|
reply posted on 2-9-2008 @ 12:39 PM by NOTurTypical
|
?
I'm lost here. You realize "B.C." stands for "before CHRIST" right?
And His 2nd coming to Earth hasn't happened yet, there hasn't even been a 3rd temple built in Jerusalem yet.
We are between His 1st coming, and His 2nd.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-9-2008 @ 12:43 PM by Bone Collector
|
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
?
I'm lost here. You realize "B.C." stands for "before CHRIST" right?
And His 2nd coming to Earth hasn't happened yet, there hasn't even been a 3rd temple built in Jerusalem yet.
We are between His 1st coming, and His 2nd.
Sorry typo on my part.........either way first one did not happen so no reason to believe the second one will................
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-9-2008 @ 12:48 PM by NOTurTypical
|
Originally posted by Bone Collector
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
?
I'm lost here. You realize "B.C." stands for "before CHRIST" right?
And His 2nd coming to Earth hasn't happened yet, there hasn't even been a 3rd temple built in Jerusalem yet.
We are between His 1st coming, and His 2nd.
Sorry typo on my part.........either way first one did not happen so no reason to believe the second one will................
First one what? Those who said other ones would happen (2nd coming) refused to acknowledge that scripture said certain things must happen first.
All preceding prophecies have come true, the next event on the prophetic timeline is the Gog Magog war (WW 3), then it's the rapture.
Heck, the 2nd coming cannot happen until 1,260 days after the "abomination of desolation." And even for that to happen there needs to be a 3RD
TEMPLE in Jerusalem.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-9-2008 @ 12:51 PM by Bone Collector
|
Whatever you say but I would not hold my breath you may turn blue....
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 2-9-2008 @ 01:01 PM by NOTurTypical
|
Originally posted by Bone Collector
Whatever you say but I would not hold my breath you may turn blue....
Hold my breath for what? The next event on the prophecy timeline is WW 3.
That will start when Israel bombs Iran.
Man, John sure was a smart cookie to tell us all these things in 95 AD.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-9-2008 @ 05:25 PM by Bone Collector
|
Well I hope for your sake and all the Suicide Propheteers sake you get your wish........ever seen what a nuclear blast does to people? It ain't
pretty. John was smart alright if you call psychotic smart.
[edit on 9/2/2008 by Bone Collector]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-9-2008 @ 05:40 PM by NOTurTypical
|
Originally posted by Bone Collector
Well I hope for your sake and all the Suicide Propheteers sake you get your wish........ever seen what a nuclear blast does to people? It ain't
pretty. John was smart alright if you call psychotic smart.
[edit on 9/2/2008 by Bone Collector]
??? The men launching the nukes are the psychos. John simply told us what would happen.
He received a vision of the future, he didn't give orders for man to do so.
I was being sarcastic with the "smart" comment, pointing out that it was a vision from God that John saw these things 2,000 years ago. He wasn't
"smart" for guessing them, it was God revealing what would happen at the end.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-9-2008 @ 05:54 PM by Bone Collector
|
Alright, got it...........
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 10:05 PM by cormag
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 10:12 PM by NOTurTypical
|
If I had to guess it's Abadnon. (sp?)
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 10:16 PM by For(Home)Country
|
I did not realize there was a war still raging in this thread.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 10:19 PM by NOTurTypical
|
Originally posted by For(Home)Country
I did not realize there was a war still raging in this thread.
Absolutely!
How are you doing brother?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 10:31 PM by cormag
|
reply to post by NOTurTypical
its the son of the devil, he who killed jesus. i forgot wat his name is. but i no it isnt longinus anymore. i think its damien. but i'm not sure.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 10:42 PM by NOTurTypical
|
Originally posted by cormag
reply to post by NOTurTypical
its the son of the devil, he who killed jesus. i forgot wat his name is. but i no it isnt longinus anymore. i think its damien. but i'm not sure.
Jesus is God, he was made flesh. He wasn't "killed" so to speak, but gave His spirit up freely. If He desired He easily could have freed Himself
from the cross, but that was not His purpose. If you read the scriptures, He gave up His spirit before Longinus pierced His side. His side was
pierced to make sure He was in fact dead. he cried out loud "It is finished" and His spirit left Him and He slumped. The Roman centurion pierced
Him to make sure He was dead.
After Jesus’ death, the soldiers break the legs of the two criminals crucified alongside Him (John 19:32), causing suffocation. Death would then
occur quicker. When they came to Jesus, He was already dead so they did not break His legs (John 19:33). Instead, the soldiers pierced His side (John
19:34) to assure that He was dead. In doing this, it is reported that “blood and water came out” (John 19:34), referring to the watery fluid
surrounding the heart and lungs.
www.apu.edu...
It also fulfilled prophecy which stated not one of His bones would be broken.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 11:05 PM by cormag
|
reply to post by NOTurTypical
when the spear pierced jesus he "left his body", not the cross. christians get that part confused alot.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 11:19 PM by Clearskies
|
reply to post by cormag
You mean, 'the Spear of destiny'?
Along with the grail.
A BIG part of the antichrist religion.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 11:44 PM by NOTurTypical
|
Originally posted by cormag
reply to post by NOTurTypical
when the spear pierced jesus he "left his body", not the cross. christians get that part confused alot.
No, the spear didn't kill him. Did you read even the medical description of a crucifixion?
Maybe us Christians believe it a certain way because that is what the Bible clearly says.
It's also pertinent to note that unlike the 2 robbers, the Roman soldiers didn't have to break Christ's legs, he was already dead.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-9-2008 @ 12:22 AM by cormag
|
reply to post by NOTurTypical
the vatican lied and said he was killed by the cross. everything having to do with christ in europe is overlooked by the vatican. u cant believe
everything in the bible for the vatican doesnt want everyone to no the power of the spear, so they made changes in the bilbe. u can find this in one
of the many books the vatican keeps locked away.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-9-2008 @ 12:22 AM by cormag
|
reply to post by NOTurTypical
the vatican lied and said he was killed by the cross. everything having to do with christ in europe is overlooked by the vatican. u cant believe
everything in the bible for the vatican doesnt want everyone to no the power of the spear, so they made changes in the bilbe. u can find this in one
of the many books the vatican keeps locked away.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-9-2008 @ 12:27 AM by cormag
|
reply to post by Clearskies
the grail is just a cup that will heal u of wat ill's u and make u feel younger. it is not part of the antichrist religion.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |