Originally posted by jfj123
He never said there were no body parts. Everyone there said they saw body parts strewn through the crash site.
Here are some corrections
1. debris was not found 8 miles away from the flight 93 crash site. There was only a few papers found as far as Indian Lake which is approx. 1.5
miles away.
2. Wally Millers response to your above accusation is as follows:
"What I meant is that after 20 minutes I stopped being a coroner and started being a funeral director. The coroners job is to determine the cause and
manor of death. Well we knew what the cause of death was
Another witness:
Lt. Patrick Madigan PA State Police
"There were many parts of human remains that were located and recovered"
So yes there were body parts and no, there were not debris found 8 miles from the crash sight.
the debris field(s) is still pretty up for debate around here, much like the 'official' story. and if you pay attention, i addressed wally's last
statement and his recanting of it in that manner. did not feel the need to post the quote since
1-i said he recanted the statement
2-did you read all the other quotes he was not able to so easily explain away?
larry clarified "pull it"
wally clarified "stopped being coroner"
amazing how these people can come back and clear it all up so it makes sense to you. too bad they cannot say it right the first time. or in wally's
case, the first several times.
you also fail to explain then, what did he mean he stopped being coroner because the cause was clear? after 20 minutes he knew more than anyone else?
why did he not run and tell the white house that he knew after 20 minutes of being at the crash site exactly what the crime was. be serious.
he knew from 20 minutes at the crash site that hijackers took over the plane and crashed it and that is why everyone is dead. interesing, so when he
was called, they said
"wally, we got a plane crash, get down here and be coroner."
"ok im on my way."
20+ minutes later
"seems it was the plane crash that killed 'em. where is my paycheck?"
seems he could have figured that all out from hearing that he was ON HIS WAY TO A PLANE CRASH. but that is just me.
i like how you debunkers take a post full of evidence against you and then take the time to attack one single little point in it and sit back feeling
victorious. if you are going to address the quote, i already clarified, then what about the many other statements he made about no bodies, no blood,
no victims, no pilots, no passenger, NO BODIES ANYWHERE. did you even read all of the quotes. let me try give them to you again.
Wallace Miller is the coroner of Somerset County, Pennsylvania. He was among the first people to arrive at the alleged Flight 93 crash site on the
morning of 9/11.
He later recounted to the Washington Post what he'd seen when he first got there: "I stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes, because there
were no bodies there. It became like a giant funeral service." (Peter Perl, "Hallowed Ground," Washington Post, 5/12/2002)
Since there were 44 people on board Flight 93, a crash site with "no bodies" makes no sense. Where were the victims? Something appears to have been
seriously wrong.
Yet Miller now seems to dispute his earlier claim. In the recent BBC documentary 9/11: The Conspiracy Files, he explained: "I said that I stopped
being a coroner after about 20 minutes because it was perfectly clear what the cause and manner of death was gonna be. It was a plane crash but yet it
was a homicide because the terrorists hijacked the plane and killed the people, and the terrorists committed suicide. So from that point, yes it was a
misquote, because the point that I was trying to make was, after that it more or less became a large funeral service." The BBC documentary's
producer Guy Smith endorsed this claim, telling Loose Change creator Dylan Avery that Miller meant his earlier statement only as "a simile. ... It
looked as if that had happened. ... But he didn't mean that literally." (9/11: The Conspiracy Files, BBC 2, 2/18/2007)
Was the Washington Post mistaken? Did they "misquote" Wallace Miller? Other reports suggest differently. In the 12 months following 9/11, Miller in
fact described the surprising lack of human remains at the Flight 93 crash site, repeatedly and unequivocally:
He told author David McCall: "I got to the actual crash site and could not believe what I saw. ... Usually you see much debris, wreckage, and much
noise and commotion. This crash was different. There was no wreckage, no bodies, and no noise. ... It appeared as though there were no passengers or
crew on this plane." (David McCall, From Tragedy to Triumph, 2002, pp. 86-87)
He told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: "It was as if the plane had stopped and let the passengers off before it crashed." (Tom Gibb, "Newsmaker:
Coroner's quiet unflappability helps him take charge of Somerset tragedy," Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 10/15/2001)
He told CNN: "It was a really a very unusual site. You almost would've thought the passengers had been dropped off somewhere. ... Even by the
standard model of an airplane crash, there was very little, even by those standards." (CNN, 3/11/2002)
Author Jere Longman wrote: "Wallace Miller, the Somerset County coroner, arrived and walked around the [crash] site with [assistant volunteer fire
chief Rick] King. ... They walked around for an hour and found almost no human remains. 'If you didn't know, you would have thought no one was on
the plane,' Miller said. 'You would have thought they dropped them off somewhere.'" (Jere Longman, Among the Heroes, 2002, p. 217)
Recalling the crash scene, Miller told the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review: "This is the most eerie thing. I have not, to this day, seen a single drop of
blood. Not a drop." (Robb Frederick, "The day that changed America," Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, 9/11/2002)
Australian newspaper The Age reported: "Miller was familiar with scenes of sudden and violent death, although none quite like this. Walking in his
gumboots, the only recognisable body part he saw was a piece of spinal cord, with five vertebrae attached. 'I've seen a lot of highway fatalities
where there's fragmentation,' Miller said. 'The interesting thing about this particular case is that I haven't, to this day, 11 months later, seen
any single drop of blood. Not a drop. The only thing I can deduce is that the crash was over in half a second. There was a fireball 15-20 metres high,
so all of that material just got vaporised.'" ("On Hallowed Ground," The Age, 9/9/2002)
It would be ridiculous to claim that these accounts were all 'misquotes.' Furthermore, several other witnesses also made the same observation, and
later said they saw virtually no human remains at the Flight 93 crash site:
According to the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, when former firefighter Dave Fox arrived at the scene, "He saw a wiring harness, and a piston. None of
the other pieces was bigger than a TV remote. He saw three chunks of torn human tissue. He swallowed hard. 'You knew there were people there, but you
couldn't see them,' he says." (Robb Frederick, "The day that changed America," Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, 9/11/2002)
Local FBI agent Wells Morrison told author Glenn Kashurba what he saw when he arrived at the crash site: "We arrived in the immediate area and walked
up to the crater and the burning woods. My first thought was, 'Where is the plane?' Because most of what I saw was this honeycomb looking stuff,
which I believe is insulation or something like that. I was not seeing anything that was distinguishable either as human remains or aircraft debris."
(Glenn Kashurba, Courage After the Crash, 2002, p. 110)
