It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
My personal opinion, and probably one that wont be very popular is that IF Obama does attempt to ban firearms is that you will see the white supremacist movement (or maybe even an average Joe) take action to end his presidency. There's no way that the extreme groups in america would allow such a thing to happen.
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
reply to post by XTexan
My personal opinion, and probably one that wont be very popular is that IF Obama does attempt to ban firearms is that you will see the white supremacist movement (or maybe even an average Joe) take action to end his presidency. There's no way that the extreme groups in america would allow such a thing to happen.
you're prbably right
except that, once again stated, Obama doesnt want to take your guns away
Obama wants to leave gun control up to each individual state.
AKA
Its not a decision he plans on trying to enforce his opinion on.
Leave it up to the states.
Did anyone even read that
Originally posted by Illahee
Folks please avoid being baited by Andrew E. Wiggin. He has been sponsoring Pro Obama threads and derailing any that are not his own views as in this one.
Here is an example from his own thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
A couple of Andrews responses from page one of his sponsored topic:
"Please - by all means - go reread the article and actually post something about the topic, and not the poster.. its kind of frowned upon around here."
"is that what you meant to post and just messed up? ...or did you actually intend to post off topic? "
"Are you done posting off topic?
I would go rewrite the OP in crayon, but ATS doesnt have that font. "
And from page 2:
"If both are the same (which is the argument i make)
then which would you do?
You can choose "neither" and explain why
but you chose to discuss something all together difference.
Talk about the thread, or go bother someone else."
From this we are just short of moderator intervention and warnings. And this follows through on several political threads and posts.
Please avoid being baited off topic by this poster. Investigate the actions and decide for yourself.
Back to this topic.
Lets hear your opinions (no facts, they are already verified in the link above)
2000: cosponsored bill to limit purchases to 1 gun per month. (Oct 2007)
Bush erred in failing to renew assault weapons ban. (Oct 2004)
As a general principle, I believe that the Constitution confers an individual right to bear arms. But just because you have an individual right does not mean that the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of that right, in the same way that we have a right to private property but local governments can establish zoning ordinances that determine how you can use it.