It took a while, but I'm finally seeing here, evidence that supports that the flight 93 debris field is consistent with a large airliner crash. I have been waiting for something along these lines for sometime, since skeptics and debunkers have constantly decried all the objections to the official story as nonsense.

Here is something that would give more weight to their battle cries. But I must ask; This plane came down at 10 degrees from vertical at 720 MPH. How does this compare to the Flight 93 crash, as mentioned by the OP?

I have never felt that there was some issue with the flight 93 crash story, except it blatant opposition to the notion that it was not shot down. I don't actually think it matters in terms of the overall events of that day, shot down or not, those people died. But I would like to hear some take on the 'debris' field comparison that begs the question.

[edit on 18-8-2008 by Maxmars]

"I was starled by this, uh.... because things were blowing all over the place, 7.... 8 miles away.... and we had what appeared to be millions of pieces of paper...."

That was from the video. I'd never heard of this particular event, although I was in the area at the time. Thanks TY for bringing this to our attention. I've been one of the fence-riders, thinking that it was likely that Flight 93 was shot down. Still not 100% convinced, but I think this is powerful, verifiable, real evidence that airplane crashes don't always manifest themselves in a logical manner, than conditions can exist, particularly with a sharp angle, overfast crash that absolutely obliterate everything.

Good job.

Among the dead were four executives of the Chevron Corporation USA. They were James R. Sylla, president of Chevron U.S.A. Inc., the company's domestic oil and gas subsidiary, and Owen F. Murphy, Jocelyn G. Kempe and Allen F. Swanson, all public affairs executives of Chevron U.S.A. from Southern California. Other fatalities included Wolfgang Studemann, a West German physicist and space scientist who was the director of the Max Planck Institute for Aeronomy in Lindau, West Germany and Dr. Neil Webb, president of Dominican University of California.[1]

Interesting find.

So far as 911 goes the damage is done.

The perp was also involved in the cocaine biz out of Jamaica.

Originally posted by argentus
I'd never heard of this particular event, although I was in the area at the time.

Well how odd. Mind you, I'm not saying this is true, but it could be that this was "manufactured" to "prove" that the 9/11 crash was consistent. I mean... If you lived in the area and didn't hear about it...

Just a thought by one who thinks of many possibilities.

[THIS POST IN RESPONSE TO AMATERASU] - reply function not working


ha! At first I took offense, until I figured out what you meant.

At the time of this crash, I was living in the S.F. Bay area, 100+ miles to the north. Stranger still, is that my "turf" that I drove to check on jobs was at that time all up and down the California coast.

Sooooo, I just went looking for a reference to this crash, and I'll be danged if I can find anything (so far) that doesn't eventually tie back to www.airdisasters.com as the resource. Now, I seriously doubt really that an airplane crash was fabricated to support the Flight 93 circumstances; however, being the person I am, I gotta admit I'm intrigued, and going to go do some more searches. See, I WANT this story to be verifiable. It lends creedence to MY view of Flight 93.

Excellent post, OP, -- I'm not besmirching you or your research. Off to verify.

[edit on 18-8-2008 by argentus]

TY< thanks for the links. Save me hours, no doubt of coffee-induced googling. I'm glad that I can count on this story as evidence toward a desintegration of a commercial airplane.

Originally posted by Maxmars


I wasn't criticizing I am just curious how the angle and speeds compare thats all. Don;t be so defensive, I am glad you found this, and I consider myself a 'truther' of sorts. I want all evidence considered. This has been lacking, and I find it ironic that people never brought this up sooner - this is a strong argument that the Flight 93 crash site is not 'anomalous' as many contended.

Sorry if i seemed defensive. I didn't mean to be.

I am somewhat passionate about flight 93 and have a pretty good grasp on the knowledge surround it. Any questions you may have I can try to answer..or point you where you may find the answers.

Thanks again for your post!