It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jackinthebox
reply to post by re22666
If we stopped using cars today wnet back to horse and buggy, do you think there would be anyone who could run a NASCAR race in fifty years? It would take some work to re-introduce the technology I'm sure.
Originally posted by mapsurfer_
Originally posted by badmedia
The problem as someone else mentioned is that the particles don't follow that pattern. They go up, stop and fall back down. But unless there is an atmosphere on the moon, then the dust should fall at the same rate and the arc should be the same radius from start to finish. Instead they go up, stop and fall back down.
It is commonly known in physics that the weight of something does not at all matter in how fast it falls. All objects fall at the same speed. The reason 1 object might fall faster than another is due to the atmosphere and friction on the way down.
I cannot tell you exactly how reduced gravity might effect flying soil, but let us bring your argument to earth. How do you suppose they accomplished this hoaxed effect here on this planet?
I am not sure where you took your physics course, but yes a feather falls slower than a brick. Weight certainly does have bearing on how fast an object falls, and all objects do NOT fall at the same speed.
The fact that is strange gravitational effects on the moon should be of no surprise. The real question is.. how would they do accomplish these effects if they were filmed in hollywood?
Originally posted by mapsurfer_
Hello? Is your assertion that the lunar mission are a hoax predication on this information? So how might that effect be accomplished within our own atmosphere. Seriously the strange effect of the falling soil only support the that of the lunar environment, and not indicative of earth.
Originally posted by infolurker
I hate to say it guys.
If the moon landing was faked, the Soviets definitely and maybe the chi coms would have disclosed it decades ago.
Originally posted by AntisepticSkeptic
I doubt this show is going to change the minds of fake-moon-landing-'conspiracists'. For them EVERYTHING IS A COVERUP, and it seems that the MythBusters show is making to their infinite list of coverups.
No scientific evidence, no matter how compelling can convince them that we did land on the moon. In my opinion they are simply idiots who don't have the mental capability to understand and grasp any scientific explanation to explain ANYTHING.
All the crazies have to declare in retaliation to this show is "It was a coverup!" and they would think those word are enough to refute all the compelling evidence of more than 39 years. Even on this thread some people are saying the show is somekind of a NWO coverup with NOTHING to back it up.
I might as well say: "I farted on my way to the toilet, I can't explain what trigerred it SO THIS MUST BE A GOVERNMENT COVERUP!"
[edit on 22-8-2008 by AntisepticSkeptic]
Originally posted by Copernicus
I have no doubt we went there, but the astronauts are not able to tell us what they really saw, and the videos are filmed in a studio.
Neil Armstrong about the layers of truth:
[edit on 21-8-2008 by Copernicus]
Originally posted by badmediaWhy is it that you need to group everyone into 1 category, and then pick on the worse of that group and lay it on the rest?
And then of course, compare it to something silly and stupid to imply that it fits the bill for the rest.
In your entire post the only thing you did was call people names and make personal attacks. No serious discussion, didn't try and provide proof or even make a rebuttals to a claim made. Just personal attacks.
[edit on 22-8-2008 by badmedia]
Originally posted by dunwichwitch
Pride is mental trap. I didn't go the moon. I wouldn't be proud if I did. That's egotism, and it's a blinding trait to have. Pride is ignorance.
This is like saying "shut up and be patriotic because freedom is seemingly impossible in this world", and the USA is so great because we've managed to beat the rest of the world down enough to maintain our big fatass lardo corporately chained pseudo-freedom.
Maintain your pride. See how much it costs you. Knowledge of something bigger, better, and more important than your pride is the price you pay.
Originally posted by rocksarerocks
reply to post by re22666
What would you like NASA to do, use the old APOLLO technology and computers that are like calculators?
You do realize as technology gets better they have to reinvent how they are going to do everything. EVERYTHING is going to change.
YOu do also realize with your comments that the shuttle is not designed to leave earth orbit, so how does that have anything whatsoever to do with landing on the moon?
[edit on 22-8-2008 by rocksarerocks]
You do realize as technology gets better they have to reinvent how they are going to do everything. EVERYTHING is going to change.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by re22666
Your link didn't work but I did find what I think is the video in question.
A thought experiment, since we can't go to the moon right now. I also searched all over for a ballistics simulator to play with but couldn't find one so this will have to do. Take a ball, give it a toss on earth, note how high it travels before tracing a gentle arc back to the surface. Now take that ball to the moon, give it a toss with the same amount of energy. Since there is reduced gravity on the moon that ball will reach a higher point before it traces that arc. Oh, and that arc will be wider as well as higher. If you deny this then you might as well stop reading now (I really wish I could find that simulator).
This higher and wider than expected (on Earth) ballistic arc is what I see on the clip. Honestly. I don't see the dust doing anything but going higher, slower over the top, and wider than our Earth conditioned expectations would have it do. We've grown up learning how a ball flies in Earth's gravity. My guess is we would have a hard time playing ball on the moon because thrown things behave so differently there. We "know" how high a ball is going to go when thrown at a given speed at a given angle. We "know" the arc it's going to follow. What we "know" on Earth doesn't work on the moon.
Now, I've watched and watched that clip trying to see what you describe but I just don't see it. Yes the "hang time" is longer than I would expect on Earth but it doesn't stop up there. It just takes a while to lose the upward velocity and regain it's downward velocity. It's not air that's doing it, it's the shape of the arc. The arc is going to happen on Earth or Moon but it won't be the same arc.
[edit on 22-8-2008 by Phage]
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by re22666
No, the dust particles don't spread out because of the atmosphere. They spread out because each one is on it's own ballistic trajectory. Each dust particle leaves from a different point on the wheel. Each one gets sent on it's merry way from the wheel in a slightly different direction at a slightly different speed at a slightly different moment in time. This is why they do not all follow exactly the same path. Along each path, each particle is very likely to bump other particles, causing it to deviate a bit but for the most part yes, each one is following a classic ballistic curve.
Yes, this is ballistics. Ballistics is the science of objects in motion. This is not particle physics. Particle physics is the science of subatomic particles. You can't really be thinking the dust is composed of loose protons, neutrons, and electrons. Dust particles may be small but they are not that small.
Yes, it looks a lot like a roostertail from a boat because almost the exactly same thing is happening. Water drops are being ejected at slightly different directions and speeds, thus they spread out. It isn't air that's causing it.
[edit on 22-8-2008 by Phage]