The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
The adversary's closer to home. It's the Pentagon bureaucracy. Not the people, but the processes. Not the civilians, but the systems. Not the men and women in uniform, but the uniformity of thought and action that we too often impose on them.
In this building, despite this era of scarce resources taxed by mounting threats, money disappears into duplicative duties and bloated bureaucracy—not because of greed, but gridlock. Innovation is stifled—not by ill intent but by institutional inertia.
Just as we must transform America's military capability to meet changing threats, we must transform the way the Department works and what it works on. We must build a Department where each of the dedicated people here can apply their immense talents to defend America, where they have the resources, information and freedom to perform.
As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.
That speech is being taken out of context...
Yes he said the words attack the Pentagon... however it's the bureaucracy that takes place in and with the Pentagon, he wasn't talking about an actual attack.
However, I know, many will dispute this and say it was "code" a warning if you will, but I disagree.
[edit on 20-8-2008 by elevatedone]


