Police arrest man for photographing them, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
Topic started on 20-8-2008 @ 09:24 AM by Maxmars

Police arrest man for photographing them


www.metro.co.uk
When he photographed the police van outside a Bristol fish and chip shop, PC Aqil Farooq told him he was under arrest for assault, resisting arrest and being drunk and disorderly.
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 02:48 PM by Maxmars
reply to post by Terran Blue



Thanks for the link; what a shame. It's no different here in many areas. Police, and other 'officials' seem to think that they can intimidate anyone into believing whatever they want the law to be as it is convenient for them.

I fear someday they will get that authority.


reply posted on 22-8-2008 @ 08:13 PM by Terran Blue
reply to post by Spreadthetruth



A good vid Spread, showing yet another Clueless Copper enforcing their own version of the law.

I would like to highlight as well the info from the guy at the National Union of Journalists. Filming in a public place IS NOT ILLEGAL.

Know the law, or be abused by the law.


reply posted on 22-8-2008 @ 10:36 PM by Terran Blue
reply to post by toraylin



To be frank, I think alot of them rely on public ignorance of the law as well to be able to enforce 'laws' on them. Ignorance of the law allows the police to intimidate.

Note in that vid the rentacop tells the guy to shut up.... guarantee if the guy had told HIM to shut up all hell would have broken loose.


reply posted on 22-8-2008 @ 11:08 PM by jackinthebox
reply to post by Terran Blue



That's it, I'm moving to England! I've never seen a cop back off when they were proven wrong.

If that chap had done that here in the States he'd have gotten his knickers twisted for him. In other words, they would have tased him, beat him, possibly shot him, destroyed the camera, and charged him with at least one felony to go with a list of misdemeanors and violations.

Not an exaggeration. Especially when he told them "no, I won't turn the camera off." That would have been lights out right there.

EDIT to add: Word of caution to you Brits who come to the States, there are public places here in the "land of the free" where it is indeed illegal to film. It amazes me that we won our freedom from you only to end up worse off in the quest for liberty.

I saw a woman arrested last year for taking pictures of her boyfriend down by the river, because there was a bridge in the backround.


[edit on 8/22/0808 by jackinthebox]


reply posted on 24-8-2008 @ 03:50 AM by neformore
reply to post by Terran Blue



The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.



Except...they aren't policemen. They are PCSO's, and while they look and dress like police, they most certainly aren't. They don't have the same rights or powers as Police do.

I'm interested in the follow up to that though - does anyone know the history of it? I would assume there would have been some disciplinary action taken because the guy filming comes across as someone who would have chased it up.

Anyone know any more about it?



As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 7 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 18 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 6 days ago with 49 member flags

ATS Live North America is broadcasting in 40 minutes.
Today's Show: ATS Live: 96: Super powers, Falklands Woes, Stan Deyo Interview, Syria, Telepathy, The Devils Chord.