It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Cancellation
The success of Project Apollo in putting American astronauts on the Moon in 1969 put the United States ahead in the Space race, and that was the deathblow to the Soviet moon program, although plans were drawn up until the early 1970s. Four N-1 launches were attempted but all were failures, despite engineering improvements after each crash. The second launch attempt on 3 July 1969, just 13 days prior to the launch of Apollo 11, was a catastrophic failure which destroyed both the rocket and the launch complex. Subsequently, the Soviets decided to concentrate on the development of space stations, gaining several firsts in the process, and also a long-term Mars program, which continues to the present day.
The MSFN operators absolutely can't be fooled by a satellite. Their antennas must be precisely aimed, and a satellite doesn't follow the same path in the sky as an outbound or inbound Apollo spacecraft. They'd know. Their ability to locate the spacecraft in the sky is nothing short of legendary. They took great pride in being able to use the Doppler shift of the radio signal to determine the flight path of the spacecraft. When compared later with flight records, the MSFN ground station operators were proud to have observed motion of the spacecraft due to such subtle effects as waste dumps and sublimator operation.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by redled
Why would they have to have been second? They could have faked it before the USA did.
Surely they had as much if not more incentive as the USA. They were ahead during the early part of the Space Race. When the USA started catching up, a faked landing would have maintained their lead. The propaganda value would have been huge. Faking it would have been cheaper than doing it.
c) the sheer number of people involved in the "real" effort was so huge that the truth would probably be impossible to contain anyway!
Originally posted by Phage
Is it not true that the KGB could have dealt with anyone coming forth with the truth, turning them into an "unperson".
Originally posted by buddhasystem
In addition, eliminating (many) thousands of (talented) people who are reponsible for your ballistic missile program hardly seems like a wise move under any regime.