No offence but you sound like a PNAC information leaflet or something:
[What we require is] a military that is strong and ready to meet both present and future challenges; a foreign policy that boldly and purposefully promotes American principles abroad; and national leadership that accepts the United States’ global responsibilities.
To carry out these core missions, we need to provide sufficient force and budgetary allocations. In particular, the United States must:
MAINTAIN NUCLEAR STRATEGIC SUPERIORITY, basing the U.S. deterrent upon a global, nuclear net assessment that weighs the full range of current and emerging threats, not merely the U.S.-Russia balance.
RESTORE THE PERSONNEL STRENGTH of today’s force to roughly the levels anticipated in the “Base Force” outlined by the Bush Administration, an increase in active-duty strength from 1.4 million to 1.6 million.
REPOSITION U.S. FORCES to respond to 21st century strategic realities by shifting permanently-based forces to Southeast Europe and Southeast Asia, and by changing naval deployment patterns to reflect growing U.S. strategic concerns in East Asia. (iv)
NO.
What the US Needs is good, old-fashioned dose of ISOLATION.
To keep it's nose as far away from other people's business as is possible, so we don't get drawn into more Iraqs, Afghanistans, Irans or Georgias.
Can you not see how counter-productive Bush's Foreign Policy is?
Right, let's not fix the root problem of being involved in multiple theatres of battle constantly.
Instead lets make our ridiculous lifestyle more pleasant and comfortable for ourselves by improving our armed forces.
"Hey instead of not banging my head into a wall repeatedly, I'll wear a helmet and reduce the sideeffects!"



I am utterly appalled by people like William Kristol calling for military confrontation with
Russia.