Computer games industry threat to downloaders: 'pay up or we'll sue', page
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times
Topic started on 20-8-2008 @ 07:03 PM by wheresthetruth

Computer games industry threat to downloaders: 'pay up or we'll sue'


technology.timesonline.co.uk
The computer games industry has launched an unprecedented assault on illegal downloads, demanding payment from thousands of families who obtained the latest releases over the internet without paying.

Five of the world’s top games developers will serve notice on 25,000 people across the UK, requiring each one to pay £300 immediately to settle out of court.
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.theregister.co.uk
arstechnica.com
www.paidcontent.co.uk

Mod Edit: Breaking News Forum Submission Guidelines – Please Review This Link.


[edit on 20/8/2008 by Mirthful Me]


reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 07:32 PM by Maxmars
reply to post by ZindoDoone



Whats your take on the following notion of mine?

Information, however you encapsulate it, cannot be controlled. In fact, the point of a medium to exists is to carry information, and like highways, the more lanes you put in, the more traffic you get. Some percentage of that information will inevitable be proscribed. In this case, they were more concerned about those are nickle and diming them by playing without paying. I suspect that the increase in what they see as stealing is the very same as it always was, taken as a function of global bandwidth consumption.

((The real culprit however, is an entire overseas industry that makes this stuff available (unless I am mistaken).))

But no matter who the culprits are, it is absolutely inevitable. People will communicate, trade, share, and otherwise excersize their own judgment about anything they come to posses, and no amount of 'user agreement stipulation' is going to change that. No medium is safe, no encryption unbreakable, no amount of 'clever' that another more clever cannot overcome.


reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 07:36 PM by ZindoDoone
reply to post by Maxmars



Max,
I agree. Its all in the ethics of the end users. If your going to become a crook then you will....if caught!!! When I was a kid I used my tape recorder and made miles of tape of music I liked and kept it for years. I would send copies of tapes to my buddies in the jungle so they could hear the latest when they felt like it instead of having to wait for Rabbit to go on the air!LOL!!!


Zindo


reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 07:48 PM by Orion Crystal Ice

When I stop getting gouged $20 for a cd with maybe 3 good songs, and stop paying a royalty on every blank cd, I will stop downloading music.


Ouch, that really hurts. I, for one, can prioritize a purchase, but I understand some of us can't and therefore demand that all prices go down to suit our needs.

By the way, ever hear of amazon.com, or myspace? Lots of stuff on there to hear from hundreds of thousands of albums, and reviews to match, before you buy anything.


Music . . . the label gets most of the money. Want to support an artist? Go see them live and buy their merchandise. That is how they make money that the label can't touch.


Yeah. I did mention people not going to the show being part of the problem. Do you realize though that a CD registers as a 'unit' sold? And those units help establish where a fanbase is? And a band who wants to look out for their money and expanding their base does not want to risk playing somewhere where there isn't a fanbase that may yield a quarter of itself to the ticket buying?

Also, where do you think marketing money (posters, promo copies for reviewers, etc), money to pay the artist who did the work on the CD face, the CD booklet, and the CD cover, money to pay the photographer, money to manufacture the CD's, money to pay the engineer and recording studio, etc...all comes from? What about the best gear money can buy, which is the standard for putting on a professional show that will make you money in the future from repeat concertgoers, where's alllllllllll that money coming from?

?

Why not get rid of your house and car too, the factory workers and builders don't make as much as the fat cats do. It would be better just to take ALL the money out of their pockets. Books..who needs them? Let's completely abolish the printing press, too much $$$ changing hands. It's just not fair that we have to pay for anything since we have the Internet and the real world has suddenly converted into an anarchic utopia.

[edit on 20-8-2008 by Orion Crystal Ice]


reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 08:10 PM by ZindoDoone
reply to post by EnlightenUp



I agree. The albums for the most part have two hooks and the rest filler. I miss the old days that had at least 5 "A" songs and the rest at least B+!!

Zindo



reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 08:12 PM by Andrew E. Wiggin
reply to post by EnlightenUp



very good poitn enlightenup

to further that idea

lets say person A copies software and distributes it to 300 different people

thats 300 cpies of the same license out on the black market

why should the software company be entitled to restitutions for all 300 illegally downloaded copies...if it only lost out on - say - one sale?


reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 08:15 PM by Andrew E. Wiggin
reply to post by TallWhites



but if they sign that contract, now the software company can come after them with full steam.


there's no way in hell they'd sign that contract.


reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 08:22 PM by xxpigxx

Ouch, that really hurts. I, for one, can prioritize a purchase, but I understand some of us can't and therefore demand that all prices go down to suit our needs.

By the way, ever hear of amazon.com, or myspace? Lots of stuff on there to hear from hundreds of thousands of albums, and reviews to match, before you buy anything.


The point still stands that the money goes to the record company . . . not the artist.

With Myspace . . . more like more trash to go through to find the diamond.

As for prioritizing . . . what in the Hades does that have to do with anything?


Yeah. I did mention people not going to the show being part of the problem. Do you realize though that a CD registers as a 'unit' sold? And those units help establish where a fanbase is? And a band who wants to look out for their money and expanding their base does not want to risk playing somewhere where there isn't a fanbase that may yield a quarter of itself to the ticket buying?


You tour to build a fanbase. Every artists knows that. That is at the root of getting big.


Also, where do you think marketing money (posters, promo copies for reviewers, etc), money to pay the artist who did the work on the CD face, the CD booklet, and the CD cover, money to pay the photographer, money to manufacture the CD's, money to pay the engineer and recording studio, etc...all comes from? What about the best gear money can buy, which is the standard for putting on a professional show that will make you money in the future from repeat concertgoers, where's alllllllllll that money coming from?


It comes from the big labels . . . it used to anyways. Now bands can easily do their own professional thing without the label. yet many bands get pulled into the rhetoric spewed by the labels to lure then in . . .



Why not get rid of your house and car too, the factory workers and builders don't make as much as the fat cats do. It would be better just to take ALL the money out of their pockets. Books..who needs them? Let's completely abolish the printing press, too much $$$ changing hands. It's just not fair that we have to pay for anything since we have the Internet and the real world has suddenly converted into an anarchic utopia.


My house was given to me by my parents and I have never owned a new car. Not to mention the fact that a novice can't build a car or house. So your point is moot, as anyone can put together a cd/dvd with liner notes and sell it (which is what the labels do).

When I start getting charged $50 to read The Cat in the Hat, I will start downloading books too. The price of books is fair. The price of CD's is not.

Apples and oranges.

---------------------------

Argue with me all you want . . . but you will not change my mind. I have stated what will get me to buy cd's and movies again. That will not change.

People need to realize that the music and movie scene has changed . . . and the labels are fighting it because they can't scam us like they used to.


reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 08:26 PM by EnlightenUp
reply to post by Andrew E. Wiggin



I think it is natural for the legal team to claim the worst case to maximize the returns in lawsuits. It's impossible to know for sure which proportion would really have been a bonafide sale.

I was just pointing out that the figures given should be adjusted downward a tad (probably a big "tad" these days) in order to approach reality.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 4 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 5 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 4 days ago with 49 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Greetings from a Dying Man
  Introductions, Posted 9 hours ago, 74 replies
Alien Grey caught in photo ?
  Aliens and UFOs, Posted 11 hours ago, 65 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 15 hours ago, 55 replies
Iran sent pink drone to Obama
  World War Three, Posted 16 hours ago, 40 replies