Originally posted by Incarnated
Most psychology majors study psychology because the believe there's something wrong with their own heads. They also want to believe there is
something wrong with your head.
I think that's called projection, lol.
So, tell me about your past...had any bad experiences with psychologists and psychiatrists...
The closest thing to true psychology is behaviorisim.
I'm sure Skinner would have been chuffed.
Originally posted by Tsuki-no-Hikari
So...how is Psychology not an observational science?
Of course it is. The problem is that many people appear to mix up the pop-psychology BS, psychoanalysis, and other forms of pseudopsychology with what
psychologists actually do. For example...
Psychology is a big bull#. I studied Psychology at university for three years. Now I quit this # and Im preparing to enter the Medical
University. You go for more to 10 years to a analist, speak some bull#, hear more bull#, pay a lot to nothing. Than you have some magical drug for
some minutes and you are enlighted and free...
PSYCHOLOGY=BULL#=FREUD
lol
There is the applied stuff - counsellors, random therapists, educational, industrial, clinical, sports etc etc. These people apply the science
produced elsewhere, and sometimes do research themselves.
And there is the fundamental research, which is where the science is mainly done. And it uses both quantitative and qualitative methods.
Look! Science!
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
2008 Volume 137, Issue 4 (Nov)
Memory in posttraumatic stress disorder: Properties of voluntary and involuntary, traumatic and nontraumatic autobiographical memories in people with
and without posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms.
Pages 591-614
Rubin, David C.; Boals, Adriel; Berntsen, Dorthe
Abstract | Full Text PDF | Full Text HTML | Permissions
Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: Evidence for metacognitive illusions.
Pages 615-625
Rhodes, Matthew G.; Castel, Alan D.
Abstract | Full Text PDF | Full Text HTML | Permissions
Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
Pages 626-648
Griffiths, Oren; Mitchell, Chris J.
Abstract | Full Text PDF | Full Text HTML | Permissions
Automatic and controlled response inhibition: Associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms.
Pages 649-672
Verbruggen, Frederick; Logan, Gordon D.
Abstract | Full Text PDF | Full Text HTML | Permissions
Retraction of Hard, Lozano, and Tversky (2006).
Page 672
Hard, B. M.; Lozano, S. C.; Tversky, B.
Abstract | Full Text PDF | Full Text HTML | Permissions
Will a category cue attract you? Motor output reveals dynamic competition across person construal.
Pages 673-690
Freeman, Jonathan B.; Ambady, Nalini; Rule, Nicholas O.; Johnson, Kerri L.
Abstract | Full Text PDF | Full Text HTML | Permissions
Stereotype threat and executive resource depletion: Examining the influence of emotion regulation.
Pages 691-705
Johns, Michael; Inzlicht, Michael; Schmader, Toni
Abstract | Full Text PDF | Full Text HTML | Permissions
Spontaneous gestures during mental rotation tasks: Insights into the microdevelopment of the motor strategy.
Pages 706-723
Chu, Mingyuan; Kita, Sotaro
Abstract | Full Text PDF | Full Text HTML | Permissions
I see Ambady's name in there. She was involved in the super study of person perception which experimentally demonstrated that a 'thin-slice' (30
seconds, IIRC) of behaviour was sufficient to influence longer term social judgement - first impressions last and all that.
The paper about resource depletion sounds interesting, a while back a couple of good papers (Shelton & Richeson) showed how exposure to race
information depletes activity in the frontal lobe. This effect was related to the 'implicit' race bias of a participant, suggesting that people with
covert race biases use areas of the frontal lobe to regulate the more reflexive emotion-based reaction.
Ooh! Bad Amos Tversky (he's dead now, though) - I see a retraction. He's the dude who worked with Dan Kahneman on heuristics and biases in
decision-making. Showing, for example, how 'framing' of decisions alters behaviour with logically equivalent problems. This showed the idea of the
uber-rational homo economicus to be a bit of a fantasy. More recently, Ray Dolan at UCL has demonstrated how such framing appears to rely on the
amygdala, and overcoming it on the orbitomedial PFC - an emotional process. Fantastic stuff.
That's science!
[edit on 19-12-2008 by melatonin]