It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by enigmania
Originally posted by Deaf Alien
No, air and gravity is not involved. This is HORIZONTAL force, not vertical. So gravity doesn't apply.
Originally posted by enigmania
reply to post by Valhall
That still doesn't explain how they would prevent the shuttle from perpetual spin in the opposite direction of the last fired thruster, in a non-friction environment.
I'm not talking about stopping the shuttle in orbit, I'm talking about axis rotation while in orbit.
Originally posted by Deaf Alien
Originally posted by enigmania
No, air and gravity is not involved. This is HORIZONTAL force, not vertical. So gravity doesn't apply.
Originally posted by enigmania
Originally posted by Deaf Alien
Originally posted by enigmania
No, air and gravity is not involved. This is HORIZONTAL force, not vertical. So gravity doesn't apply.
Doesn't the force of gravity pulling down on the ball exert some force against me throwing it.
Isn't the force I must use, because of gravity, to lift and throw the ball, the equal force that moves me?
Originally posted by enigmania
reply to post by Valhall
So, technically speaking, is it possible to fully stabilize a spinning object in space, without having to perpetually correct its spin?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Or, email NASA....I don't know how you'd do it, but the answers are out there...go study and learn!!!!
Originally posted by weedwhacker
So, thanks for the gyro bit....perfect sense, there....not sure about the conservation of energy problem.....but that's why the ISS needs occasional replenishing of supplies, right?
BUT, doesn't the ISS (or Shuttle) need ot re-orient, occasionally, to control the uneven heating effects, from the Sun?