It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Large Debris Field, No Bodies, No Large Plane Parts. Flight 93? Think again

page: 10
25
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 23 2008 @ 07:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by jfj123
We have no idea what is in the document and neither do you.


Please read the following carefully i am not going to post it again. I have posted it enough times, so either grow up and admit to the facts and move on or do not respond back to me.

1. Yes i do know whats on the doicument i have read it.

2. I cannot post it because it is classified.

3. I have filed a FOIA request to get a declassified copy.

[edit on 23-8-2008 by ULTIMA1]




posted on Aug, 23 2008 @ 08:01 AM
link   
reply to post by ULTIMA1
 


If it is classified you shouldnt even be talking about it, or acknowleging it even exists.



posted on Aug, 23 2008 @ 08:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by tide88
If it is classified you shouldnt even be talking about it, or acknowleging it even exists.


Just stating it is classified does not mean anything. Just go the NSA public website and you can get contact information and file FOIA requests.



posted on Aug, 23 2008 @ 06:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by jfj123
We have no idea what is in the document and neither do you.


Please read the following carefully i am not going to post it again. I have posted it enough times, so either grow up and admit to the facts and move on or do not respond back to me.

1. Yes i do know whats on the doicument i have read it.

2. I cannot post it because it is classified.

3. I have filed a FOIA request to get a declassified copy.

[edit on 23-8-2008 by ULTIMA1]


So just to be completely clear, please explain what is on the document in detail. Thanks.



posted on Aug, 23 2008 @ 09:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by jfj123
So just to be completely clear, please explain what is on the document in detail. Thanks.


If you would have paid attention to my prior post you would know what the document states.

You believers just keep showing that you ignore post because you are living in a fantasy world.



posted on Aug, 23 2008 @ 09:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by jfj123
So just to be completely clear, please explain what is on the document in detail. Thanks.


He hasnt finished writing it up, scanning it, and posting it on his personal webspace yet. Give him another week or so, and we'll see it right next to his documents.



posted on Aug, 23 2008 @ 09:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by gavron He hasnt finished writing it up, scanning it, and posting it on his personal webspace yet.


Just more porve that you are immature and cannot or will not look up information becasue you live in a fantasy world. Thanks again for keep proving my point.

Are you calling the people that i have proven (with proper documents) that have ageed who i am and who i work for liars ?



[edit on 23-8-2008 by ULTIMA1]



posted on Aug, 23 2008 @ 09:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Are you calling the people that i have proven (with proper documents) that have ageed who i am and who i work for liars ?


With your history of posting lies or half truths on this board, I will let the other forum users draw their own conclusions.

To be honest, Im beginning to thing you are actually a dis-information analyst. Posting cryptic posts on multiple forums, to draw attention from whats really happening.



posted on Aug, 23 2008 @ 09:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by gavron
With your history of posting lies or half truths on this board, I will let the other forum users draw their own conclusions.


So let me get this straight, you are calling people that have checked out my documents and agreed they are real liars?

I gues i am going to have to get them in here to defend themselves from you calling them liars.


[edit on 23-8-2008 by ULTIMA1]



posted on Aug, 23 2008 @ 10:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by ULTIMA1
So let me get this straight, you are calling people that have checked out my documents and agreed they are real liars?


Try re-reading my post. Do you even read posts by other users??

I am saying that you only post half-truths, or complete lies. You cry continuously for people to post the official FBI or NTSB report, when you know it has not been released. Do you have some attention disorder we need to be aware of?

I can scroll back in these forums to posts a couple years back, and see you asking the exact same questions. Almost word for word.

Are you telling us all that if you truly DO work for the NSA, you need to come to a public forum to get information to answer your questions? You dont have access to all the "classified" information you need?



posted on Aug, 23 2008 @ 10:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by gavron
I am saying that you only post half-truths, or complete lies.


So you are calling poeple that have agreed with my documents liars?


You cry continuously for people to post the official FBI or NTSB report, when you know it has not been released.


Thanks for agreeing with me again. Yes in know the reports have not been released but beleivers like you still keep stating that they have evidence of what happened when its not even been released.


I can scroll back in these forums to posts a couple years back, and see you asking the exact same questions. Almost word for word.


YEs, i have to keep asking the same questions becasue people like you keep ignoring them or refusing to answer them.




[edit on 23-8-2008 by ULTIMA1]



posted on Aug, 23 2008 @ 10:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by jfj123
So just to be completely clear, please explain what is on the document in detail. Thanks.


If you would have paid attention to my prior post you would know what the document states.

You believers just keep showing that you ignore post because you are living in a fantasy world.



Ok I'll take the hit and say my bad, I didn't see what you posted and cannot find what you posted. Please repost the information explaining what the document contains in detail.
Thanks.



posted on Aug, 23 2008 @ 10:20 PM
link   
That's quite enough!!!!!

Stay on topic and off of each other ...

Please RE-Read the statement at the bottom of the page...

Last warning

Semper



posted on Aug, 23 2008 @ 10:21 PM
link   
edit - removed post to abide by forum moderators request.

[edit on 23-8-2008 by gavron]



posted on Aug, 23 2008 @ 10:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by gavron
I am saying that you only post half-truths, or complete lies.


So again you are saying my documents i posted are lies? I have to get people in here that have looked at my documents to prove you wrong yet again.



posted on Aug, 23 2008 @ 10:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by ThroatYogurt

Although this crash is not exactly like the crash of flight 93, the explanation of details is eerily similar to that of the crash on 9-11 in Shanksville.


Excellent post, TY. This pretty much is the nail in the coffin for those that think there was no plane in the flight 93 crash site. They whole scene looks identical.

Two thumbs up!



posted on Aug, 23 2008 @ 10:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by gavron
Excellent post, TY. This pretty much is the nail in the coffin for those that think there was no plane in the flight 93 crash site. They whole scene looks identical.


Just too bad we have no official reports to back up the media story. I mean we have agredd that the offical reports have not been released.

Too bad there are documents that question the media story.



posted on Aug, 23 2008 @ 10:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by gavron
Excellent post, TY. This pretty much is the nail in the coffin for those that think there was no plane in the flight 93 crash site. They whole scene looks identical.


Just too bad we have no official reports to back up the media story. I mean we have agredd that the offical reports have not been released.

Too bad there are documents that question the media story.


Ok I'll take the hit and say my bad, I didn't see what you posted and cannot find what you posted. Please repost the information explaining what the document contains in detail.
Thanks.



posted on Aug, 23 2008 @ 10:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by jfj123
Please repost the information explaining what the document contains in detail.
Thanks.


See my thread "NSA archives: Flight 93 shot down"

As stated i have seen the document and it states that Flight 93 was intercepted.

onlinejournal.com...

On October 29, 2007, WMR reported: “According to U.S. intelligence sources, the archives of the National Security Agency (NSA), available to cleared users via the INTELINK network, contains an archive of Flash precedence and Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) NSA intelligence messages known as ‘CRITICs.’

One such CRITIC from September 11, 2001, which includes a number of follow-on intelligence reports, concerns United Airlines flight 93, downed over Shanksville, Pennsylvania. However, the CRITIC is at odds with the official account of the fate of United 93, which is that passengers and crew attacked the hijackers and forced the plane to crash into the ground.

The NSA CRITIC, according to sources who have seen it, is about five or six sentences, and paraphrasically states:

“Two F-16s scrambled from Andrews Air Force Base at [likely 1336 Zulu]. Civilian airline hijacked. Over state of Pennsylvania civilian airliner was ‘intercepted’ at (Latitude and Longitude of intercept].”

Several follow-up CRITICs are appended to the first United 93-related CRITIC. One follow-up CRITIC mentioned a possible fifth hijacked plane flying south from Canada that was near the Canadian-U.S. border. Another CRITIC states the plane ‘intercepted’ over Pennsylvania was ‘confirmed civilian.’

On April 16, 2008, WMR reported: “WMR has received another confirmation, bringing the total number to three, that United Flight 93, hijacked on the morning of September 11, 2001, was shot down over rural Pennsylvania by U.S. Air Force jets scrambled from Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland. There are also reports that one F-16 scrambled from Langley Air Force Base in Virginia returned to base minus one air-to-air missile but the National Security Agency CRITIC report specified the interceptors that downed United 93 took off from Andrews.

“The third confirmation, as were the first two, is from a National Security Agency (NSA) source. In fact, a number of personnel who were on watch at the Meade Operations Center (MOC), which is a floor below the NSA’s National Security Operations Center (NSOC), were aware that United 93 was brought down by an Air Force air-to-air missile. Personnel within both the MOC and NSOC have reported the doomed aircraft was shot down.”




[edit on 23-8-2008 by ULTIMA1]



posted on Aug, 23 2008 @ 11:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by ULTIMA1
As stated i have seen the document and it states that Flight 93 was intercepted.


So there is no official report released on this yet, correct? Kinda like the official reports from the FBI and NTSB then correct? Not proof yet, until it has been released.

Until then, it is only your opinion.




top topics



 
25
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join