Made an ass out of myself

You had me at hello...

No worries, whatukno...

reply to post by MemoryShock

---

Thank you Shock, I really appreciate that

Thats just funny....sweet and funny

And WUK your humility makes me love you even more *pinches WUKs cheeks*

i've never possessed this.

My other thread got closed, just wanna say I wasn't making fun of anyone, I was just playing around, I have no idea what the story is in this thread, so I can't really make fun of something I don't know about lol.

I just foed whatuknow 3 times as a joke, then I felt a little bad, so then I remembered this thread and thought it would be funny to make a similar one.

Oh well.

[edit on 22-8-2008 by _Phoenix_]

reply to post by _Phoenix_

---

Foeing someone 3 times isn't really a public apology sort of thing. Being a total ass behind peoples backs is (like I was).

Besides everyone knows I can take a joke. Parody me, make fun, heck you can openly ridicule me. Thats all good.

Now making fun of someones legitimate and sincere apology? Not too cool, .

But its all good.

reply to post by whatukno

---

Anyone can screw up..

Takes a Man to admit it...

Kudos

Semper

Wasn't making fun of it, I just used it, just a bad joke.

No harm meant.



[edit on 23-8-2008 by _Phoenix_]

[edit on 23-8-2008 by Lysergic]

lately wuk's been trying to instigate a debate with me. if we ever do debate, he'll make an ass out of himself yet again.

reply to post by LordInfamous

---

it's ok to admit your scared lord. It really is.

reply to post by whatukno

---

i'll continue to say what i've been saying ALL along.

1. you're NOT an intimidating dude.

2. psychological warefare IS NOT effective if the person you're trying to use it on, keeps laughing at it.

reply to post by semperfortis

---

hmmm, that's very interesting. but in my case, it's not true. i'm laughing due to the fact he really believes he can get@me.

edit to add that i'm also laughing at him because he really believes he's intimidating, and that his debate skills are good. when the last time i checked, his stats were horrible.

[edit on 23-8-2008 by LordInfamous]

reply to post by LordInfamous

---

really? my stats are horrible? hmm I don't know about that. I have lost some matches, but I have also won some too. I wonder.

either way my stats will beat yours if you join up cause you will be at the bottom of the totem pole as it were.

what makes you so sure of this, and who's gassing your head up.

reply to post by LordInfamous

---

You do know how to read the stats don't you? You might want to check. that last comment, you might want to translate into English, gassing my head up? I have yet to have heard that one.

edit to add i misunderstood your first comment. so just disregard my response to it. however, when i asked you who's gassing your head up, what i meant was, who's really making you believe that if you debate me, you'll win.

[edit on 23-8-2008 by LordInfamous]

[edit on 23-8-2008 by LordInfamous]

Ok, now it is my turn to apologize. I made an ass out of myself, too! To stay true to the Jerry Maguire theme, Wukky might have had Memory Shock at 'Hello' but I pulled a 'Jerry Maguire' in front of the whole office and 'flipped out,' briefcase firmly in hand!

My sincere apologies. Fortunately I had a friend on here who took an hour out of their day to talk to me on IM and who put things into perspective.

Anyways, I am so sorry to everyone. I hope everyone can forgive me and I won't be bringing it up again. I'm sorry.

---

Now on a lighter note, I hereby dub this thread the official 'I made an ass out of myself on ATS and want to apologize' thread. We can even start selling 'short-fuse' indulgences at 1,000 points a pop.



[edit on 8/27/2008 by AshleyD]

My issue with whatukno was with an uncharacteristic accusation in a debate. Notgood sportsmanship. Easily fixed, as he felt unsure of the rules, though I wish that he had just followed suit. The character limit is being reinstated for the second round on.

My issue with Ashley, is bsed on a very public rant on how she was 'slighted'. The implicit message being broadcast was that her opinion and presentation trumps that of three other people who have in the past shown objective perspectives towards other views. The reason we have debates is because most facts can be disputed.

The Debate Forum is an organized setting to discuss and contend various topics. It is in no means the end all be all, despite the fact that it has one of the most (implicitly) strict expectations upon its' participants.

Truth be told, I didn't read that last post beyond the first sentence, which stated that you were responding to questions you received about the judgment. Really. The thread was closed on the intent of that first sentence. I saw no need to entertain 'their' opinions. If I did, we might as well have done this in the Conspiracies in Religion forum.

Apology accepted, Ashley.

I lost sleep on this debate, by the way...