Scott Cook: "Directly in back of the plume, which would place it almost due west from our office, a four-engine propeller plane, which Ray later said resembled a C-130, started a steep decent towards the Pentagon. It was coming from an odd direction (planes don’t go east-west in the area), and it was descending at a much steeper angle than most aircraft. Trailing a thin, diffuse black trail from its engines, the plane reached the Pentagon at a low altitude and made a sharp left turn, passing just north of the plume, and headed straight for the White House.

All the while, I was sort of talking at it: "Who the hell are you? Where are you going? You’re not headed for downtown!" Ray and Verle watched it with me, and I was convinced it was another attack. But right over the tidal basin, at an altitude of less than 1000 feet, it made another sharp left turn to the north and climbed rapidly. Soon it was gone, leaving only the thin black trail."

Directly in back of the plume, which would place it almost due west from our office

Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
All of the ANC workers saw it approach from the northwest, not southwest.

Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
This is EXACTLY where O'Brien describes himself as having come from...

"Our first sighting of the AA flight was just after we had gone by the mall westbound." -Lt. Col Steve O'Brien

Nothing was "distorted". It is what he says.[/qoute]

Your tactic is not cute or endearing. This is exactly why you're a FRAUD. It's the position you place the aircraft nearly on top of the Mall that is the distortion. If he was where you place the aircraft he could not have seen the Mall as he could have been trying to looking through the bottom of the aircraft. He can't see directly below him, particularly on the right side of the aircraft. It is quite obvious that he was further south of the Mall as the RADES data depicted, but indeed still south of the Mall..

Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
Just like he says that he was so far away when he first saw the explosion that he could not even tell it came from the Pentagon!

"I distinctly remember having a difficult time keeping the AA flight in sight after we turned back to the east to follow it per a request from Wash. Departure Control. When I saw the initial explosion I was not able to see exactly where or what it had impacted, but remember trying to approximate a position to give to ATC."
-Lt. Col Steve O'Brien

Do you really think if the RADES data were true he wouldn't be able to tell that the explosion was coming from the Pentagon??

Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
Get real with yourself for once reheat.

Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
You can't provide a single example of anything being "distorted" yet you have no problem spouting off this lie anyway.

Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
Support your claims reheat.

Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
We provide evidence and you provide none.

Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
The Tribby video has nothing to do with the approach since it was taken minutes AFTER the explosion.

Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
Your desperation is showing.