It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Is 9/11 unsolved to you

page: 1

log in


posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 01:30 PM
0. Legally 9/11 is unsolved since no one was read a verdict of guilty by a judge or jury.

^Notice that the event was seen on T.V/video?

1. 9/7 Tupac got shot.

^Notice it wasnt seen on T.V./video as it happened or in rewind of any footage? Notice his murder is unsolved legally?

2. Anthrax attack... 9/something.

^Notice the event wasnt seen on T.V/video as it happened on in rewind of any footage? Notice the attack is unsolved legally since no one was read a verdict of guilty by a judge or jury?

Ha, if you allow somebody to be tagged guilty by the government agencies like they did with Suge concerning Tupac, Bin Laden concerning 9/11, and the one guy dead now suspected behind the anthax attack, then are saying you'd like to be deemed guilty before proven innocent or guilty in a court of law??? You dont know if the suspects were behind it and were paid or extorted by the government to do it and have to be suspects that would never get brought to justice on purpose by the government. Who is to say the government isnt hinding behind their suspects???

The pattern in the U.S. is that all major events deemed crimes go unsolved. What's up with that? Does the government go: 'This is big to ppl so lets make sure it goes unsolved to make it seem like maybe we were behind it to keep ppl scared of us by a different kind of credit fruad where we take over the credit for it'???

Notice though 1 big event (9/11) was seen on TV/video. The other two Sept. related events werent. These events all seem to paint out an inside job. That is the Sign to an unable to be witnessed event concerning another inside job. Plus, it's a Sign that there are two more events that shall be seen on some kind of record that gets solved legally like never before.

Are you ready for the next seeable major events to take place that shall be legally solved unanamously unlike the others?

^What do you think they shall be?

[edit on 13-8-2008 by Mabus]

posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 01:52 PM
Not sure what you're trying to say, but Osama bin Laden isn't even wanted by the FBI for 9/11. He's probably been dead since late 2001 anyway:

FBI says, “No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11”
Global Research, June 10, 2006
Muckracker Report

June 6, 2006 – This past weekend, a thought provoking e-mail circulated through Internet news groups, and was sent to the Muckraker Report by Mr. Paul V. Sheridan (Winner of the 2005 Civil Justice Foundation Award), bringing attention to the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorist web page for Usama Bin Laden.[1] In the e-mail, the question is asked, “Why doesn’t Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster make any direct connection with the events of September 11, 2001?” The FBI says on its Bin Laden web page that Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998 bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. According to the FBI, these attacks killed over 200 people. The FBI concludes its reason for “wanting” Bin Laden by saying, “In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorists attacks throughout the world.”

On June 5, 2006, the Muckraker Report contacted the FBI Headquarters, (202) 324-3000, to learn why Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection with 9/11. The Muckraker Report spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, Tomb said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”

Surprised by the ease in which this FBI spokesman made such an astonishing statement, I asked, “How this was possible?” Tomb continued, “Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11.” I asked, “How does that work?” Tomb continued, “The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice than decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, Bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connected Bin Laden to 9/11.”

It shouldn’t take long before the full meaning of these FBI statements start to prick your brain and raise your blood pressure. If you think the way I think, in quick order you will be wrestling with a barrage of very powerful questions that must be answered. First and foremost, if the U.S. government does not have enough hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11, how is it possible that it had enough evidence to invade Afghanistan to “smoke him out of his cave?” The federal government claims to have invaded Afghanistan to “root out” Bin Laden and the Taliban. Through the talking heads in the mainstream media, the Bush Administration told the American people that Usama Bin Laden was Public Enemy Number One and responsible for the deaths of nearly 3000 people on September 11, 2001. Yet nearly five years later, the FBI says that it has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.

posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 01:54 PM
Well i have to say that 9/11 is still unsolved becasue most of the facts of what happened that day have still not been released by the investigating agencies.

new topics

log in