It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

9/11 Truth: Was Extra Equipment Attached To Flight 175?

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 20 2008 @ 12:41 AM
link   
One more thread of 9/11 lie comes unraveled...



Did they really think they could get away with it?




posted on Aug, 20 2008 @ 12:36 PM
link   
Simply put, no.

Michael Hezarkhani's, Evan Fairbanks', Spiegel TV's and all the other videos showing this extra piece are fake and that's not really UA175. In this world we live in, planes cannot and will not melt into buildings as we see in the videos. No matter how fast they are flying...period! All objects on this earth have laws of physics and motion that must be obeyed. The "plane" in these videos violates many laws.

In Michael Hezarkhani's video, we can see the South Tower "heal" itself after the left wing enters the building. We can see the "plane" change shapes in mid-air, between the fuselage and wings, which is the piece referred to in the video you posted. Further, there's a 37-story building missing known as 19 Rector St.

In Evan Fairbanks' video, as in Michael Hezarkhani's video, the "plane" has white wings. Even one of the witnesses mentioned in the above video said the plane was gray. In all other videos, including the "live" footage, all the "planes" have black wings. The "flash" is also featured white in his video. In other videos, the flash is orange. Mr. Fairbanks has admitted the video we see was cut by the FBI, and only they have the original. Not even he has see the original.

In all the videos that show the extra piece, the "plane's" wings cut through the steel exterior of the building, enabling the entire "plane" to melt into the building with no respect for the law of motion. Even the tail of the plane is allowed to cut through steel, without a single piece of debris falling to the ground.

And...

Why, oh why is there not a hole until after the explosion when we just saw a "plane" fly through it?

That is NOT UA175, nor is it a real airplane. They are computer graphic images made to trick us all.



posted on Aug, 21 2008 @ 10:25 PM
link   
CGI huh? So explain why dozens of still cameras and dozens of privately owned video cameras captured the same thing as the ones you think are CG????



posted on Aug, 21 2008 @ 10:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
CGI huh? So explain why dozens of still cameras and dozens of privately owned video cameras captured the same thing as the ones you think are CG????


The same thing? They captured different color planes-some black, some white.

Michael Hezarkhani's and Evan Fairbank's video showed us a blue and white "plane", while Spiegel TV, Jennifer Spell, Scott Myers, CNN's Park Foreman and a few others showed us a black "plane".

Black is not white.

Michael Hezarkhani's, Evan Fairbank's and Spiegel TV's videos can been seen in the video posted in the OP, which will show you how different they are. If you would like me to post links of the others I mentioned (and more), I will more than happy to do so.



posted on Aug, 22 2008 @ 07:10 AM
link   
Lemme rephrase swampfox

CGI huh?
So why did they chose to use 25.7 different models for the same object and morph the forms and change colors, something wich *DOES NOT* happen in a CGI unless you push a button?



posted on Aug, 23 2008 @ 04:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by debunky
CGI huh?
So why did they chose to use 25.7 different models for the same object and morph the forms and change colors, something wich *DOES NOT* happen in a CGI unless you push a button?


I really don't understand what you mean by "25.7 different models".

Not all the videos used the same CGI plane or even CGI at all(like the "live" shots, which were composites). Some videos are real images of planes inserted into the video. For example; Michael Hezarkhani's and Evan Fairbanks' videos are CGI(most likely the same CGI plane). While Scott Myers, Luis Alonso, Jennifer Spell, CNN's Park Foreman and many more are real images inserted into the video.

CNN's Park Foreman's video starts out as Army footage of a JASSM missile, then is switched to a plane image before the "plane" hits the South Tower. The switch is very obvious, and how people still believe it's legit is amazing.

www.youtube.com...

Jennifer Spell's video shows us what really hit the South Tower, and it wasn't just the fake plane.

www.youtube.com...

[edit on 23-8-2008 by Niobis]



new topics

top topics
 
0

log in

join