It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by masonwatcher
reply to post by Fitzgibbon
Originally posted by Fitzgibbon
"Effort"? "Scholarly"? By that definition, everyone who's ever Googled is a scholar in your book. Large book. As for the intent, he's pretty obviously applying Occam's Razor to your posited Rube Goldberg assertions.
Yes scholarly and effort; the man speculatively read my postings stretching back a year back. To what end put collect any information he could. I consider that weird. In fact it also displays a stalker personality.
Originally posted by masonwatcher
Originally posted by Fitzgibbon
He didn't deceive you. He was quite straightforward as to the origin of the information. He only suggested that had he been of a mind to, he could have let you take the bait like a trout and in fact, you would have.
He was quite straightforward in his agenda, deception. He harvested my postings, recycled it and passed off as ominous knowledge. It was shocking as it was meant to be.
In the face of Freemasonry, we are all trouts ready to be skinned.
Originally posted by masonwatcher
Originally posted by Fitzgibbon
Originally posted by JoshNorton
I mean, at first blush it was easy to believe I was part of the gang stalking by my use of such knowledge, when in fact, it was your own paranoia which lead you to jump to that conclusion.
If gangstalking doesn't make you paranoid, then you must be insane. A healthy amount of paranoia keeps you alive otherwise you would walk out into traffic without looking all the time.
Originally posted by masonwatcher
Originally posted by Fitzgibbon
Pretty thin line between a claim and an insinuation. In any case, your "claim" of Mason stalking is pretty wafer-thin stuff if it's of the same value as your concerns about JN's accessing information about you.
Not really. The internet allows for free exchange of information. At the time of JD's deception, I surmised that he may have access to a Masonic stalking forum with all the victims photographs and personal details plastered all over the place. Is there such a forum?
Originally posted by masonwatcher
Originally posted by Fitzgibbon
Re; hoisted by ones own petard
Hmmm....interesting. Doesn't seem to correlate with any definition here. Perhaps you could provide a link to some reputable source that uses it in the manner you refer to.
I know what is the literal definition.
Originally posted by masonwatcher
But I also imparted my take on how masons attack an individual by weaponising their own deeds against them. A different take on being hoisted by one's on petard when the pertard is not a grenade but a shield or any other defensive devise.
Originally posted by masonwatcher
reply to post by Fitzgibbon
In a democracy, it is okay to question institutions but this is evidently something not countenanced by masonic fanatics.
Originally posted by masonwatcher
As individuals you are brainwashed and institutionalised to the extent that you will not accept that you have members that embark up on organised stalking, paedophilia, murder, embezzlement and probably worse.
Originally posted by masonwatcher
Your response to these allegations are always;
A. You are crazy/paranoid/delusional
B. A person has to be in good standing before being accept as a mason
C. Finally, all groups have bad apples.
Originally posted by masonwatcher
Why don't you get off your delusional high horses, engage your bloody all seeing eyes and hunt down the degenerates amongst you instead of splitting hairs with victims?
Originally posted by masonwatcher
After all if you take possession of all the 'good' Freemasonry does then you must accept the evils your members do otherwise you are a hypocrite unless of course that is a 'secret' masonic virtue.