Hitler, Ayrans, Summerians. How it all ties in., page 9
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 70 times


reply posted on 23-8-2008 @ 11:19 PM by Matrix1111
Originally posted by Turiddu
No evidence to prove the "Hitler-Crowley" myth or the "Hitler/Nazis = Occulist(s) " link?

Not very surprising My original post in this thread stands.

[edit on 23-8-2008 by Turiddu]


You'll only accept evidence from "acceptable" sources, so what's the use trying to convince you? But since you insist...

Crowley's student Dietrich Eckart would become an important mentor for Hitler during this time. Eckart was the wealthy publisher and editor-in-chief of the anti-Semitic journal Auf Gut Deutsch. He was also a committed occultist and a master of magic who belonged to the inner circle of the Thule Society as well as other esoteric orders. Eckart used his master's ritual magic to prepare Hitler for his occultic destiny of ruling the Aryan race and ultimately the world.

Having done his worst, Eckart died in 1923, but only after proudly advising those around him: "Follow Hitler! He will dance, but it is I who have called the tune! I have initiated him into the 'Secret Doctrine', opened his centers of vision and given him the means to communicate with the Powers. Do not mourn for me: I shall have influenced history more than any other German."

From then on Crowley himself influenced Hitler's thinking and beliefs directly. Hitler was already familiar with his writing and theories through the Thule Society, and The Book of the Law, oriented toward various fascist principles, became Hitler's guide. Very often he would paraphrase or express an idea from the book - often word for word.

Armed with new, secret psychological techniques Hitler was able to move the obscure National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP) from the clubs and beer halls to a mass movement, while in 1925 Crowley was elected World Head of the OTO.

Between 1936 and 1939 Crowley paid a number of visits to Nazi Germany while Heinrich Himmler's Occult Corps (Geheimnisvolle Korps) recruited or persecuted all practicing occultists in Germany and incorporated into one organization the Thule Society, the Vril Society and the German branch of the OTO. The SS Paranormal Division's subsequent vilification of Crowley during World War II was a simple cover; behind the political facades performed for the public the most powerful factions (occult and economic) of Germany and Britain were not enemies but allies, bound together in the one great war for the conquest of men’s souls and minds.

Himmler viewed the relationship between Crowley and Hitler like that once shared by Merlin and Arthur: the one magician, adviser and the architect of Camelot, the other true-born king, and each equally benefitting from the favors of the other. But Marianna Blavatsky, high priestess of the Occult Corps, claimed the relationship was more like that once shared by Rasputin and the Romanovs of Russia, and that it was Crowley who ruled the Third Reich


A quote without a source. Is that any better?



reply posted on 24-8-2008 @ 12:08 AM by Barbs46
reply to post by ExoByte



This is going to take me awhile to get through, but I wanted to thank the poster for his extensive work. It's just a great demonstration of connecting the dots of our history, today's events and an uncertain future for the Earth and mankind.
I have gotten snatches over the years regarding some of this and my quest continues. The Hitler piece is critical and all the more as information emerges about "Zionist Jews" and other confusing recent history accounts.
It is like Up is Down, Left is Right, White is Black. It is a matrix.
More and more, I am realizing that these times are critical in getting educated in preparation for really who knows. But it's going to be big and many will be ill-prepared and literally frightened to death.


reply posted on 24-8-2008 @ 09:38 AM by Turiddu
reply to post by nightmare_david



The burden of proof is on those making these claims, they must provide the evidence. I am sorry if you are "annoyed" because this ridiculous theory is turning out to be nothing more than fantasy with no legitimate evidence to back it up.

[edit on 24-8-2008 by Turiddu]


reply posted on 25-8-2008 @ 09:51 AM by tyranny22
reply to post by Turiddu



Certainly, we'll see no video of the two together. More than likely, we'll find no correspondence between the two and I doubt there's any documentation that was passed from Crowley to Eckart to Hitler that can be referenced. So, there will never be enough proof to present beyond a reasonable doubt. But, Crowley's link to Dietrich Eckart, Hitler mentor, is enough circumstantial evidence for me to believe that there could have possibly been a distant, if not direct influence on Hitler.



reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 01:46 AM by nightmare_david
Originally posted by Turiddu
reply to
post by nightmare_david



The burden of proof is on those making these claims, they must provide the evidence. I am sorry if you are "annoyed" because this ridiculous theory is turning out to be nothing more than fantasy with no legitimate evidence to back it up.

[edit on 24-8-2008 by Turiddu]


You did the same exact thing by making it a point to keep saying they never met with nothing to prove that at all, but kept implying it was a fact simply because it's what you believe.

I also like how you completely ignored Matrix1111's post above and decided to attack me instead. You had nothing to prove Matrix1111 wrong with so ignored it completely to attack me because I said what you were doing was annoying and it was. I'm waiting to see if this thread hits a page 10 to see if you come back to bring it up again.


reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 10:17 AM by Turiddu
reply to post by nightmare_david



His evidence is proof of nothing, a "A quote without a source" in his own words. The fact of the matter is that even after 9+ pages, nobody supporting this theory has yet to offer any compelling evidence to back it up.

[edit on 27-8-2008 by Turiddu]


reply posted on 27-8-2008 @ 11:52 AM by Matrix1111
Originally posted by Turiddu
reply to
post by nightmare_david



His evidence is proof of nothing, a "A quote without a source" in his own words. The fact of the matter is that even after 9+ pages, nobody supporting this theory has yet to offer any compelling evidence to back it up.

[edit on 27-8-2008 by Turiddu]


I didn't bother giving you a source. What good would it be?

Is this about Hitler being influenced by occult secret societies or has it just been diverted to the "did Crowley and Hitler ever meet" debate?


reply posted on 31-8-2008 @ 09:13 AM by Rionifics
I know too little about either the Sumerians or Hitler/Nazis to have an informed opinion, but I did find the postings very interesting and earnest in the telling. I'd say I fell somewhere between the categories of one who finds the story exciting and a somewhat epiphanal, and the reader who remains curious to know more beyond the conclusion of the post.

I had a thought about "The Watchers". I just read The Threat, by Dr. David Jacobs, in which he presents his findings on years worth of study of evidence obtained from carefully conducted hypnotism on alleged UFO abductees. His writing depicts abductions are usually carried out by Grays, who are observed--through retrieved suppressed memories--staring into the eyes of the abductee at close range, effecting the abductee with paralysis or loss of autonomy over their physiological/psychological functions. I wonder if this often reported aspect of modern-day UFO abduction impacts the context in which Grays were called Watchers.

I imagine Grays in the time of the Sumerians would be noted as observers of human civilization, making the term Watchers an accurate description of them; however, I wonder if there was an additional meaning to this term--maybe lost in translation from an ancient language--a layer of definition that included the more tangible, literal behavior of grays possibly performing staring procedures to exert control on abducted humans back in ancient times. What the author of the posting described of the Sumerian account of (I'm paraphrasing here the sons of gods intermingling with the daughter of men, and the children of Annunaki creating a man modified with their spittle and clay, and placing this being in a female (human), seem to me strikingly similar to Dr. Jacob’s description of the prevalent breeding and hybridization aspect--and core mission behind--the contemporary UFO abduction phenomenon.

Thanks to ExoByte for taking the time to share this very interesting and compelling account. I am persuaded that it is a topic worth much more study.

- Rionifics
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^