It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


New drone photo?

page: 1

log in


posted on Aug, 14 2008 @ 08:30 PM
Check it out, fresh off of MUFON a recent pic of a drone from a sighting in France. Could this be more hoax or are the drones legit?

[edit on 14-8-2008 by mcgilligan02]

[edit on 14-8-2008 by mcgilligan02]

[edit on 14-8-2008 by mcgilligan02]

[edit on 14-8-2008 by mcgilligan02]

[edit: resized image]

[edit on 26-8-2008 by 12m8keall2c]

[edit on 26-8-2008 by sanctum]

[edit on 26-8-2008 by 12m8keall2c]

posted on Aug, 14 2008 @ 08:32 PM
due the image appears tiny when you click on it. is there a bigger version.

If it is a new picture of the "drones" then "ohh boy.
Here we go again

posted on Aug, 14 2008 @ 08:34 PM
reply to post by BASSPLYR

sorry trying to edit the pic size ! ! !

posted on Aug, 14 2008 @ 08:40 PM


I thought you meant UCAV and got all excited.

posted on Aug, 14 2008 @ 08:45 PM
thanks for the bigger picture. looks like a cut and paste onto the photo. the reason I say this is because there is a slight blur all around the "drone". looks like it was edited in. Also the drone looks familiar. I'm not sure because I didn't follow the drone story close enough but the "drone" in the photo looks like it was cut from another drone photo. I don't know something about it makes me think that I've seen that exact same shot of the drone it's self minus everything else around the drone. maybe it was cut from a older picture and reversed to make it look like it was going the other way.

[edit on 14-8-2008 by BASSPLYR]

posted on Aug, 14 2008 @ 08:47 PM
Looks like a terrible cut and paste job from the first drone photo set. The lighting is all off for one......

posted on Aug, 14 2008 @ 09:02 PM
I don't know about you but when ever I see a picture of one of those "drones" i want to take a broom stick and wait for one to hover by in my backyard and swing at it.

They just look so delicate. there's a primal and somewhat juvenile side to me that just wants to smash delicate things attempting to invade our planet from space in creepy ways like these "drones" seem to.

Also what's up with the orange picker or industrial batter beater hanging down from the bottom of the thing? I wonder if it's like a stargate transporter like thing but aimed down to drop mini aliens that fly those ships or drones or whatever onto the ground-um...for their invasion. would be fun to pick them off as the beam down with a pinata stick. I might re-petition ATS to start up a team to go play the great soon to be intergalactic sport drone pinata AKA dronata again.

posted on Aug, 14 2008 @ 09:04 PM
without a doubt possibly the worst clone brush/cut paste job i've ever seen there's a definite outline around the drone the sky area to the bottom left is all smudged and thats just looking at it im not going to bother with photoshop!
1/10 for effort 0/10 editing skills, must try harder!

posted on Aug, 14 2008 @ 09:19 PM
allright, allright I should of put my glasses on prior to looking at this supposed drone pic. I like looking at and reading the posts at MUFON, but
dang, they need a mod to review these posts over there. Case closed then. thanks everyone.

posted on Aug, 14 2008 @ 09:28 PM

Originally posted by Dulcimer
Looks like a terrible cut and paste job from the first drone photo set. The lighting is all off for one......

haha...drones are a hoax

posted on Aug, 14 2008 @ 09:31 PM
You know, I zoomed on the object a bit, and uh, to me, it looks like the fabled Stork of legend, with a white-cloth bag, possibly containing babies, on its back.

No really, check it out.

posted on Aug, 14 2008 @ 09:37 PM
I really like how it casts a shadow against the sky. That shadow thing has been a real head scratcher with these things. Must be the plasma field or another malfunctioning cloak or maybe it just brought along too big a chunk of its native physics. Must have something to do with the closeness of 2012.

posted on Aug, 14 2008 @ 10:29 PM
ES did a post on that and have you read the text that accompanied the foto at mufon?. It was hilarious. It was an english person trying to sound like a fr person with bad accent using a variety of mixed verb tenses and deliberate mispells yet has chunks of perfect grammar in other parts. I will port in a moment. FWO that was funny..hahaha a drone stork.

[edit on 14-8-2008 by Sys_Config]
Long Description of Sighting Report

(soory for my bas english)
hello, I walked on the banks of the Seine River in the late afternoon with my camera.

I stop and take a photo of Austerlitz bridge near the Gare de Lyon, I look at the photo that I took, and I noticed an object on the screen.

I note his eyes to heaven and sees a kind of device a large, I can not gauge the distance.

The time frame for that I take another photo, the object had disappeared.

This was neither an airplane or a helicopter or a bird or a balloon.

I had time to see that the lower part of the apparatus tournais on itself, regardless of the upper part, which was fixed.

I have never seen such a thing, I do not believe in UFOs.

A friend who I showed the photo has helped me do research on the internet and I recognized the same purpose that I had seen on an English site, I believe, observed in the USA.

They called it "a drone," a kind of surveillance aircraft, but I've never seen a Paris or elsewhere.

I can swear that it was amazing, and most incredible is that nobody else has seen the object at the same time as me.

The same friend told me not to disseminate the original photo, I have not fully understood, but I would join the photo in small, for the moment ...

I'm still excited about what I saw, and I can tell you that I lift his eyes to heaven every day since Monday.

Tournais on itself?

He knows possessive my camera, then goes on to say I turned his eyes , not my eyes. when he did not know rotate , he used tournais, but the reflexive is to use mon my , this was intentional, not for lack of speaking ability.

anyway, as pix get better, the testimony must be scrutinized very carefully..this could have been dismissed, just without the picture.


@ MC dont worry, we know about the bad spoofing at mufon, its terrible. but good practice to post text with pic is possible so we all can pick up errors in the text that accompanies. I go there all time anticipating these very drones, because we know that was done with witnesses on early pictures. after a few, you can spot the same person, in other hoax attempts.
so don't feel bad at all ok? this is good practice.

[edit on 14-8-2008 by Sys_Config]

[edit on 14-8-2008 by Sys_Config]

posted on Aug, 14 2008 @ 10:35 PM
CG layer overlay on a photo of the skyline IMHO. The shadow looks like an artifact of smudging the hard shadow outline of the shading filter.

posted on Aug, 25 2008 @ 10:12 PM
Looks kind of like the lamp in Aladin. Are aliens flying around in old oil lamps now, and with oil prices so high . . . .

posted on Aug, 25 2008 @ 10:17 PM
Looks photoshopped to me.

The blur effects, the failed attempt to hide anti aliasing, the attempt to add a hole in the cloud by adding blue, and the fact that the lighting of the probe is different than the city. Shadows are all bad.

Would have been better to just 3d model it yourself than photoshop it.

posted on Aug, 26 2008 @ 05:13 AM
This picture was posted and discussed in another thread opened showing the same picture : -

posted on Aug, 26 2008 @ 06:45 AM
reply to post by bmdefiant

That thread wes redirected to this one by the MODs.

[edit on 8/26/2008 by AlienCarnage]

posted on Aug, 26 2008 @ 09:16 AM
Cheers thanks for that AlienCarnage..seems like both threads came to the same conclusion...rubbish

new topics

top topics


log in