Originally posted by mattguy404
Well, I wouldn't have used the White House's own figures to prove a point - that seems a tad biased.
You are absolutely right. But you have to understand I'm suffering from a little bit of insomnia right now and it's making me a little lazy. The
point is is that things aren't as bad as the media makes it out to be.
I don't really blame the media because they are doing there job sensationalizing everything in order get ratings and sell papers.
GDP is just one way of measuring a country's economy, and it can be used to prove almost anything a government wants.
Agreed but it works both ways. Biased media can also sensationalize in either direction to prove their point.
GDP doesn't measure the sustainability of growth - growth has obviously been slowing in the US.
Agreed but not nearly as much as the doom sayers make it out to be
If everything was as peachy as the GDP indicates, why on earth is there the stimulus package?
The reason the government gave that stimulus package was because spending went way down real fast because of the price of oil and the mortgage crisis.
It is what it is, just a little shot in the arm that seem to have worked.
Correct me if I'm wrong, the stimulus package was not Bush's idea, I believe it came from congress.
Are you saying that the three separate sources I've used are liberal biased media?
I am saying that all media is biased. Fox leans obviously to the right and CNN, NBC etc tend to lean left.
If so, I would imagine that using the White House's own figures are biased as well.
Agreed if want I will find you some other sources, but right now I'm a zombie.
BTW this was taken at 5:00 AM from
here. Can somebody refute these numbers?
[edit on 13-8-2008 by Cool Hand Luke]
[edit on 13-8-2008 by Cool Hand Luke]