Maybe you have a link to your source?
Bush Bashers are WRONG, page
privacy
Topic started on 20-8-2008 @ 06:32 PM by TXMACHINEGUNDLR
I keep hearing the media tell us of the 4000 plus US military killed in the War on Terror. I also hear about how much better it was with Clinton in
office. Here are some facts.
www.mcforum.net...
Lets use this thread to shoot down the left wingers lies and propaganda with facts.
[edit on 21-8-2008 by Crakeur]
Military Losses, 1980 thru 2007
Whatever your politics, however you lean, and however you feel about the current administration, this report should open some eyes. Military losses, 1980 through 2007.
The annual fatalities of military members while actively serving in the armed forces from 1980 through 2007 - by any cause.
1980 ......... 2,392 ( Carter Year )
1981 .......... 2,380 ( Reagan Year)
1984 .......... 1,999 ( Reagan Year)
1988 .......... 1,819 ( Reagan Year)
1989 .......... 1,636 ( George H W Year )
1990 ......... 1,508 ( George H W Year )
1991 .......... 1,787 ( George H W Year )
1992 .......... 1,293 ( George H W Year )
1993 ...........1,213 ( Clinton Year)
1994 .......... 1,075 ( Clinton Year)
1995 .......... 2,465 ( Clinton Year)
1996 ......... 2,318 ( Clinton Year)
1997 .......... 817 ( Clinton Year)
1998 .......... 2,252 ( Clinton Year)
1999 .......... 1,984 ( Clinton Year)
2000 ...........1,983 ( Clinton Year)
2001 ............. 890( George W Year )
2002 ........... 1,007 ( George W Year )
2003 ........... 1,410 ( George W Year )
2004 .......... 1,887 ( George W Year )
2005 ............. 919 ( George W Year )
2006.............. 920 ( George W Year )
2007.............. 899 ( George W Year )
Clinton years (1993-2000): 14,107 deaths
George W years (2001-2007): 7,932 deaths
www.mcforum.net...
Lets use this thread to shoot down the left wingers lies and propaganda with facts.
[edit on 21-8-2008 by Crakeur]
reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 06:54 PM by benevolent tyrant
Originally posted by Bluess
Maybe you have a link to your source?
While I am not entirely certain as to the source used to ascertain the statistics in the OP, such data is readily obtained.
For instance, you might consider studying the statistics supplied by this source:
CRS Report for Congress This report offers a rather extensive listing of US Military deaths (combat and otherwise).
reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 07:50 PM by Hal9000
reply to post by TXMACHINEGUNDLR
OK, but let’s do this again using your source with military casualties due to hostile action.
From Table 5, on Page 11.
1980 .......... 0 ( Carter Year )
1981 .......... 0 ( Reagan Year)
1982 .......... 0 ( Reagan Year)
1983 .......... 18 ( Reagan Year)
1984 .......... 1 ( Reagan Year)
1985 .......... 0 ( Reagan Year)
1986 .......... 2 ( Reagan Year)
1987 .......... 37 ( Reagan Year)
1988 .......... 0 ( Reagan Year)
1989 .......... 23 ( George H W Year )
1990 .......... 0 ( George H W Year )
1991 .......... 147 ( George H W Year )
1992 .......... 0 ( George H W Year )
1993 ...........0 ( Clinton Year)
1994 .......... 0 ( Clinton Year)
1995 .......... 0 ( Clinton Year)
1996 .......... 1 ( Clinton Year)
1997 .......... 0 ( Clinton Year)
1998 .......... 0 ( Clinton Year)
1999 .......... 0 ( Clinton Year)
2000 ...........0 ( Clinton Year)
2001 .......... 3 ( George W Year )
2002 .......... 18 ( George W Year )
2003 .......... 343 ( George W Year )
2004 .......... 739 ( George W Year )
2005 .......... 739 ( George W Year )
2006 .......... 761 ( George W Year )
2007 .......... Not Listed
Clinton years (1993-2000): 1 death
George W years (2001-2006): 2,603 deaths
There’s a big difference. The number you posted included other causes and most were due to accidents, which were reduced over the years. Other deaths include homicide, suicide, and terrorism. Why didn't you mention that?
Actually, I expected more in 1993 from the Battle of Mogadishu, but I guess that was considered a terrorist attack.
If you are going to use the number of deaths of American soldiers for political reasons, at least try to get your numbers right.
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
OK, but let’s do this again using your source with military casualties due to hostile action.
From Table 5, on Page 11.
1980 .......... 0 ( Carter Year )
1981 .......... 0 ( Reagan Year)
1982 .......... 0 ( Reagan Year)
1983 .......... 18 ( Reagan Year)
1984 .......... 1 ( Reagan Year)
1985 .......... 0 ( Reagan Year)
1986 .......... 2 ( Reagan Year)
1987 .......... 37 ( Reagan Year)
1988 .......... 0 ( Reagan Year)
1989 .......... 23 ( George H W Year )
1990 .......... 0 ( George H W Year )
1991 .......... 147 ( George H W Year )
1992 .......... 0 ( George H W Year )
1993 ...........0 ( Clinton Year)
1994 .......... 0 ( Clinton Year)
1995 .......... 0 ( Clinton Year)
1996 .......... 1 ( Clinton Year)
1997 .......... 0 ( Clinton Year)
1998 .......... 0 ( Clinton Year)
1999 .......... 0 ( Clinton Year)
2000 ...........0 ( Clinton Year)
2001 .......... 3 ( George W Year )
2002 .......... 18 ( George W Year )
2003 .......... 343 ( George W Year )
2004 .......... 739 ( George W Year )
2005 .......... 739 ( George W Year )
2006 .......... 761 ( George W Year )
2007 .......... Not Listed
Clinton years (1993-2000): 1 death
George W years (2001-2006): 2,603 deaths
There’s a big difference. The number you posted included other causes and most were due to accidents, which were reduced over the years. Other deaths include homicide, suicide, and terrorism. Why didn't you mention that?
Actually, I expected more in 1993 from the Battle of Mogadishu, but I guess that was considered a terrorist attack.
If you are going to use the number of deaths of American soldiers for political reasons, at least try to get your numbers right.
As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.
reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 07:53 PM by DMTeed
reply to post by TXMACHINEGUNDLR
LOL, who in the hell would defend George Bush!!! LOL
Lets look at the bigger picture!!!!!!!!!
LOL, who in the hell would defend George Bush!!! LOL
Lets look at the bigger picture!!!!!!!!!
reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 08:44 PM by harvib
reply to post by TXMACHINEGUNDLR
I’m confused by your data that you listed. In the source you provided looking at the table of deaths by year it shows different numbers then you show for some of the years you listed. For example in 1995 you have listed 2,465 according to your source it shows 1,040. In fact there are several years that you seem to have inflated numbers for. What am I missing???
Here are the correct stats using your source
[edit on 21-8-2008 by harvib]
1993 ...........1,213 ( Clinton Year)
1994 .......... 1,075 ( Clinton Year)
1995 .......... 2,465 ( Clinton Year)
1996 ......... 2,318 ( Clinton Year)
1997 .......... 817 ( Clinton Year)
1998 .......... 2,252 ( Clinton Year)
1999 .......... 1,984 ( Clinton Year)
2000 ...........1,983 ( Clinton Year)
I’m confused by your data that you listed. In the source you provided looking at the table of deaths by year it shows different numbers then you show for some of the years you listed. For example in 1995 you have listed 2,465 according to your source it shows 1,040. In fact there are several years that you seem to have inflated numbers for. What am I missing???
Here are the correct stats using your source
Year Total Deaths
1993... 1,213
1994... 1,075
1995... 1,040
1996... 974
1997... 817
1998... 827
1999... 796
2000... 758
2001... 891
[edit on 21-8-2008 by harvib]
reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 08:56 PM by Hal9000
reply to post by harvib
Good catch. I didn't notice that myself. His numbers aren't right even for all military deaths.
Your numbers are right except for
1996 which should be 974, not 1974, and
2001, which should be 891 not 1891.
You should still have time to fix that.
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
Good catch. I didn't notice that myself. His numbers aren't right even for all military deaths.
Your numbers are right except for
1996 which should be 974, not 1974, and
2001, which should be 891 not 1891.
You should still have time to fix that.
As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.
reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 09:10 PM by EvilBat
reply to post by TXMACHINEGUNDLR
Might just want to re-read that source
as others pointed out the numbers are not correct
call me a bush basher or left wing if you want
but reading that looks like clinton
years were better
Might just want to re-read that source
as others pointed out the numbers are not correct
call me a bush basher or left wing if you want
but reading that looks like clinton
years were better
It's just starting too. The whole edifice of lies and propaganda and fear mongering are being exposed. We have actually had our second
Vietnam and something WORSE than Watergate. The lie behind the WMD claim is out in the open and on public record. Sending our military into an
unnecessary war with FORGED evidence is tantamount to treason. 
Breaking News: Judge Doesn\'t Rule, Secretary of State Doesn\'t Agree - Obama NOT off
Posted 14 days ago with 39 member flags
Posted 14 days ago with 39 member flags
Failed US Foreign Policy? Is Ron Paul the Answer? History Says NO!
Posted 19 days ago with 26 member flags
Posted 19 days ago with 26 member flags
On why America is in denial and Ron Paul will not be elected
Posted 16 days ago with 21 member flags
Posted 16 days ago with 21 member flags
As of feb 9th, Canada\'s own version of SOPA: Bill C-11 will kill more of your freedom
Posted 12 days ago with 11 member flags
Posted 12 days ago with 11 member flags
Newest topics, updated in real-time:
Be sure to NOTICE how Threatening they are to YOU!!! Warning Graphic Footage!
US Political Madness, Posted 7 minutes ago
US Political Madness, Posted 7 minutes ago
FALSE FLAG WATCH - US Admits Israel is Arming and Training Terrorist Groups in Iran
War On Terrorism, Posted 59 minutes ago
War On Terrorism, Posted 59 minutes ago
Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:
Fox News to Cut "The Judge". No More "Freedom Watch" Come Feb 20th. I Think We All Know Why.
Education and Media, Posted 14 hours ago, 39 flags
Education and Media, Posted 14 hours ago, 39 flags
US Marines posed with Nazi symbol in Afghanistan
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 13 hours ago, 22 flags
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 13 hours ago, 22 flags
Are you a Fundamentalist Christian? Top ten signs!?
Jokes, Puns, & Pranks, Posted 17 hours ago, 22 flags
Jokes, Puns, & Pranks, Posted 17 hours ago, 22 flags
Here's an update on the "strange metal boxes washed up on Oregon beach"
ATS Skunk Works, Posted 6 hours ago, 12 flags
ATS Skunk Works, Posted 6 hours ago, 12 flags
Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:
US Marines posed with Nazi symbol in Afghanistan
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 13 hours ago, 220 replies
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 13 hours ago, 220 replies
Iran Says US Attack Would Be ‘Akin To Suicide’
Breaking Political News, Posted 6 hours ago, 105 replies
Breaking Political News, Posted 6 hours ago, 105 replies
Again, Democrats Protest Drug Testing for Welfare and Unemployment Recipients...
General Conspiracies, Posted 17 hours ago, 45 replies
General Conspiracies, Posted 17 hours ago, 45 replies
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.194 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.194 seconds
