This is an opinion piece which raises some interesting questions:
Has the pharmaceutical industry become the Pied Piper of Hamelin--ridding us of lethal diseases only to turn around and "take" our children?
Would a physician from the 1950s "have identified the frenzy to treat bipolar disorders in infants that developed in twenty-first-century American as
a mania?"
In his latest book, Mania: A Short History of Bipolar Disorder (the John Hopkins University Press) David Healy, author of Let Them Eat Prozac, looks
at the historic roots of our current "medicalized distress" in which half the population is said to suffer a mental illness at some point in life
and babies are diagnosed in utero as bipolar.
Bipolar disorder, once called manic depression, has been embroiled in controversy from its first descriptions in Paris in the 1850s. The
pharmaceutical companies and academics behind its current popularity as a "catch-all" disease say it dates back to the ancient Greeks.
But David Healy, professor of psychiatry and the director of the North Wales Department of Psychological Medicine at Cardiff University, is not so
sure.
References to the frenzied behavior of mental patients found in Hippocrates' Epidemics books 1 and III, Plato's Phaedrus and other early writings
almost certainly referred to infective states and not what we mean by bipolar disorder infective disorders with high fevers, hysteria, postpartum
manias, catalepsies and melancholies developing into manias, he writes.
Even if the disorder existed before direct-to-consumer television advertising beamed its warning signs into living rooms, it was rare says Healy.
Between 1875 and 1924 only 123 patients from North West Wales were admitted to the asylum in North Wales with what we would today call bipolar
disorder from a population of a quarter of a million or 12,500,000 person years.
The discovery of lithium in 1817--so plentiful and inexpensive it was added to soft drinks and beer until 1929--and its value in treating bipolar
disorder in the late 1950s, changed the course of psychopharmacology says Healy.
Lithium not only introduced the concept of a drug that could act as a mood stabilizer-- offering actual prophylaxis against a mental disease--it
introduced the concept of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which a drug's effectiveness is tested against placebo.
Full article
More and more people are becoming concerned about the apparent catch-all diagnoses which has seen depression, bipolar, and ADD/ADHD being diagnosed
and treated with drugs far in excess of anything we have seen before.
The
WHO that over 25% of people will suffer from mental illness at some point in their lives, whilst
other estimates have been put as high as 50%
There is also the conspiracy element here, as drugs for depression and other mental illness have direct links to suicide in some patients - links
which have been supressed by the pharmaceutical companies for fear of harming profit margins:
A Swedish writer has accused the National Board of Health and Welfare (NBHW) of covering up evidence suggesting a connection between psychiatric
drugs and suicide. Under a recent law, Swedish health-care providers must fill out reports on all suicides committed by patients under their care or
within four weeks of a health care visit. The reports are then sent to the NBHW, which compiles and analyzes them.
Recently, the NBHW released the first report analyzing the 367 suicides recorded in 2006. "Not a single word is written about the most compelling
fact: Well over 80 percent of persons killing themselves were treated with psychiatric drugs," Janne Larson writes.
According to data received via a Freedom of Information Act request, more than 80 percent of the 367 suicides had been receiving psychiatric
medications. More than half of these were receiving antidepressants, while more than 60 percent were receiving either antidepressants or
antipsychotics. There is no mention of this either in the NBHW paper or in major Swedish media reports about the health care suicides.
source
Ritalin also came under the spotlight last year, as it was revealed that the NHS in the UK was spending over £1 million PER MONTH on prescriptions
for this drug alone -
thread here
So is the article right and bipolar is being used as a catch-all diagnosis?
Is it being used as a way of keeping a percentage of the popiulation tranquilised?
Or is simply big pharma protecting its profits by foisting more and more drugs and "studies" onto doctors as a way to increase profits -
thread here
One thing is for sure - big pharma cares little or nothing for its "customers" it cares only about increasing profits and making a killing from the
latest "wonder drug" which as soon as it is introduced, see's an increase in the diagnosis of the illness it is supposed to help cure.
In the UK we see massive amounts of money being spent on drugs for mental illness without proper diagnosis, whilst life saving or life prolonging
drugs are denied to patients on the basis of cost.
Just to be clear on this, I am NOT saying that certain conditions don't exist - I know for a fact they do, having suffered from depression myself.
What I AM saying is that there is always a new wonder drug, which suddenly becomes the saviour of all mankinds ills, whether they be mental or
physical - it's pushed onto doctors by big pharma, and then it's pushed onto the patient, who most of the time has little or no idea of what they
are taking.
This could lead to massive health problems for the western world in the future, unless we educate people about it now, and put a curb on big pharma.