Large Debris Field, No Bodies, No Large Plane Parts. Flight 93? Think again

PSA Flight 1771

Pacific Southwest Airlines Flight 1771 was a commercial flight that crashed near Cayucos, California, December 7, 1987. All 43 people on board the aircraft died, including the man who caused the crash, a disgruntled former employee of USAir, the parent company of PSA. He shot his former supervisor, both the pilots, then himself as the plane went down.

Although this crash is not exactly like the crash of flight 93, the explanation of details is eerily similar to that of the crash on 9-11 in Shanksville.

www.airdisaster.com...

What was very interesting was that although this plane crashed at supersonic speed, a suicide note written by the gunman (on an air-sickness bag) was found.

In addition to the note, parts of the gun used in the killings were found. Amazingly enough, there was a shred of tissue still on the gun that matched the killers fingerprints.

With minimal remnants of a plane remaining, the CVR was still recovered. When analyzed it recorded the shots of the gun and the voice of the killer just prior to shooting the pilots.

Watch this 9 minute video from the BlackBox series:

YouTube Link

"nothing but papers blowing in the breeze"

"things hanging in the trees"

"the thought never occurred to me that this was bits and pieces of a large plane"

"in most cases nothing larger than a mans hand"

"pictures of family members found"

"credit cards"

It took a while, but I'm finally seeing here, evidence that supports that the flight 93 debris field is consistent with a large airliner crash. I have been waiting for something along these lines for sometime, since skeptics and debunkers have constantly decried all the objections to the official story as nonsense.

Here is something that would give more weight to their battle cries. But I must ask; This plane came down at 10 degrees from vertical at 720 MPH. How does this compare to the Flight 93 crash, as mentioned by the OP?

I have never felt that there was some issue with the flight 93 crash story, except it blatant opposition to the notion that it was not shot down. I don't actually think it matters in terms of the overall events of that day, shot down or not, those people died. But I would like to hear some take on the 'debris' field comparison that begs the question.

[edit on 18-8-2008 by Maxmars]

reply to post by ThroatYogurt

---

Great find ThroatYogurt!

Debris was found "7 or 8 miles" away. That sounds familiar.

reply to post by Maxmars

---

Max,

The OP clearly states that the crash is not exactly the same as flight 93. The debris field, quotes from the investigators, size of debris, human remains, etc. They are all very similar.

This video shows again what is expected from a high speed air crash.

Thanks!

-TY-

reply to post by ThroatYogurt

---

You are not gonna see alot of "truthers" in this thread. Watch them claim that this plane was shot down

Great Find. Starred and Flagged

reply to post by Cool Hand Luke

---

Thanks Cool,

Yeah I was thinking the same thing. Almost 200 views and not a truther in site.

Another Similarity:

Flight 93: Ziad Jarrah's damaged passport was found. Truthers often claim this as an anomaly.

Flight 1771:

www.chron.com...

"I was starled by this, uh.... because things were blowing all over the place, 7.... 8 miles away.... and we had what appeared to be millions of pieces of paper...."

That was from the video. I'd never heard of this particular event, although I was in the area at the time. Thanks TY for bringing this to our attention. I've been one of the fence-riders, thinking that it was likely that Flight 93 was shot down. Still not 100% convinced, but I think this is powerful, verifiable, real evidence that airplane crashes don't always manifest themselves in a logical manner, than conditions can exist, particularly with a sharp angle, overfast crash that absolutely obliterate everything.

Good job.

reply to post by ThroatYogurt

---

Not only that, but the barf bag that he wrote his note on to his supervisor was found. A simple, paper bag.

reply to post by argentus

---

Hi Argentus,

Yes, I found that very interesting that a small piece of paper was found. Coincidently, that note was somewhat of a suicide note.

Still interesting how not a single truther has posted an opinion.

Among the dead were four executives of the Chevron Corporation USA. They were James R. Sylla, president of Chevron U.S.A. Inc., the company's domestic oil and gas subsidiary, and Owen F. Murphy, Jocelyn G. Kempe and Allen F. Swanson, all public affairs executives of Chevron U.S.A. from Southern California. Other fatalities included Wolfgang Studemann, a West German physicist and space scientist who was the director of the Max Planck Institute for Aeronomy in Lindau, West Germany and Dr. Neil Webb, president of Dominican University of California.[1]

Interesting find.

So far as 911 goes the damage is done.

The perp was also involved in the cocaine biz out of Jamaica.

reply to post by whiteraven

---

He was not convicted of anything.....but the man was a complete scum bag.

I did read that about the Chevron Execs.

thanks your your post!

-TY-

Well how odd. Mind you, I'm not saying this is true, but it could be that this was "manufactured" to "prove" that the 9/11 crash was consistent. I mean... If you lived in the area and didn't hear about it...

Just a thought by one who thinks of many possibilities.

reply to post by Amaterasu

---

The family's of the victims remember. The NTSB remember. The investigators and search crew remember.

It did in FACT happen:

read about it here:

www.airdisaster.com...

NSTB Summary:

www.ntsb.gov...

Memorial Page:

www.jetpsa.com...

Time Magazine Article: David Burke's Deadly Revenge

www.time.com...





[edit on 18-8-2008 by ThroatYogurt]

[THIS POST IN RESPONSE TO AMATERASU] - reply function not working


ha! At first I took offense, until I figured out what you meant.

At the time of this crash, I was living in the S.F. Bay area, 100+ miles to the north. Stranger still, is that my "turf" that I drove to check on jobs was at that time all up and down the California coast.

Sooooo, I just went looking for a reference to this crash, and I'll be danged if I can find anything (so far) that doesn't eventually tie back to www.airdisasters.com as the resource. Now, I seriously doubt really that an airplane crash was fabricated to support the Flight 93 circumstances; however, being the person I am, I gotta admit I'm intrigued, and going to go do some more searches. See, I WANT this story to be verifiable. It lends creedence to MY view of Flight 93.

Excellent post, OP, -- I'm not besmirching you or your research. Off to verify.

[edit on 18-8-2008 by argentus]

TY< thanks for the links. Save me hours, no doubt of coffee-induced googling. I'm glad that I can count on this story as evidence toward a desintegration of a commercial airplane.

I wasn't criticizing I am just curious how the angle and speeds compare thats all. Don;t be so defensive, I am glad you found this, and I consider myself a 'truther' of sorts. I want all evidence considered. This has been lacking, and I find it ironic that people never brought this up sooner - this is a strong argument that the Flight 93 crash site is not 'anomalous' as many contended.

Sorry if i seemed defensive. I didn't mean to be.

I am somewhat passionate about flight 93 and have a pretty good grasp on the knowledge surround it. Any questions you may have I can try to answer..or point you where you may find the answers.

Thanks again for your post!

reply to post by ThroatYogurt

---

It's cool.

I understand completely.