Take the Zeitgeist Challenge, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times


reply posted on 9-8-2008 @ 11:31 AM by ken10
reply to post by Conspiriology



Hey con,

I stated that i wanted the world to unite and i feel religion is preventing this, To which your reply is the proof ?

Do you not see that.


reply posted on 9-8-2008 @ 11:36 AM by Conspiriology
Originally posted by sotp
What is funny is that you laugh at his claim you are "Reality Challenged", because he is quite right! You call all posters who do not agree "trolls" when clearly you are one yourself. I love the way you call Darwinism a great lie when there seems to be supporting evidence all over the place yet little to no evidence of the existence of Jesus.




So would you care to debate me on that then? Ill prove that every single solitary piece of evidence to substantiate Darwinian Macro Evolution is bunk and that the theory can't be tested and observed.

That we carry the seed of our own kind and no other kind and have since the begining of mans existence on this planet.


I also love the way you just happen to know this Monsignor MacAvoy from the "whore" Catholic church personally and are able to take him to task with such questions.


Well that's because I don't know him, I just made that up so you would see how easy it is just like you did when you made it up.


Wait, what's that smell? It smells a bit like, well, effluent! I can see why your ATS points are well into the negative....


They used to be -8000


Say there had never been a Jesus, or a bible or any Christian church etc. You go about your business worshipping the Sun or the Moon or that phallically shaped vegetable you found one day or whatever. Then one day, some dude shows up claiming your belief system is way off, that he is the son of the one who created everything, and you will suffer horribly for all eternity if you did not follow his teachings. Would you instantly believe him? I doubt very much that you would. Chances are you'd think he was nuts. Miracles? You'd probably suspect he was pulling some David Blaine type stunts. So why is it that just because the story is almost 2000 years old and you pay some guys wearing robes in fancy buildings to tell you it's true you think it has more credibility? Why (in your eyes) does Christianity have more Validity than any other religion? What makes you right and Muslims, Jews, Hindus etc. wrong?


This ,, mmmm you asked me one of the most intelligent questions I have ever been asked since coming here. So impressed am I with this question that I must answer it with at least as much genuine care and concern in my answer as you obviously did in this well thought out question. Whether you came up with it off the cuff or not, I am dead serious it impressed me so I will have to take the time to write this one as I feel it truly deserves to be answered.




To the OP - nice avatar, but I'm afraid I have to nominate you for the B.D.I.U award along with Conspiriology...


Ha ha ha well,, as long as i get top billing over whammy! HA HA

Good Post

- Con
PS; Ill try to have an answer sometime late this afternoon for that question


[edit on 9-8-2008 by Conspiriology]



reply posted on 9-8-2008 @ 11:51 AM by sotp
reply to post by Conspiriology



I look forward to your reply!

When it comes to the Darwinian question, well, I'm no biologist hence the word "seems" in my statement. But to my mind, even if he isn't 100% correct, Darwin's theory is a lot more believable than the Genesis fable.

And as for the Monsignor comment? Well, you don't lend your argument a lot of credence when you are slipping in little fibs here and there, do you?


reply posted on 9-8-2008 @ 11:52 AM by SRTkid86
reply to post by Conspiriology



im no christian but i know quite a few (my entire family just about)

and your condescending attitude is not the way to go about trying to show that somehow your way of living is any better than mine.


reply posted on 9-8-2008 @ 12:06 PM by Conspiriology
Originally posted by Nola213
Originally posted by ken10
The problem is even in the 21st century some people are still unable to live life through their own morals and common sense, and cannot trust their own judgment. They constantly seek approval and pats on the back Just like a dog serving its master.........No wonder the term sheeple is used.

Imho the sooner religion is dumped the sooner we as a world can unite as one.


100% agreed, more blood has been shed in religious wars than all the other wars combined.

While mostly all religions agree that killing another person is wrong it's pretty ironic huh?

I also don't think a "loveing" god would allow 5 year old children to be raped, and murdered. If there is a God, and he does have the power to do anything, and allows this type of stuff to go on, well I'd like to see his or her sadistic a$$ hung.


here's an entertaining piece, which pretty much sums up my feelings on religion

www.youtube.com...




I also don't think a "loveing" god would allow 5 year old children to be raped, and murdered. If there is a God, and he does have the power to do anything, and allows this type of stuff to go on, well I'd like to see his or her sadistic a$$ hung.


It's Gods Fault? ha ha No like entire post is,,

WRONG!

God gave man free moral agency, something Atheists believe they do right because it is the right thing to do. Was that 5 year old dying the right thing to have done?

Nope, and I am certain God suffers for that more than anyone, even the childs parents don't suffer for the sins man causes than God does.

This is what happens when we devolve and not evolve. This is what happens when you have a freewill without any interference from God where man has Choices he makes to define his moral soul.

This is what happens when Atheists who Hate God in any way shape or form wanting him out of our lives and the entire planet.

God doesn't force relationships and has every right to know who loves him because WE WANT TO , not because we have to. You want to hate God for what Man does and use that to justify your stance on religion and God in general??

Yet you want GOD to be fair? and decide for him what a "true loving" God should do? I was going to explain how absurd this kind of thinking is but,,

I don't think there is any point with someone like this.

A recent comprehensive compilation of the history of human warfare, Encyclopedia of Wars by Charles Phillips and Alan Axelrod documents 1763 wars, of which 123 have been classified to involve a religious conflict.3 So, what atheists have considered to be "most" really amounts to less than 7% of all wars. It is interesting to note that 66 of these wars (more than 50%) involved Islam, which did not even exist as a religion for the first 3,000 years of recorded human warfare.

"

TABLE 3.1
Selected Pre-20th Century Democide and Totals1

Cases Years2 Democide3 Religious?

China 221 B.C.-19 C. 33,519,0004 No
Mongols 14 C-15 C 29,927,000 No
Slavery of Africans 1451-1870 17,267,000 No
Amer-Indians 16 C-19 C 13,778,000 No
Thirty Years War 1618-1648 5,750,000 No
In India 13 C-1 9 C 4,511,0005 No
In Iran 5 C-19 C 2,000,0004,5 No
Ottoman Empire 12 C-19 C 2,000,0005 No
In Japan 1570-19 C 1,500,0005 No
In Russia 10 C-19 C 1,007,0005 No
Christian Crusades 1095-1272 1,000,000 Yes
By Aztecs Centuries 1,000,0006 No
Spanish Inquisition 16 C-18 C 350,000 Yes
French Revolution 1793-1794 263,000 No
Albigensian Crusade 1208-1249 200,000 Yes
Witch Hunts 15 C-17 C 100,000 Yes

Total For All Cases pre-20 C 133,147,000 1,650,000
Hypothetical Total 30 C B.C.-19 C A.D. 625,716,0007

International war-related dead 30 C B.C.-19 C A.D. 40,457,0008
Plague dead (Black Death) 541 A.D.-1912 102,070,0009

Adopted from STATISTICS OF DEMOCIDE.
Unless otherwise noted, years and centuries are A.D.
Unless otherwise noted, these are a best guess estimate in a low to high range.
Excludes democide in China by Mongols.
An absolute low.
A very speculative absolute low.
From STATISTICS OF DEMOCIDE.. Calculated from the 20th century democide rate and the population for each century since 30 B.C.
From table STATISTICS OF DEMOCIDE. Total undoubtedly inflated by democide.
A minimum: includes plague dead in circa 541-542 A.D.; 1346-1771 in Europe; 1771 in Moscow; 1894 in Hong Kong; and 1898-1912 in India. From Duplaix (1988, p. 677-678).
What percentage of these killings were due to religious democide? It is less than 3% of the totals. The surprising thing is that these killings occurred during a period of time when virtually all the peoples of the world were involved in some sort of religion. Here is the data for the 20th century:

TABLE 1.2
20th Century Democide1

REGIMES YEARS DEMOCIDE2 Atheist?

U.S.S.R. 1917-87 61,911,000 Yes
China (PRC) 1949-87 35,236,000 Yes
Germany 1933-45 20,946,000 No
China (KMT) 1928-49 10,075,000 No
Japan 1936-45 5,964,000 No
China (Mao Soviets)3 1923-49 3,466,000 Yes
Cambodia 1975-79 2,035,000 Yes
Turkey (Armenian Genocide) 1909-18 1,883,000 No
Vietnam 1945-87 1,670,000 Yes
Poland 1945-48 1,585,000 Yes
Pakistan 1958-87 1,503,000 No
Yugoslavia (Tito) 1944-87 1,072,000 Yes
North Korea 1948-87 1,663,000 Yes
Mexico 1900-20 1,417,000 No
Russia 1900-17 1,066,000 Yes
China (Warlords) 1917-49 910,000 No
Turkey (Ataturk) 1919-23 878,000 No
United Kingdom 1900-87 816,000 No
Portugal (Dictatorship) 1926-82 741,000 No
Indonesia 1965-87 729,000 No
LESSER MURDERERS 1900-87 2,792,000 ?
WORLD TOTAL 1900-87 169,202,000 107,047,000

From STATISTICS OF DEMOCIDE.
Includes genocide, politicide, and mass murder; excludes war-dead. These are probable mid-estimates in low to high ranges. Figures may not sum due to round off.
Guerrilla period.
Vox Day, in The Irrational Atheist, lists 22 atheistic regimes that committed 153,368,610 murders in the 20th century alone:
Murders by Atheists (20th Century)

Country Dates Murders
Afghanistan 1978–1992 1,750,000
Albania 1944–1985 100,000
Angola 1975–2002 125,000
Bulgaria 1944–1989 222,000
China/PRC 1923–2007 76,702,000
Cuba 1959–1992 73,000
Czechoslovakia 1948–1968 65,000
Ethiopia 1974–1991 1,343,610
France 1793–1794 40,000
Greece 1946–1949 20,000
Hungary 1948–1989 27,000
Kampuchea/Cambodia 1973–1991 2,627,000
Laos 1975–2007 93,000
Mongolia 1926–2007 100,000
Mozambique 1975–1990 118,000
North Korea 1948–2007 3,163,000
Poland 1945–1948 1,607,000
Romania 1948–1987 438,000
Spain (Republic) 1936–1939 102,000
U.S.S.R. 1917–1987 61,911,000
Vietnam 1945–2007 1,670,000
Yugoslavia 1944–1980 1,072,000



Yes, "Christians" have committed atrocities against other religious and non-religious people. However, atheists have committed far more atrocities than all religious groups combined. Even so, the key factor in these atrocities has been totalitarian power, rather than religion, which has resulted in these hundreds of millions of murders. The Bible says that people are evil (and the statistics on this page support this claim), but that they can become transformed through the power of the Holy Spirit to live lives of love, joy and peace.



So much for that "stuff" about eveil violent religion. That Atheist drivel is getting real old. Ya know?

If you weren't always googling for bad things you can find out about religion,, you might find the overwhelming GOOD that it does.

That isn't part of your agenda though

is it

- Con


reply posted on 9-8-2008 @ 12:12 PM by Conspiriology
Originally posted by SRTkid86
reply to
post by Conspiriology



im no christian but i know quite a few (my entire family just about)

and your condescending attitude is not the way to go about trying to show that somehow your way of living is any better than mine.


I never did, if you look at the posts and who I am talking to and WHY I am saying to THEM not YOU but THEM what I am saying, you might come away with a more accurate perspective. I am defending attacks made about my Religion and I usually get defensive when I am being attacked.

I haven't preached or given a single verse of scripture and I am not telling anyone I am better than they are, on the contrary it is suggested that I be the one "not living in reality" it is suggested I AM the one not living in the 21st century not having trust in my own judgement among many more personal ad-hom innuendos.



If you don't like it

Too bad

- Con


reply posted on 9-8-2008 @ 12:30 PM by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by justamomma
Originally posted by Bigwhammy
reply to
post by justamomma



Ridiculous... I have every right and even a moral obligation to expose frauds and charlatans. Jesus went into the temple and violently overturned the tables of the con men... All I'm doing is challenging you for evidence. I do find it amusing that you think I have no right to use satire or refute lies because I am a Christian. You are really threatened by the idea it is true aren't you.


Who was Jesus rebuking when he went into the temple?? It wasn't everyday normal folks, those that you probably would laugh at as they are cast into hell...... it was ppl like you. Pious, self righteous hypocrites. PPL that used the normal folks who just wanted to live a good life... the ppl that used "sinners", degraded them, and mocked them.

I think you need to go to your room and beg for forgiveness from your saviour for using his name as a catalyst for your self righteous behaviour otherwise you might find yourself next to me in my handbasket (which is fully loaded w/ all the comforts you would probably deem reprobate).
Wrong, when he went to the temple and was rebuking them there it was people who were using the temple as a flea market.

He condemned all, he told all they needed salvation, he was set against the Pharasiees because they were teaching a self-righteous adhearance to the law, and he was teaching the sinners that they needed to repent and seek God first.


reply posted on 9-8-2008 @ 12:42 PM by spookjr
reply to post by Bigwhammy

I dont quite get it. Its been proven that the Gulf of Tonkin incident didnt happen. Its also been proven that Standard Oil sold all kinds of things to I.G. Farben. Its been proven that Prescott Bush Of the New York Banking Company(or whatever the name is) did in fact assist at least to some degree various Nazi characters. There are some facts in the film that are at the very least, really stretching reality but there are some that are absolute fact. I for one care not one bit about part one, as I have faith in me and me only. Who gives a crap about whether or not Jesus really existed? Let the Christians have their faith.



[edit on 9-8-2008 by spookjr]


reply posted on 9-8-2008 @ 12:45 PM by justamomma
I would not catagorize every individual christian in this manner, but the overwhelming majority of christians in today's modern world use christianity (and jesus) to feed into their sense of superiority.

If it were really about trying to be "like Christ," then A. This thread would not exist, and B. The pompous attitude of a few on here claiming to be Christian would have been rebuked by the true christians bc again, the most harsh words Jesus used were directed to the pharisees (those that that used religion to mock and degrade others) and not the sinners.

Christianity has become more of a club used to degrade and push self righteous morality onto others.

Jesus would have not been caught dead (no pun intended ) trying to defend his faith. He died for it, but it was evident that he wasn't doing it for the defense of his personal faith, but rather to show his faith.

Take the story of Peter cutting off the ear of the servant to the high priest for instance (found in Matthew 26). There was no pat on the back for Peter, but rather Jesus rebuked him for it and healed the man's ear. As he stated, he could have called down the hosts of heaven to debunk everything that was being done against him, but instead, he knew that it was not his place or time to do so.

So, these folks who claim they are striving to be "christ like" should probably be more concerned with learning the ways of their supposed leader rather than being concerned with proving other ppl's beliefs wrong.

*the road to hell is paved with good intentions, never the less, it is still the road to hell*

To each his own seems to be a hard concept for today's christians. The only reason why I addressed this thread in the first place is because the premise of it is everything against what jesus (the one the OP claims is gonna save his arse) taught his followers to strive for in their personal lives.

For the record, I believe the words of jesus show us a Light, however, I do not believe that we are going to be rescued from any outside source. The light is within us and that was all Jesus was trying to show. The magical "save me save me" Jesus is the figment of the imaginations of those who are insecure in what they have already been given by their Creator........ That is my 2 cents on modern day christianity. Most in the christian cult (defined as great devotion to a person, idea, object, movement, or work) give Christ (the man.. bc that is all he was, albeit a good one) a bad name.



reply posted on 9-8-2008 @ 12:54 PM by sotp
reply to post by Conspiriology



The figures you provide don't quite give us the whole truth there, do they? Just because religion wasn't the primary cause of all wars doesn't mean that those wars not fought on religious grounds were fought by athiests!
In fact I don't recall ever hearing of ANY atheistic societies. I know that a lot of places were tolerant of other faiths, but in most places you were either of the required local religion, or else you were exiled/put to death for being a heretic! So I implore you, please, show me at least one society in history that was ruled and populated by atheists.


reply posted on 9-8-2008 @ 01:12 PM by gnosis111
reply to post by Bigwhammy



I choose to blindly believe Zeitgeist as you choose to blindly believe the bible.
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Truth About the Garden of Eden Story
  Posted 6 days ago with 49 member flags
We Have Been Lied To
  Posted 18 days ago with 37 member flags
The Mormon Church is a Cult
  Posted 9 days ago with 23 member flags
Exposing the tragic fabrication of a saviour of the world
  Posted 19 days ago with 19 member flags
Who killed the prophet Muhammad? A 1400 year old murder mystery.
  Posted 14 days ago with 16 member flags
Quake Reveals Day of Jesus\' Crucifixion
  Posted 2 days ago with 10 member flags
Is The Bible Real?
  Posted 17 days ago with 9 member flags
The talk too controversial for TED to post...
  Posted 10 days ago with 9 member flags