reply to post by marg6043
Certainly. I suppose this is at the crux of my post. It is easy for us to point our finger at the president, who is really nothing more than a figure
head, but the internal workings of the machinization are hidden.
Like I have said before, people always say, "Well, Bush stutters and stammers." My reply to that is quite simple, "You'd stutter and stammer too,
if you were in a predicament where you had to makee excuses for other people's mishaps."
I really don't see, excepting the financial benefit, the ruckuss over being presidet. Anyone who has a basic understanding of civics and the way the
U.S government is operated knows that the president's power is rather limited. Congress calls the shots.
The president has a veto, which is only a half of a vote and he can let a bill die, but other than that, his power is relatively limited. Even if he
allows a bill to die, it can always be revitalized by congress.