It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by K67114
I'm absolutly shocked people don't know about this kind of life. And prefer being enslaved. What the American people are livin right now is NOT what the founding fathers wanted for us. I recently found out about Sovereignity and want to know as much as possible. I'd love to be free from the contract I was born into. The more I think about it the more it erks me that not many people stand up and do something... or maybe, liek me.. they dont know where to start?
Originally posted by brickhouse32
For the past few days I had been researching this Freeman-on-the-land stuff, today I got a response from a judge that had been on the bench for 25 years and 6 years as a prosecutor. He said these ideas are all hoax. I tend to believe the judge over a man selling Freedom packets for $380.00. There is some good ideas but I don't think they have the force of law. If this guy did do some of the stuff in his stories, Mr Menard, he merely got away with duping and bullying the police, which would be pretty impressive but not legal.
Originally posted by theindependentjournal
There is a lot more to being a Sovereign in a DeJure government than what you could teach in an ATS thread. State Nationals groups are in most states now. To learn the procedure and the LAW read the red amendment from this link...
I haven't been convicted of any driving offenses or arrested for them in over 20 years using common law. NO DAMAGED PARTY, Court can NOT take jurisdiction.
Ya know what I hate about ATS. Lawyers. There are no lawyers.
I never see anyone say, I'm a lawyer and I can confirm or discount this as truth.
I believe there has to be some good statutes that allow the law to work for good of the people but they are almost unknown or twisted in the public's mind so much we cannot know for sure.. too many opinions about this freeman on the land stuff going around and you never know what you should really believe.
Can we get a lawyer in this thread to give opinions on this?
he legal wording is written as follows :
A citizen is an artificial person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States as per the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution for the United States, and is also subject to those corporate state entities which have contracted with the United States
Under Corporate Personhood with the US as a corporation decrees the citizens of the USA it's employees and decreeing those persons to be the corporate interests which are supported, endorsed and protected by orders of the corporation (the USA) itself. Effectively decreeing Artifical Law dead and in it's place De Facto/Common Law which works with Natural law and not against it. However, De Facto law keeps those who are deputized to maintain and hand out Artificial law the people it empowers to take back control of the dispertion and dispensemet of Artificial law.
The core structure of how law is dispensed in the USA is as follows :