Bill would allow lethal drinks by prescription, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 11:01 AM by deadline527
Originally posted by Sliick
Suicide-The intentional taking of one's own life.

seems like suicide to me. yes i know it's hard to watch someone suffer while the doc shrugs his shoulders. it's still suicide. imho doctors who will prescribe this Secobarbital are acting like Dr. Kevorkian. Though that punk did it for different reasons. I can see how it would be justified in this situation, yet it's still suicide.


That is true, and I totally agree. But, without all these hospital machines, most of these people shouldn't even be alive anyway. We are the ones forcing them to live, when its obvious that they should be dead. Why force someone to live in horrible pain, when they are going to die the second you unhook them from whatever they are required to lug around with them? Why not let them say their goodbyes to their family and go in peace, instead of a sudden, unexpected death that causes much more grievance to the family and friends.

As for Dr. Kavorkian, I would rather have a doctor assisted euthanasia then someone blowing their brains out with a shotgun. If someone wants to die, they are going to die, its just a matter of how. And what different reason did Dr. Kavorkian have? I thought he only dealt with terminally ill patients who were mentally stable and wanted to end their own life. He did NOT euthanize them, he only provided the means. They still had a choice on weather or not they wanted to go through with it.

[edit on 20-8-2008 by deadline527]



reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 01:52 PM by nunya13
Originally posted by deadline527
Hmm.. so death takes up to an hour?

What if you change your mind after drinking it? lol

I wonder if they have another chemical that is able to reverse the effects of this drug, or if its a guaranteed death once it passes your lips.


If you are terminally ill and in extreme pain, chances are, your not going to change your mind. You're going to wish it would hurry up.

I didn't see her actual death, but when i visited my grandma in her home on her death bed hours before she died I would've wished for her death to come at that very moment. She has melanoma cancer that was untreatable except that chemo would've given her only weeks. She decided to forgo any treatment at all except for pain meds and live out her last days in her home as opposed to a hospital bed.

She had a tumor behind her eye and it was pushing it outward. She couldn't eat a dang thing. She lost several pounds within a couple days. She was barely coherent and in incredible pain.

Why is it that people are so willing to put their pets out of their misery but will sit there and watch a loved one die.

A friend of mine's wife died a couple months ago due to kidney failure. Instead of being on dialysis 24 hours a day, which is the only thing that would've kept her alive, she decided to go home and die. Now, imagine that. There's IS NO POSSIBLE WAY she would've survived, yet, she had to lay there for about a day (give or take, can't exactly remember) just waiting for that last moment of life. Imagine the pain it also caused her family to watch her go through this. The trauma of expecting every single moment to be her last. If she had this drink, then it would've ended needless suffering for all parties and I would expect that she would've gone a lot more peacefully.

If my grandma had asked me to end her prolonged suffering, I would've done it for her, no questions asked. It was absolutely and entirely inevitable. it would've been the last loving act I could've done for her.

As for "First do no harm". I strongly believe that sitting there watching someone die in pain and agony is definitely doing a heck of a lot more harm than good.

Edit: What I should say is that if there were a lethal drug or drink like the one being discussed that was available, I would've done that for my grandma. I don't think I would be able to shoot her or something like that. That's not necessarily guaranteed and, well, very traumatizing, quite honestly.

[edit on 20-8-2008 by nunya13]


reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 03:59 PM by deadline527
reply to post by nunya13



I can also add in here that my uncle was sent home to die in the comfort of his own home. With my family all visiting him through out the days, we all knew he wouldent last long. The sound of fluid in his lungs while he talked was probably one of the worst things you could experience. I only wish there was something like this medication at that point in time. For him to be able to say his good byes to everyone at once, and die peacefully would have been a lot less traumatic then not knowing, as well as for the people who thought he might make it another day... and never were able to see him. My cousin had to watch his father basically writhe in pain, just waiting for him to die to end his suffering. This is NOT living. This is downright TORTURE.


reply posted on 21-8-2008 @ 05:57 AM by Bob Sholtz
Originally posted by wolfmanjack
Its a pretty damn simple situation..

What other people do to themselves is none of anyone else's Business.

A really good book on this issue is here. (You can read it online)
www.mcwilliams.com...
Ain't Nobody's Business If You Do

It talks about CONSENSUAL CRIMES and how the far left/right, bible thumpers etc impose their values etc onto the rest of us.

Quite frankly i think it comes down to this.. If it isn't your body shut the hell up and let people decide for themselves what they are going to do. It isn't your right to dictate to others what they can and can do with their own body.

Edit..

Raist ..... LMAO mate.. There are plenty of things out in the world a person can kill themselves with.. Without having to resort to some drink. The advantage of having this drink is to make sure you have something that will do the job and not leave you as a vegetable or worse.

And the entire premise of unethical (first do no harm) is a joke. When in a lot of these cases not doing anything at all is doing more harm then doing something.






[edit on 19-8-2008 by wolfmanjack]


So if i killed you with my body, it isn't your business? I mean, it is my choice, and since its my choice, i shouldn't be punished for it.


reply posted on 21-8-2008 @ 04:42 PM by Enigma Publius
Originally posted by Lophorus
I have a friend and she has Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Anyone who says that you should not be aloud to take this drink for any reason should hang out with her for a day and see the fear in her eyes as the pain of razor shap bones cut threw he muscles and stillness creeps up her body.

One day she wont be able to move or communicate with anyone just feel the pain of her muscles being replaced by bone. She will be a living statue of pain.

If she asked me to help her out I would have no problem doing what I could for her.



img81.imageshack.us...

All i know for sure is that some form of assisted suicide should be legal, it just worries me putting it in the hands of SO MANY doctors....maybe a special degree or more specific schooling should be necessary. I would add a new class of drugs to the schedule, putting a new category of Type 0 drugs that always result in death, and requiring more training to prescribe them. what do u think?
with that being said, i still think the bill will pass. But i know a few doctors who will never prescribe that, and others who shouldn't be allowed to. i feel for your friend and i don't see how anyone could argue that she would be someone for whom this law mass designed for, what worries me is what i said above along with what others said about corrupt family members. as for the guy saying terrorists would be all over this....c'mon, this kinda thing has probably been available in other countries for awhile, the USA is usually last to get new meds because the FDA can REALLY stall when they want to. They could just as easily carry around cianide capsuls or something, or som Jim Jones Juice or something. i don't see why no one else can agree that
1.of course people like this persons friend should have options that are pain free and 100% to work
2.A lot of doctors would still be scared to prescribe it.
3.a lot of doctors are not responsible enough to prescribe it
4.the possibility of more and more people being diagnosed "terminal" when they are not DEFINATELY terminal because they are encouraged to do so by health insurance companies who would save a lot of money if the patient died sooner
5.this issue is not as simple as "it's wrong u will go to hell" OR "it's my body i can do what i want"////the thread is MUCH deeper because we have to discuss wrether or not any family doctor could do this. What do ya'll think about making it a whole new branch of medecine?
6.what about insurance policies that don't pay out to the family if the person commits suicide?
there is a lot of things to discuss, and i don't know JACK about insurance companies, OR euthanasia, OR malpractrice, so i wish someone more educated than me would expand on my comments. PLEASE



reply posted on 21-8-2008 @ 08:03 PM by Lophorus
This site has a year by year brake down of legal secobabital suicide.
This is just the first year.
www.religioustolerance.org...


By the end of 1998, one prediction of the anti-choice forces had not materialized. There was no rush of people to Oregon to seek an easy end to their life. Since the law was passed, only about one Oregonian per month has elected to commit physician assisted suicide.

Dr. Arthur Chin of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention was the lead researcher in a study of the physician assisted suicide law in Oregon. The study found that during the calendar year 1998: 1
bullet Many people expected that large numbers of the terminally ill would take advantage of the law. In fact, very few did - only 23 during 1998.
bullet Of the 23 individuals, 15 committed suicide, usually within a day of receiving the prescription. 6 died from their illnesses without using the medication. 2 remained alive at the end of 1998.
bullet Some had predicted that most of those seeking help in dying would be poor, uneducated, uninsured, or concerned about the financial effects of a long, lingering death or fearful of intractable pain. These predictions did not come true. Gender, education, health insurance status, and fear of pain did not play an influential role in prompting a person to seek help in dying.
bullet The CDC compared these 15 with 43 others with similar fatal diseases but who elected to not seek help. They found a number of determining factors that led people to seek help in dying:
bullet "Concern about loss of autonomy or control of bodily functions."
bullet Having never married.
bullet Being a divorced person.
bullet Having led an independent life.
bullet 13 of the 15 were dying of cancer.
bullet Six of the fifteen had to change doctors at least once to find one willing to write a prescription.
bullet Of the 15 who committed suicide, all were white; 8 were male; their median age was 68 years.
bullet Doctors usually prescribed a fatal dose of Secobarbital, along with an anti-vomiting medicine so that the barbiturate would be properly adsorbed by the body.
bullet Everyone who committed suicide became unconscious within 5 minutes. Most were dead within an hour.
www.religioustolerance.org...


reply posted on 22-8-2008 @ 03:36 PM by nunya13
reply to post by deadline527



It most certainly is torture. I guess i never thought of it that way.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 16 hours ago, 24 flags
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 14 hours ago, 22 flags
ATS's Gutter-rats and the 90+ intro thread
  Rant, Posted 14 hours ago, 20 flags
My Brain = about to explode
  Member Art, Posted 6 hours ago, 17 flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 16 hours ago, 124 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 14 hours ago, 96 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 11 hours ago, 64 replies