioning me on why I had an old ATS account, why was that your business in the first place?


On forums, I always watch out for people with multiple accounts, learned that a long time ago.

Multiple accounts are usually a violation of conditions, not sure how ATS handles that.



As long as the person does not talk to themselves i think it is ok



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 10:17 PM
link   
a reply to: stonerwilliam


As long as the person does not talk to themselves i think it is ok


Thank you.


I believe he was looking for dirt, "hoping" he could get me banned.



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 10:18 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee


Multiple accounts are usually a violation of conditions, not sure how ATS handles that.


I would suggest you contact the Mods about this?



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 10:19 PM
link   
a reply to: stonerwilliam

And seriously...the moniker 'Cashlink' hasn't signed on since 2009...'Informer' didn't join until 2013. He's not talking to himself. His story that he lost his login info and created a new account totally checks out and is completely understandable.

The same thing actually happened to me.



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 10:26 PM
link   
MOD NOTE

Does anyone remember the topic here

You are responsible for your own posts.


Please return to the topic :

Engineers what is your take on NIST report on WTC7?



and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!

edit on Thu May 18 2017 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 19 2017 @ 03:34 AM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

Just going to ignore the entire Aegis Insurance vs WTC 7 court case! I inject an actual topic relevant to debate, and its ignored by you because you choose to engage in personal attacks.

www.metabunk.org...


So your claim to be on ATS for debate is another form of intellectual dishonesty!



new topics

top topics



 
7
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join