Will Bush Revoke/Re-Write The 22nd Amendment, To Hold A 3rd Term In Office?, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 15-8-2008 @ 06:00 PM by mental modulator
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by SpartanKingLeonidas
Excellant replies so far. Yes, I don't want this to happen, and I think 2/3's of the nation would revolt.

Personally, I think the world would storm our borders if he did something this assinine.


Ridiculous thread, so far, IMO.

Bush can personally overturn a constitutional amendment?

Bush is writing his own laws and congress can't keep up?

Countries would (be allowed to) "storm our borders" if Bush stayed in office.

If the OP is an American, this is a shocking example of lack of knowledge of how the U.S. government works. A foreigner might be forgiven for not understanding this.

IMO, the most likely event that would cause a "revolt" in the U.S. would be if Obama wins and starts trying to gut the military like Carter did.

[edit on 8/15/2008 by centurion1211]


For someone who seems so interested in the fall of Rome you seem to support this modern PLUTOCRACY??? I don't think your an aristocrat either...

Second I would not worry about OBAMA, your boys have it all worked out...

IMO thats when you should worry. I'm gonna go 100% hatchet job!!!

I must say when you get boned enough times you start to sense it before hand.

www.theregister.co.uk...


"We will be attacked on the basis of Article II Section 1, and on Amendment XXII," McIntyre writes. "Thus it is absolutely crucial that the anticipated Executive Order for a Continuity Presidency make no mention whatsoever of a 'Third Term.' This will eliminate appeals to Amendment XXII, and leave us free to focus our attack on Article II Section 1 alone. Thus, the Executive Order has got to be framed as a necessary - and Congressionally authorized - extension of the President's Second Term, so that we can base our arguments on the Joint Resolution and Article II Section 2.



reply posted on 15-8-2008 @ 07:32 PM by Lostinthedarkness



reply posted on 15-8-2008 @ 09:00 PM by SpartanKingLeonidas
reply to post by centurion1211



Yep, I'm American, and I guarantee I do not want this to happen.

You didn't vote for him, did you?

I've studied Ancient Rome and Ancient Greece all of my life, as well as World Politics.


reply posted on 15-8-2008 @ 09:47 PM by zorgon
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas


So ummmm did they ever find that Nuclear weapon that went 'missing' from our arsenal? It made big headlines here but I never followed the end of that



Originally posted by Blueracer
I doubt it. This is just more fear mongering.


How is it fear mongering to accept the inevitable?


[edit on 15-8-2008 by zorgon]


reply posted on 15-8-2008 @ 09:51 PM by SpartanKingLeonidas
reply to post by zorgon



Not sure if you're being serious or sarcastic here. I'll wait to see clarification.


reply posted on 15-8-2008 @ 09:55 PM by Blueracer
reply to post by zorgon



Because it won't happen. Besides, if that's not fear mongering, what is?


reply posted on 15-8-2008 @ 10:00 PM by SpartanKingLeonidas
Originally posted by Blueracer
reply to
post by zorgon



Because it won't happen. Besides, if that's not fear mongering, what is?



If it were fear-mongering, I'd be a politician, now wouldn't I?

By starting this thread I'm only asking a "what if" since Bush has commited so many other crimes against America, there's not a whole lot stopping him from doing this either.

[edit on 15-8-2008 by SpartanKingLeonidas]


reply posted on 16-8-2008 @ 12:23 AM by SpartanKingLeonidas
reply to post by Pawnhaus



I do believe I said something about pitchforks and torches on another post.

And when it comes to Bush and Cheney, nothing would surprise me.


reply posted on 16-8-2008 @ 01:53 AM by NorthWolfe CND
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas



No he can not, with or without congressional approval.
He could have tried it earlier, although I doubt the Congress and the House, dominated by Democrats, would have gone along with it. He would need at least 75% of the votes, from Congress and then from the House of Representatives (sorry, the other way around). After that the proposal would still have to be approved by the Judicial Branch.
Presently there is just not enough time for him to do that, nor would he have the votes from an opposition Congress and House, so this is no more then a rhetorical hypothesis.

Even if he could somehow manage the task he would still have to run as a candidate, and win the election.
So the only possibility of him being the next President would be a Military Coup, highly unlikely, or Martial Law with the postponement of the elections.

I don't believe in any of those scenarios because:
a) Whatever you think of GWB, he would not want his legacy to be that tarnished.
b) His family wouldn't support such an action.
c) There is another Bush on the horizon, Jeb, who someday, I believe soon, will want to run for the office of President, or VP.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^