It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mopusvindictus
reply to post by asmeone2
You know this is intrusive
I have to say I see a huge problem has developed in America due to nutrition, it does make a person lazy and mentally deficient to eat all sugars and processed foods and trans fat
I can't say I see anything much wrong with limiting ...maybe 80% to be fair to genuinely healthy food groups.
We were subsequently conditioned to switch between these
reflexes depending on whether the person we were dealing with
was Higher in the pecking order or Lower in the pecking order.
(Middle-class people, e.g., Reagan conservatives, John Birchers,
etc. will always revere those Higher in the pecking order; and,
equally, will always have some reason to persecute—peck at—
the poor, who are Lower in the pecking order. Hence, they will
say and even believe, that they are being robbed by the poor on
Welfare—who get about 4% of the tax dollar—and never
"notice" that the military-industrial complex is getting 72% of
their tax dollar. This is normal mammalian sociobiology.)
Originally posted by Amaterasu
I see the smiley and don't know if you're kidding or not... In case you are not... A bagel is BREAD.
So you tell me why ANYONE should be drug tested.
Heh. Again, I don't know if you're serious
Originally posted by styxxz
Drugs are bad mm'kay
One certain drug was cut from study by Reagan because all they could find was benefits, and THAT just wasn't what the government, who is using the War on (some people who use some) Drugs to bring the police state into our lives. (This drug in question can be homegrown and is considered a weed.)