It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Uncensored NASA Moon Images!!

page: 37
233
<< 34  35  36    38  39  40 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 25 2008 @ 11:37 AM
link   
reply to post by SPreston
 


Give me some more minutes, I will post two images showing where those can be found.




posted on Aug, 25 2008 @ 12:12 PM
link   
reply to post by liamoohay
 

The images with the tracks are from image lo3-72-h2c, the areas are in blue and red in the following image.



I think all other photos are from the same image, lo5-125-h2a, but I could not find all of them, I think I missed four images.

All the coloured rectangles show the nine images posted by Mikesingh on the opening post that could find.



posted on Aug, 25 2008 @ 12:42 PM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


According to this map it's Lobachevsky.


Here is a crop from the higer resolution image I found some posts ago.


And this is after level adjustment without data loss.



posted on Aug, 25 2008 @ 12:54 PM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


i guess the question would be as to why the secrecy since surely the notion of man living on moon
would boost man living on earths moral as to what our capabilities are,
id say the vail of secrecy is wrong but its just an opinion.


could it be said that its been done in stages (un manned) missions with these robots/droids ,
first in the 1800´s with rockerfeller / rotchilde / vatican fundings then the nazis/cccp with tesla technology
and now its more of a divide and concour situvation over there over with whats left from collapsed nations previus missions that stopped due to lack of fundings ?


i seppose your refering to the project camelot ?

ive watched most of the projetc camelot videos and read most whats offred there and its intresting statements.

but im still some what in the dark as to what Donna Hare and co did over there for nasa ,
where they the one´s transfering the photos to the mockups that where later photografed and sold as public display items or where they just working with mockups and they are wittneses to foul play that has lead many to belive that there might be more to the original pictures then we are told ?



[edit on 25-8-2008 by zerbot565]



posted on Aug, 25 2008 @ 02:12 PM
link   
It has been said that the original Lunar Orbiter tapes have been lost. This is not the case. An entire set has been in storage at JPL since about 1987. The real problem was to find a tape reader that could read the 2" wide x 14" diameter tapes as they were in a format no longer used today.

In 1992 the only tape drives remaining were assembled in Pasadena California in an attempt to read the tapes. The attempt was successful in that a scan line was decoded and shown on an oscilloscope. The project languished due to lack of funding until last year. A reasonably funded project is now under way to recover 5 of the 2000 or so 28" x 30" pictures and then digitize them. This will result in the finest pictures ever taken of the Moon to date.

As for anomalies on the Moon, there are some, but until one knows how a picture was taken, how it was processed and how you are looking at it, you can be easily fooled. Just like the people were at JPL when they created the Martian picture with the blue sky - in error.

Here are some interesting sites concerning anomalies on the Moon for you that you might not be aware of:
www.thelivingmoon.com...
www.k3pgp.org...



posted on Aug, 25 2008 @ 02:53 PM
link   
reply to post by Dr. X
 


I love seeing thelivingmoon.com linked so heavily around these parts.
Since it isn't MY site, I can "pimp" it a little, right?

You are correct, there is LOTS of good stuff on that website. If you get a chance, tell Zorgon thank you for putting so much time into that for us to use.

If you click the link in my signature (as well as Mike Singh's) it will take you to thelivingmoon.com. We are fairly familiar with it.


[edit on 25-8-2008 by bigfatfurrytexan]



posted on Aug, 25 2008 @ 03:09 PM
link   
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
 


Sorry about that. I tried a post sometime earlier (about page 25 or so) as Anonymous but it never showed up so I forgot about it until now. So I looked into signing in to post and LO! (as Charles Fort would say), there it was. However, as this thread is rather long, I had forgotten some details of what sites were referred to. So I jumped to your site via the link you provided. I haven't had time to look it over yet, but it looks very interesting. Thanks for the heads up.




posted on Aug, 25 2008 @ 08:06 PM
link   
reply to post by mikesingh
 


I agree that the photo with the hieroglyphs in the landscape is amazing, and the one with the snake-like dam puzzling (what force caused it and why is it so white??) - unless the photo's are tampered with. And people, it's possible to tamper with photographic material. Please don't go into denial about that! Basically no photograph can be trusted. So remarks of doubt are not necessarily 'stupid', as I read somewhere. That's NOT fair.

Now please explain this one to me:
On august 25 04:49 (page 35) Mikesingh posted a photograph of a skidded crater -meteor came in at a diagonal angle - and at the right sight we see two dark smears or puddles, like some goo leaked down the crater hill. Close to the crater we also see a spire.

On august 25 12:42 (page 37) ArMaP enhanced the photo. We see the same crater, the same black puddles, we see no spire.
Where did it go?



posted on Aug, 25 2008 @ 09:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by RFBurns
 


That is a higly altered photo of something (I know what it is but I will not spoil the fun
), and it is a good example of how some filters are better at hiding what things may be than to show it.


Exactly!


My point was to show that even tho the cameras used on the early probes were antiquated by today's standards, very simple techniques could be used to "hide" something when they needed to.

This is not saying that there is an absolute when it comes to something actually being in these recent images we are looking at from the Moon. It is saying that everyone should keep an open mind to all ideas and consider everything very carefully and not jump to conclusion so quickly.

Sorry for the delay in putting up the answer, but work does keep me away from the pc sometimes!


The image:




is of an ancient aztec ruin near the 4 corners area. Using simple "blurr" and removing all chroma information to produce a 256 grescale image, we have what is above. The original:




You see its important to remember that what we see up front may not exactly be what we are inerpreting up front. We must look at all the angles and take into consideration that not everything can be readily explained by just one point of view. Its good to have more than one angle of analysis because that keeps the quest for knowledge moving forward and closer to the truth.


Cheers!!!



posted on Aug, 25 2008 @ 10:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by ArMaP
And this is after level adjustment without data loss.

That photo looks like the dark object crashed into the moon surface on an oblique angle, created the crater, and then continued on through the wall of its own crater.



posted on Aug, 25 2008 @ 10:28 PM
link   
reply to post by SPreston
 


yep. there is no way that is a lava flow.

something black, or some dark color (iron or something?).



posted on Aug, 25 2008 @ 10:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by liamoohay
reply to post by mikesingh
 


Could you please post the image #'s from your OP I can not seem to find them in the link you gave. Thanks


The links have already been posted all through the thread by other ATSers too. But here are some:

ser.sese.asu.edu...
ser.sese.asu.edu...
ser.sese.asu.edu...

You'll need to zoom in max and more by clicking the right mouse button, and search the area. There are more but let me know which one you are particularly interested in.

Cheers!



posted on Aug, 26 2008 @ 12:47 AM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


Call me crazy but did any one notice this in zorgons post?

From Zorgons post:


The face I see:




-Euclid

[edit on 26-8-2008 by euclid]

[edit on 26-8-2008 by euclid]



posted on Aug, 26 2008 @ 12:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by liamoohay
 

The images with the tracks are from image lo3-72-h2c, the areas are in blue and red in the following image.



I think all other photos are from the same image, lo5-125-h2a, but I could not find all of them, I think I missed four images.

All the coloured rectangles show the nine images posted by Mikesingh on the opening post that could find.


ArMaP! Thanks a million!
You sure have done your homework!! A star! But can't flag!


Cheers!



posted on Aug, 26 2008 @ 01:01 AM
link   
reply to post by Anonymous ATS
 


AIRBRUSHED!!!



posted on Aug, 26 2008 @ 01:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by Orion437
Tricks of light and shadow...(?)






I see all kinds of crazy stuff in there
.... but I am known to have an overactive imagination:



Am I crazy?

-Euclid



posted on Aug, 26 2008 @ 02:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by zerbot565
id say the vail of secrecy is wrong but its just an opinion.


Well I would say that most of us in here agree with that statement... hence our effort to uncover what we can As Neil Armstrong best put it...

"To you we say we have only completed a beginning. We leave you much that is undone. There are great ideas undiscovered, breakthroughs available to those who can remove one of the truths protective layers. There are places to go beyond belief..."

Neil Armstrong... White House Speech July 20, 1994



I suppose your referring to the project Camelot ?


No I am not... but they have some good info... I refer to an Army project


All in good time... when I have time
and Ze papers



posted on Aug, 26 2008 @ 02:16 AM
link   
reply to post by RFBurns
 


Have you seen my post a few pages back of what Washington DC looks like in the satellite image? Nowhere near the Moon images posted here, which are far clearer!!

Cheers!



posted on Aug, 26 2008 @ 02:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by euclid
I see all kinds of crazy stuff in there
.... but I am known to have an overactive imagination:

Am I crazy?

-Euclid


Darn! I can't find Orion's post with those strange formations you've annotated. Can you tell me where the heck it is?

Thanks!



posted on Aug, 26 2008 @ 02:30 AM
link   
Lucky '7'!


lo3-168-h2b




top topics



 
233
<< 34  35  36    38  39  40 >>

log in

join