It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BlueTriangle
I still think this is going to be a surprisingly close election,
That is 20%, what about those that would not admit that race played a role. Lets just double that and that's 40%. Can you beleive that. Now mind you, not all states share those statistics but "Oh My GOD"
This morning’s New York Times reported that exit poll surveys in West Virginia showed two out of 10 white voters cited race as a factor in their decision
Originally posted by saturnine_sweet
reply to post by tombangelta
Sometimes more of that same is better than the change on the table. I don't want more of the same, but the change Obama represents is even worse. The rest of the world is welcome to socialism, but I don't want to see it here.
Originally posted by saturnine_sweet
reply to post by maybereal11
No, they give away Nobel prizes for supporting the interests of those who give the prizes. I mean, seriously, what did Gore do to win that? Make a movie full of bad science? Drum up billions of dollars for GW thieves? If your definition of brilliant is scamming billions of dollars, then I guess he's brilliant. And take a look at some of the other "winners." Gore's not the only one who is less than worthy.
Newsflash...Did I say in there anywhere that I was for the Republicans? No...I was giving an honest analysis. To an outsider, the last few Democratic candidates have been a joke. A scam artist who campaigns for GW even though he doesn't even apparently have a shred of understanding about the subject, judging from his movie. I'm not really sure what to call Kerry; as I said, all he ever did was try to look presidential and be "the other guy." And then Obama...whom I already stated the drawbacks of.
Another newsflash for you: It's not arrogance to tell the honest truth about something. I didn't see you try to refute anything I said; you just tried to mock and degrade me. It is not arrogant to call a fool a fool. I would say the past couple of elections have supported my statements well, and the upcoming one is likely to as well. I will never bow down to the idiocy of "being nice" to everyone, even the blithering idiots among us. I try to be polite, but if it's necessary to give the stark truth about the idiocy or inadequacies of someone or something, I will not hesitate to do so. It has nothing to do with partisan politics, and I could very well do the same for McCain, those his weaknesses lie in different areas. I was simply giving a reason, based on observations that correlate with available data, as to why Obama is slipping, despite the media's perception of the political atmosphere.
Originally posted by Becker44
reply to post by Multiple Junkie
Everything O.K. Multiple?
Do we need to throw you a life line or something?
Becker
The fact of the matter is that neither Obama nor his supporters thought they would be anywhere near this close at any point. This is an election season where the Democrats should be able to win nominating a stuffed animal for President, and yet Obama has never been able to pull away from McCain, and now in some instances...is trailing.
Can't feel good...