It's clear that you have had your share of confrontations in this area.
I suspect that your paradigm for 'God' does not agree with theirs.
If God meets the criterion of being beyond our capability to comprehend, then we can't really expect human morals to be of relevance to God. If we
accept that God has a 'personality' and is, in some way, 'made in our image' (that's a pun or something), then you're rigt to expect some
meaningful understanding of why 'He/She/It/They/We' allow it to be so.
The real question is centered around something you seem to want to accept 'axiomatically', namely; God is a 'person' with a personality and
likeness to us. Is this correct?



