C-130 video confirms 84th RADES Data, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 18-8-2008 @ 09:14 AM by Boone 870
reply to post by baffledon911

Why isnt its flight path shown here on the RADES data? Wouldnt the C130 guy happen to notice the E4 or be warned of its presence above the pentagon.


The answer to both of your questions can be found here. Click the link that says "Marco Bollettino's RADES w/NEADS audio mix."

The C-130 was approximately 15 miles northwest of the Pentagon when the E-4B departed from Andrews.


reply posted on 18-8-2008 @ 03:50 PM by mirageofdeceit
reply to post by Nola213



The cabby, even had time to get out of his car and remove the light pole that the 500 mph plane supposedly knocked down from his windshield before hearing the crash. That cab driver must be as fast as the Flash. Because if the plane did hit those poles, it would have smashed into the pentagon less than 1 second later.

Amazing psy-ops on the part of the US government I must say.

An excellent point.

I raised this ages ago but forgot about it.

Starred!

One thing the debunkers can't refute is the physics. His testimony is what it is, and it can't be changed.

[edit on 18-8-2008 by mirageofdeceit]


reply posted on 18-8-2008 @ 04:13 PM by Boone 870
reply to post by SPreston

The other three E-4B National Airborne Operations Center aircraft were all tied up in the war games Tricky Dick scheduled as a cover for 9-11.


SPreston, please stop lying, you are embarrassing yourself.

A hijacked airliner plowed into one section of the five-sided building in Washington, D.C., at 9:43 a.m.

Minutes later, an E-4B National Airborne Operations Center - a white 747 Jumbo Jet often confused with Air Force One - took off from Wright-Pat for an undisclosed destination. Link


NWO Overlords:
"Hey fellas, I know this sounds crazy but, let's fly this gigantic 747 over Washington, DC at low altitude to show everyone that we are involved in a NWO/military deception/psych-ops type operation!"


reply posted on 19-8-2008 @ 07:46 AM by Reheat
Originally posted by Boone 870
reply to
post by SPreston

The other three E-4B National Airborne Operations Center aircraft were all tied up in the war games Tricky Dick scheduled as a cover for 9-11.


SPreston, please stop lying, you are embarrassing yourself.


Nah, don't discourage him from posting. Every time I read one of his hilarious posts I laugh so loud that all of the dogs in my neighborhood also start laughing. It turns into a neighborhood howl.....

Intimidate the White House? That's very funny, but I won't bother to ask how.

Jam local radars? I'm sure everyone would be interested to knowing what equipment they used to do this. What radars were jammed?

Serve as a command center for the 9-11 perps? Well, there you have it. Now, we know who the 9-11 perps were. Should be pretty easy to prosecute them in court as who was on the aircraft would be documented.

I wish I had the laughing dog here. This is COMEDY GOLD!



reply posted on 19-8-2008 @ 08:00 AM by Reheat
reply to post by SPreston



You're wasting time on these ignorant posts.

Where is the diagram connecting the dots between NW of the Pentagon (over ANC) to the Tribby video/Looney photographs?

You have this huge problem with your delusion, yet you're delaying proving it. It's almost as if you don't care. You have this huge glaring problem stareing you in the face and you don't post one of your many diagrams showing how it happened.

One might think that you can't do it.


reply posted on 19-8-2008 @ 09:32 AM by jthomas
Originally posted by Reheat
reply to
post by Craig Ranke CIT



Translation = If we ever drew a flight path for any of our incredible claims for aircraft performance or to prove what we say, it would end our fantasy.


ETA: For everyone's benefit... Prior to my arrival on the scene CIT was drawing multiple flight paths to illustrate their claims. Those are in the archives of various Forums where they have posted. In fact, that's what drew my attention to this issue.

Most of the time, they only drew a partial flight path for small segments, not daring to show the full flight path which would have exposed their fantasy sooner. NONE of these flight paths have included numbers to support their plausibility. They were simply lines in a graphic which bore no semblance to reality and would not withstand simple scrutiny from an aerodynamic perspective.

Now, their policy is no flight path.... You get 3 guesses why, two guesses will be wrong!

[edit on 16-8-2008 by Reheat]


Indeed, CIT has proposed numerous flight paths that never go beyond the Pentagon. Here are few recent ones CIT posted on ATS:

www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Not only have you shown it impossible for a jet to fly any of those flight paths aerodynamically, but Ranke cannot produce any extended flight path past the Pentagon: he cannot produce any eyewitnesses from the other side of the Pentagon who saw a flyover.

There is no question that CIT and Rob Balsamo know they have lost.


reply posted on 19-8-2008 @ 09:37 AM by jthomas
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
reply to
post by Reheat



CIT does not have a flight path.


Because Craig knows there are no eyewitnesses to a flyover. See: www.abovetopsecret.com... for a reminder why the CIT fantasy is over.


reply posted on 19-8-2008 @ 02:50 PM by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by beachnut
The fact is an E4B can fly whenever it wants; would you like to know how I know?


Well lets look at the facts.

1. The E-4B is a very sensitive asset, not used for just flying around for fun.

2. The main exercise was in Canada it had no reason being in DC dutring attacks.

www.af.mil...
Mission
The E-4B serves as the National Airborne Operations Center for the president, secretary of defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff or JCS. In case of national emergency or destruction of ground command control centers, the aircraft provides a highly survivable, command, control and communications center to direct U.S. forces, execute emergency war orders and coordinate actions by civil authorities.



reply posted on 19-8-2008 @ 03:03 PM by beachnut
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by beachnut
The fact is an E4B can fly whenever it wants; would you like to know how I know?


Well lets look at the facts.

1. The E-4B is a very sensitive asset, not used for just flying around for fun.

2. The main exercise was in Canada it had no reason being in DC dutring attacks.

www.af.mil...
Mission
The E-4B serves as the National Airborne Operations Center for the president, secretary of defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff or JCS. In case of national emergency or destruction of ground command control centers, the aircraft provides a highly survivable, command, control and communications center to direct U.S. forces, execute emergency war orders and coordinate actions by civil authorities.

10 am on 9/11, an E4B over DC. Oh my! What a non story! Total non issue! And for you being a NSA employee, to make up fake and false implications is pathetic.

The RADES data is correct, makes CIT ideas, pure fantasy; an NSA employee would understand this.

[edit on 19-8-2008 by beachnut]

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 15 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 9 days ago with 13 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 16 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
Remains of 9/11 victim identified
  Posted 1 days ago with 5 member flags
you must try this youre self ????
  Posted 15 days ago with 4 member flags