Originally posted by mlmijyd

Without doubt this particular film inside the spaceship proves that they were not at the moon but not very far from earth. It was obvious that the light was indeed the Earth and they were faking this particular part of the trip. Now did they go to the moon? May be but all the astronauts were/are still involved in the cover-up of what they were really up to?


[edit on 1-9-2008 by mlmijyd]

Can any of these believers explain why they were faking their distance from the earth three days out and how they made it to the moon from earth's orbit just a few hours later for real where they could have just taken the footage for real?

NASA claim they went to the moon several times.

BUT when asked to do it again, they cannot reproduce the same results they allegedly produced decades ago..

wind blowing on the 'moon' , camera's allegedly used to take footage on the moon that was not shielded for radiation nor extreme cold, shadows falling at several angles in one shot, 'astronauts' photographed in shadow showing as if standing in bright daylight, reflections in 'space' helmets showing multiple light sources, no trace of a blast pit underneath any lunar lander, no engine noise in footage showing a 'landing' from inside the 'lander', the Van Allen belt, I could go on for quite some time..

there's a movie on youtube somewhere called 'What really happened on the moon?' (which lasts about 3 hours) showing off several of these anomalys.

The thread starter says this theory 'started' in the 90's, which is simply not true.. it did spread the theory further, but the lunar landings have allways been contested..

Just curious but did this thread die because mythbusters is just entertainment and would never really tackle the truly telling issues or go against the word of the companies that own the show who stand to gain by maitaining the government lead status quo, or because it is easier to prove it was a hoax than it is to prove it was real no matter what the truth is?

There would have had to be way too many people involved to create a conspiracy to fake the moon landings. Reliable people would eventually have talked and it just hasn't happened. I think it's crazy for people to pick that as a conspiracy theory to believe in quite honestly and I find it insulting.

The Moon Conspiracy had to be used to as another example
of TPTB getting their way.
Putting their greedy ambitions ahead of human safety.
Ten years of government spending for a grand idea to keep
scientists on the government payrolls.
Which was needed perhaps still back in the 50s.
As long a Von Braun was around NASA needed him because
he knew of the ether scientists.
The ether scientists have no power now.
Either real or a show the project was completed and as long as
an ounce of doubt can be raised the ripoff gets attention.
The problem is if the mission was determined to be impossible
how would the alternate mission go down.
Simulation was going on since day one in the planning.
One way or another Operation Paper Clip people got paid.

Originally posted by Tiamanicus
Just curious but did this thread die because mythbusters is just entertainment and would never really tackle the truly telling issues or go against the word of the companies that own the show who stand to gain by maitaining the government lead status quo, or because it is easier to prove it was a hoax than it is to prove it was real no matter what the truth is?

I couldn't agree with you more. It seems to me from the few shows I have watched that all it is is entertainment. My gut feeling is they couldn't care less proving anything. All that matters to people like this is ratings and I guess they work under certain restraints that obligate them not to rock the boat. I learn't more about the moon hoax here on ATS and got more or less what I expected from this useless waste of space called myth-busters. In my opinion they will be the first against the wall when the revolution comes. Thanks for not letting the thread die all..

peace

daz