Originally posted by Riposte
What do you mean, "not hard to see the skepticism here?" Do you think I'm trying to hide it or something? Because I'm not.
It wasn't a question, but I was emphasizing your skeptical approach. Thank you for confirming it.
The "money angle" is perfectly relevant here, because if Gilliland is making several hundred thousand dollars a year from this, it doesn't seem to
mesh nicely with the philosophy he espouses on his website and videos. That kind of a contradiction in lifestyle is a major warning sign.
It is even moreso a major warning sign for people who are already eager to debunk a case like that of James Gilliland. If you suspect Gilliland is
making "hundred thousands of dollars" then make a case for it. Right now you're speculating and setting the scene. You're using his spiritual
oriented message against him but you haven't proven anything in the slightest.
And as you can see from my previous post, I think there is absolutely nothing at all wrong with charging small fees to maintain his ranch and for food
and medical expenses.
Alrighty then.
His whole purpose seems to be about being a good Samaritan, so yes, he is going to have to walk the walk, especially if he what he says is true.
Otherwise the aliens are going to shut him out, and that is all according to HIS OWN WORDS.
You're going to walk what you talk as well. Atmospheric/plasma anomolies for one but that's off topic, right? As far as Gilliland's "own words",
you're setting them up to be used against him. Again you're creating an atmosphere against Gilliland to serve your own belief system (and maybe
agenda).
Why don't you just answer the question? I am asking what he charges (which means I don't know what his income looks like). So if you want me to drop
it, give me some concrete answer instead of trying to evade the topic altogether.
I don't have an answer to your question. I've never been to Mt. Adams. I don't know what Gilliland charges. From what I can gather on the internet
and reports by people who went there, there doesn't seem to be a disproportionate amount of money charging on the part of James Gilliland. That
brings me back again to my original statement; "Why don't you just drop this argument? If you see James Gilliland charging way out of proportion
then you can make an argument. Don't attempt to create an atmosphere where James Gilliland is already suspect as being a propheteer."
Got it?